- Joined
- Oct 12, 2003
- Posts
- 26,058
Comic is better. All of Clowes' comics are better.
I generally enjoy his stuff. Not so much his stop motion movies though.What is this forum's position on Wes Anderson?
I generally enjoy them, some better than others.
French Dispatch kinda sucked though.
I remember renting Tremors 2 because Fred "Remo Williams" Ward was in it again, and couldn't wait to watch it because I loved the first one so much. It just wasn't there for me. Was it the 3rd one where it was a prequel? I can't remember, but the one that takes place in the 1800s is the last Tremors movie I watched.Tremors 2: Aftershocks- I remember watching the first couple in the series a lot on weekend afternoons on TBS and USA back in the late 90s and early 00s. Seemed like they were always on. The first movies is great, perfect almost. This one is still enjoyable but definitely a big step down. It was 95 so they hadn't totally jumped the shark with horrible CGI and increasingly insane setting and Graboid variations yet. Still manages to have a lot of goofy charm and shoe string practical effects. There are 7 movies but I don't think I've seen past the one set in the old west. I believe the later ones have Jamie Kennedy in them which probably says it all.
That's the 4th one which is actually not too bad. The 3rd one is the where the Graboids can fly by farting...It just wasn't there for me. Was it the 3rd one where it was a prequel? I can't remember, but the one that takes place in the 1800s is the last Tremors movie I watched.
That's the 4th one which is actually not too bad. The 3rd one is the where the Graboids can fly by farting...
There's also a TV series that lasted 1 season.
This makes zero sense (well, it should make no sense, at least) if true, because you'd figure they'd be all onboard with a crushing blow against the evils of capitalism by the socialist working class. I guess it kind of shows their hand that they're more worried about the optics of depicting a revolt against entrenched power even if it aligns and is basically in support of their stated goals.
This makes zero sense (well, it should make no sense, at least) if true, because you'd figure they'd be all onboard with a crushing blow against the evils of capitalism by the socialist working class. I guess it kind of shows their hand that they're more worried about the optics of depicting a revolt against entrenched power even if it aligns and is basically in support of their stated goals.
And now he can resume contributing to evil and vapid consumerism? At that point, the CCP should just remove the movie entirely. Again, if this is real.Did you not see? Tyler was rehabilitated and released thanks to the care of the state! He was very sick and is now cured!
And now he can resume contributing to evil and vapid consumerism? At that point, the CCP should just remove the movie entirely. Again, if this is real.
I agree. On one hand I get it because there are 300 gazillion people on that continent, so thats 300 trillion more possible tickets to sell.e: dumb comparison actually but I'm still mad on how western corporates are so eager to appease chinese censorship. sigh
Now consumerism is actually an important part of their plan, they figured out it motivates people while simultaneously distracting them from thinking about what's really going on. You don't notice your neighbor getting disappeared as much when you have a new iPhone.I don’t think rejecting consumerism is part of the CCP plan anymore (or actual communism for that matter.)