Movie opinions thread (what have you seen, what did you think?)

terry.330

Classic. Haven't Played It Yet.
20 Year Member
Joined
May 4, 2004
Posts
12,747
Death Proof might be my favorite Tarantino piece. I also didn't love it right off the bat but it's really grown on me over the years. Kurt Russell's performance is fantastic and it's a great example of efficient action and story telling.

I always feel bad for Mary Elizabeth Winstead though. They just leave her there in that cheerleader outfit with that creepy redneck and then she's never shown again.
 

Average Joe

Calmer than you are.
20 Year Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2002
Posts
16,298
I Saw The TV Glow

Wow, I hated this so much and I tried so hard not to.

It looks so damn cool a lot of the time with plenty of unique visuals that accompany a soundtrack, while not my thing personally, is admittedly very suiting and chill. I honestly have to give it a lot of credit for being very visually distinct and really being proud of what it is going for as a lot of people seem to dig it.

It's just a very meandering film that never really goes anywhere and doesn't have enough of the "fun" visuals the trailers would lead you to believe so you're just left with a surprisingly straightforward message about the importance of accepting yourself for who you are. It also doesn't help by having an absolutely insufferable lead that spends the entire movie being a milquetoast little shit that never stops being annoying the second he first appears on screen. It would have made for a far better 30-40 minute short than a full-length film, but I still probably would have disliked it regardless.

I should have seen this coming since I also hated We're All Going to the World's Fair, but I totally got suckered in by the trailers.
 
Last edited:

LoneSage

A Broken Man
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Posts
46,395
I always feel bad for Mary Elizabeth Winstead though. They just leave her there in that cheerleader outfit with that creepy redneck and then she's never shown again.
That guy was the same character who paid Buck to rape Beatrix while she was comatose, only for her to wake up and rip out his lower lip. So yeah, poor Mary definitely got raped.
 

heihachi

Amusaka's Lacky
Joined
Jul 11, 2016
Posts
967
That guy was the same character who paid Buck to rape Beatrix while she was comatose, only for her to wake up and rip out his lower lip. So yeah, poor Mary definitely got raped.
The other girls probably would've killed him like Kurt Russell when they got back if that makes you feel any better for Mary
 

wyo

Ned's Ninja Academy Dropout
10 Year Member
Joined
May 22, 2013
Posts
11,521
That guy was the same character who paid Buck to rape Beatrix while she was comatose, only for her to wake up and rip out his lower lip. So yeah, poor Mary definitely got raped.
That's the post credit scene in the uncut version.
 

Hot Chocolate

No Longer Yung, No Longer Raoul,
20 Year Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2002
Posts
10,686
Ghost In The Shell: Innocence
-new 4K transfer and yeah it definatly looks clean during the non cg bits buuuuuuuuuuuut the cg bits are showing their age. This is still either you like it or you don't understand why they made a sequel, I am ok with a Batou & Togusa buddy cop psychological adventure with special guest Makoto.

Bullets Over Summer
-still one of my fav '90s HK buddy cop movies that I discovered in the early aughts, that man is a loose cop rocking Sony headphones and a Hawaiian shirt but damn it he gets results after he finishes eating his ice cream cone.
 

terry.330

Classic. Haven't Played It Yet.
20 Year Member
Joined
May 4, 2004
Posts
12,747
Poor Things- The Bride Of Frankenstein meets Willy Wonka from the director of The Lobster? Sure, why not. This was excellent, maybe fantastic is a better word for it. The cast was perfect, the performances are top notch and daring and the production design is absolutely incredible. Bella's character development was handled exceptionally well and never feels forced or phony. Her self discovery and awareness of the world are simultaneously hilarious and profound. The movie really manages a tight balancing act.

My only real complaint is that it's long and it feels long, not in a bad way necessarily but it's just a lot. Also the more articulate Bella becomes the more Emma Stone fades in and out of her english accent. Minor gripes everything considered though. Highly recommended but beware there is a lot of weird sex and nudity. I can also see a lot of people being turned off by it's level of Edwardian surrealism that can be intentionally jarring and bizarre at times.
 

terry.330

Classic. Haven't Played It Yet.
20 Year Member
Joined
May 4, 2004
Posts
12,747
Godzilla 1984 (The Return Of Godzilla)- I watched the original Japanese version, apparently they cut more than 20 minutes from the US release and shot some extra scenes which completely changes the tone and pacing.

