- Joined
- Dec 29, 2000
- Posts
- 15,533
Believe me, I know. My mother ended up in assisted living and it was the shits. But given her degree of dementia, it was a better place for her to be than still at home in the hands of people that were entirely unqualified to take care for her (read: me).Any facility that is state or federally run I would expect to be bad. But couldn’t you just throw in third party inspections, make the results public, etc?
There are a myriad of issues with the administration of these kinds of facilities, not the least of which is finding qualified staff. It's not that they don't care. It's more that they oftentimes don't have the mental fortitude to do the job. I don't know what the answer is there.
Another issue is that many of these places are state funded and they just don't pay well enough. Private facilities generally have better staff and equipment but that's because they're being funded by the rich, who only want to see their own loved ones cared for.
Ideally, you can understand when people get heavily medicated and/or thrown into a padded cell to cool down. But unfortunately, those measures that were once reserved for the most extreme of patients became a means by which to quickly deal with the problem.
Closing the 'insane asylums' was a bad move. I'm never in favor of shutting down facilities that provide much needed services for a functioning society to progress. I'm far more in favor of overhauling them and making them work. But somebody has to hold these people accountable. The patients are still human beings and we can't treat mental health facilities as 'jails for crazy people'. That's just shunting them so we don't have to see or hear them anymore.
But as to that 'accountability', bureaucracy and personal interests will almost always cause the efficiency of those watchdogs to fail.