- Joined
- Dec 19, 2005
- Posts
- 24,084
that makes all the differenceYeah but I don't wear t shirts with them on
that makes all the differenceYeah but I don't wear t shirts with them on
The critics gave it 74% on Rotten Tomatoes, so I think there's something to the argument that it was fine for general audiences, but Ghostbusters goobs are the loudest voices online, so people who liked it are afraid to speak up at this point.
no, it doesn't.that makes all the difference
If you have a better metric than Rotten Tomatoes, let me know. Obviously don't take the ratings as gospel; it's all subjective and a matter of personal taste.It's been pretty well established that RT is a piss poor metric for determining the quality of something (as it measures the percentage of lukewarm and better reviews and not an average score.. and even then it does that arbitrarily) and that movie in particular had a concerted effort by legacy media to prop it up in the face of criticism from said goobs (some justified, some not) so many reviews were mealy-mouthed at best.
It's literally the worst rating site. Fanboys review bomb it and studios manipulate scores with comped/paid reviews. You're better off looking at IMDB and Letterboxed.If you have a better metric than Rotten Tomatoes, let me know. Obviously don't take the ratings as gospel; it's all subjective and a matter of personal taste.
If you have a better metric than Rotten Tomatoes, let me know. Obviously don't take the ratings as gospel; it's all subjective and a matter of personal taste.
Yeah, probably, and the Back to the Future game from Telltale Games is the closest we'll get to Back to the Future 4.There's no better sequel than the 2009 Ghostbusters game. I'll die on that hill.
Can't argue with you on that! I know what I'm watching when I get home.
FWIW, Metacritic has always seemed to be a more reliable aggregator than RT.![]()
Rotten Tomatoes Under Fire After PR Firm's Scheme to Pay Critics for Positive Reviews Uncovered - IGN
A new report details how a PR firm paid off critics to post positive reviews of 2018 drama Ophelia on Rotten Tomatoes, prompting scrutiny over the reviews aggregator.www.ign.com
This isn't a "reviews are subjective" thing. It's heavily manipulated by inside/outside sources and is a misleading metric to begin with (RT often assigns a thumbs up/thumbs down to non-scored reviews based on nothing more than their interpretation of what was written). I'd rather watch a movie that got 80% 5/5s and 20% 1/5s than a movie that got 100% 3/5s. RT considers the first movie an 80% and the second one 100%. In a non-retarded metric, the first movie is an 8 and the second is a 6.
RT props up mediocrity (big studios' specialty) and should be summarily ignored.
Like terry said, IMDB (while flawed and self-selected) is still a way better metric than RT.
Because he spent all of 2022 getting completely shit on from all sides and now nobody else wants to work with him:
Back when Bill was still marketable and funny people pretended his bullshit was charming, but now that he's just another sad old man it's considered abusive and creepy.
Bill is a violent nut, though. He headbutted a producer, dragged a female producer across a parking lot and threw her in a lake, beat the shit out of his wife on a regular basis, got a whole movie shut down for his sexual harrassment, attacked a nine year old Seth Green, etc.I don't think Bill is nearly as much of a dick as Chevy.
Chevy is just a stone cold asshole to everyone. You'll never see total strangers having a wild, fun, random night with him unlike Bill.
fuck guess it's up to me then. Give me a minute to gather my thoughts.Not defending Bill Murray's terrible behavior
STK gonna go full HDR and defend wife beating?fuck guess it's up to me then. Give me a minute to gather my thoughts.
Someone's got to, now that Connery is no longer with us.STK gonna go full HDR and defend wife beating?
And it's not just "better PR".