This is a direct sequel to the original 1954 Godzilla but also sort of a remake. It's also a return to the more serious tone of the original which I appreciate but man is the first half a slog. The second half really delivers and there is a lot of suit-mation action and destruction. Unfortunately without another kaiju to fight it just feels kind of lacking. The Super-X sucks. Plus there's like a 15 minute scene dedicated to rescuing the main characters from a building with a helicopter that completely kills the pacing. The climax with the volcano is also underwhelming and poorly shot. Still very enjoyable though and a nice change from how incredibly goofy and cheap the Showa era stuff had become.
 

neo_mao

moest promoenent moember of chat
15 Year Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2007
Posts
10,640
Inside Out 2 - it’s a movie about a 13 year old girl coming to terms with her emotions…of which there are many. I found it instantly relatable and I cried at the end.

I give it 2 moe’s up

Spoiler:

:timid: :timid:
 

lithy

LoneSage: lithy is just some degenerate scumbag
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2002
Posts
22,868
Inside Out 2 - it’s a movie about a 13 year old girl coming to terms with her emotions…of which there are many. I found it instantly relatable and I cried at the end.

I give it 2 moe’s up

Spoiler:

:timid: :timid:

C'mon, spoiler tags please!
 

terry.330

Classic. Haven't Played It Yet.
20 Year Member
Joined
May 4, 2004
Posts
12,747
Southern Comfort- This is a military/drama/horror hybrid from Walter Hill (The Warriors and Streets Of Fire) starring Powers Boothe, Keith Carradine and Fred Ward. A squad from the Louisiana National Guard are on weekend maneuvers in the heart of the bayou. They steel some canoes from the local Cajun residents which sets in motion a weekend of horror and madness. They are methodically stalked by the locals and picked off one by one which also causes the men to turn on each other and some to flat out snap.

The movie is absolutely soaked in atmosphere that is so nasty and dank that the swamp is basically a character of it's own. It had to been absolutely miserable to film but man does it look good at times. When you add the brutality of the characters and story to the setting it makes for a pretty intense watch.

My big problem with it though is the writing. I know it's supposed to be Louisiana in 1973 and that they're supposed to be cocky idiots playing solider but but jesus is everyone stupid. Like to the point that at times there just doesn't seem to be any logic to what's happening.

Bad writing aside there's some great scenery, solid performances and it's pretty damn engaging with a particularly tense ending. Definitely worth checking out.
 

Theruff

Crazed MVS Addict
Joined
Apr 29, 2023
Posts
140
Inside Out 2 - it’s a movie about a 13 year old girl coming to terms with her emotions…of which there are many. I found it instantly relatable and I cried at the end.

I give it 2 moe’s up

Spoiler:

:timid: :timid:
Just saw it yesterday. The best thing Disney/Pixar has put out in the last 2 years or so
 

Taiso

Outside of Causality
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2000
Posts
16,153
Horizon: An American Saga Chapter 1-Saw a matinee of this yesterday and thoroughly enjoyed it despite it being, perhaps, too ambitious.

It's essentially about the frontier era in the late 19th century in America. Starts right before the Civil War. It follows several different groups of people whose lives will eventually cross over as they all move, through desire, circumstance and consequence, towards a singular destination whether they know where they're going or not. It doesn't just follow settlers but a tribe of Apache that are fighting to keep them from coming west.

The thing I really, REALLY liked about this movie is that there are no monoliths in it. The Apache are divided amongst themselves about how to handle things. The settlers are divided. The Union Army is divided. And there is division between the factions when they come into contact with one another. This feels like a very human story and a very American story. And progress can't be halted. Progress often comes with bloodshed. There's a great part where the Apache chief is telling his son, who wants to go to war, that the wagons have started coming and they will not stop. You will kill them. Their children will kill you. Your children will kill their children. And on and on. I don't think the chief was saying not to fight, but more that he didn't see the wisdom in trying to stop it through force of arms. He didn't say that letting it happen was right. Only that since it was inevitable, why waste all the lives?

The American lieutenant in the Union Army tries to discourage the settlers from establishing their own bounty killing system where a scalp earns you money. He says 'how do you know you got the right ones?' The leader of the bounty killers says that 'eventually, we'll get the right ones.' The impication is there that too many of the wrong ones will die in the process. It's also interesting that the Union lieutenant, Trent I believe, says that he can't help them because the Union army has no jurisdiction that far out west. When he comes upon the burned settlement, he asks the survivors if they saw the three graves next to a tree on the other side of the river. The settlers say 'well, that's on that side.' His response is 'And you thoughrt they'd leave you alone just because you're on this side?' It's a great scene.

And all of this is to say nothing of Costner's role in the film as a drifter that take odd jobs and ends up in a plot revolving around a family trying to get revenge when their father was shot by the woman that he had a child without of wedlock. The woman shoots him, steals the baby and runs off. She gives room and board to a prostitute named Marigold, who is expected to babysit the child while she and her husband tend to business affairs. When the family catches up to the mother, things take a bad turn and Costner ends up protecting the prostitute and the child and they end up traveling cross country to God knows where just to stay ahead of the family. Eventually, they (like everyone else) realize there's only one place to go: a town called 'Horizon'. Costner hasn't met any of the other principle characters yet but you know these disparate group of people from different walks and different goals will end up in the same place. That is, in my opinion, an essentially American story.

It has pacing issues. It feels plodding because sometimes it's hard to see where the seeds are being planted and how the branches of these different trees will interlace. As it's a three hour movie, its epic scale sometimes overwhelms the concurrent narratives running simultaneously. But for all that, it's a worthy film to take the time to watch if the frontier era is your cup of tea. It's somewhat romantic and wistful but it is also brutal, harsh and all too graphic at others. It labors to be honest while at the same time trying to keep the romantic idea of America as a foundling nation still struggling to understand itself present throughout. This isn't for everyone. Some will get bored. I found the scenic cinematography gripping enough to carry me through the bits that some might consider dull. It will feel all over the place for anyone not invested in its vision.

3.75 out of 5.
 

SouthtownKid

There are four lights
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Posts
28,796
Horizon: An American Saga Chapter 1-Saw a matinee of this yesterday and thoroughly enjoyed it despite it being, perhaps, too ambitious.

It's essentially about the frontier era in the late 19th century in America. Starts right before the Civil War. It follows several different groups of people whose lives will eventually cross over as they all move, through desire, circumstance and consequence, towards a singular destination whether they know where they're going or not. It doesn't just follow settlers but a tribe of Apache that are fighting to keep them from coming west.

The thing I really, REALLY liked about this movie is that there are no monoliths in it. The Apache are divided amongst themselves about how to handle things. The settlers are divided. The Union Army is divided. And there is division between the factions when they come into contact with one another. This feels like a very human story and a very American story. And progress can't be halted. Progress often comes with bloodshed. There's a great part where the Apache chief is telling his son, who wants to go to war, that the wagons have started coming and they will not stop. You will kill them. Their children will kill you. Your children will kill their children. And on and on. I don't think the chief was saying not to fight, but more that he didn't see the wisdom in trying to stop it through force of arms. He didn't say that letting it happen was right. Only that since it was inevitable, why waste all the lives?

The American lieutenant in the Union Army tries to discourage the settlers from establishing their own bounty killing system where a scalp earns you money. He says 'how do you know you got the right ones?' The leader of the bounty killers says that 'eventually, we'll get the right ones.' The impication is there that too many of the wrong ones will die in the process. It's also interesting that the Union lieutenant, Trent I believe, says that he can't help them because the Union army has no jurisdiction that far out west. When he comes upon the burned settlement, he asks the survivors if they saw the three graves next to a tree on the other side of the river. The settlers say 'well, that's on that side.' His response is 'And you thoughrt they'd leave you alone just because you're on this side?' It's a great scene.

And all of this is to say nothing of Costner's role in the film as a drifter that take odd jobs and ends up in a plot revolving around a family trying to get revenge when their father was shot by the woman that he had a child without of wedlock. The woman shoots him, steals the baby and runs off. She gives room and board to a prostitute named Marigold, who is expected to babysit the child while she and her husband tend to business affairs. When the family catches up to the mother, things take a bad turn and Costner ends up protecting the prostitute and the child and they end up traveling cross country to God knows where just to stay ahead of the family. Eventually, they (like everyone else) realize there's only one place to go: a town called 'Horizon'. Costner hasn't met any of the other principle characters yet but you know these disparate group of people from different walks and different goals will end up in the same place. That is, in my opinion, an essentially American story.

It has pacing issues. It feels plodding because sometimes it's hard to see where the seeds are being planted and how the branches of these different trees will interlace. As it's a three hour movie, its epic scale sometimes overwhelms the concurrent narratives running simultaneously. But for all that, it's a worthy film to take the time to watch if the frontier era is your cup of tea. It's somewhat romantic and wistful but it is also brutal, harsh and all too graphic at others. It labors to be honest while at the same time trying to keep the romantic idea of America as a foundling nation still struggling to understand itself present throughout. This isn't for everyone. Some will get bored. I found the scenic cinematography gripping enough to carry me through the bits that some might consider dull. It will feel all over the place for anyone not invested in its vision.

3.75 out of 5.
I just hope he gets to finish it. Without overwhelmingly positive reviews and spectacular box office, neither of which appear to be forthcoming, it seems unlikely.
 

Taiso

Outside of Causality
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2000
Posts
16,153
Apparently the second part is a go for theatrical release. But beyond that, it's supposed to be a 12 hour story in all. So four parts.

What I love about that is that Costner believes in his vision. He made something that he has complete confidence in. That is good.

What I don't really love about that is that in three hour chunks, it may not result in enough memorable moments to really resonate. Compare that with Hell on Wheels, a series I initially had NO interest in watching but when I discovered it wasn't just another story about an outlaw getting revenge but historical fiction about Thomas Durant and the Union Pacific Railroad, I watched it and really liked it a great dea. I can remember a lot about that series because it was in 44 minute installments and there were smaller arcs that carried it through to completion as the main storyline built and built. It also helped the story feel more brisk than it actually was. With Horizon, the three hour installments don't allow for the kind of cohesion necessary for average consumers to latch on to it. The films will require patience and I don't know how much patience today's audience has for an American frontier story that is intended by design as multiple, unrelated narratives coalescing only after one has watched 9 hours in three sitting.

I hope he gets to finish it in one fashion or another. I already like too many incomplete works.
 

terry.330

Classic. Haven't Played It Yet.
20 Year Member
Joined
May 4, 2004
Posts
12,747
I understand why Costner would want theatrical releases but honestly it should have just been a 10 or 12 part mini series.
 

fake

Ned's Ninja Academy Dropout
15 Year Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2008
Posts
11,667
I've only seen the trailers for I Saw the TV Glow, but it looks like it was made by kids who like to announce to the world that they're autistic (and also somehow think "the horror show we watched as kids is actually real" is a unique plot device).
 

terry.330

Classic. Haven't Played It Yet.
20 Year Member
Joined
May 4, 2004
Posts
12,747
When Evil Lurks- This is an Argentinian horror flick that got a decent amount of buzz when it came out fairly recently. More specifically it's an ultra violent supernatural possession movie that is extremely dark and brutal. While I can definitely say it was well made I didn't particularly enjoy it. Some of that is due to the cultural barrier which kept me from ever being totally engaged, it's also just so bleak and heavy that it left me feeling kind of numb to it. Don't get me wrong it's not shock value torture porn trash, it's very much a real film. Just not one I will probably ever watch again. Also the subtitles on Hulu were absolutely terrible which didn't help matters. Worth a watch, it's pretty interesting and unique but it's just so damn bleak.
 

Taiso

Outside of Causality
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2000
Posts
16,153

LoneSage

A Broken Man
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2004
Posts
46,395
I'm a big Costner fan. I'm the only guy I know who openly admits to being a fan of Costner. He's great and got a free pass for life from Dances With Wolves alone. His journey is incredible.
 

Ralfakick

J. Max's Chauffeur,
20 Year Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2001
Posts
4,389
Just finished Beverly Hills Cop 4. I was looking forward to this, I enjoyed it. Can’t believe John Ashton is still alive and was only like 32 in the first one.

 
Last edited:
Top