Maybe focus on this issue rather than yelling about Trump and fascism.
Complaints about fascism are distracting people from valid complaints, which are about the police state. Got it.
Maybe focus on this issue rather than yelling about Trump and fascism.
You and Xavier both seem to have confused my observations with what happened for my idea for what should happen and I'm not sure why.
Everyone did focus on this issue and it seems like it's legal for me to enter your home and shoot you if I have a badge on.
You were very anti-Trump in 2016, what happened to Bernie?
Bernie got cucked
sounds like Joe Rogan listening Bernie Bro speak.
Outright pathetic.
having a warrant doesn't absolve an officer of wrongdoing. The warrant was for the arrest of a person who was not there, based on wrong information. At the point that we realize the warrant is void, all acts by the police stemming from that warrant are also void of legality. In this case, a competent DA (not some Cameron) would charge these 3 men under manslaughter at the minimum, going as far as 2nd degree murder. Instead, they spent 6 months laying low before presenting a lot of documents that would portray Breonna Taylor as Jamarcus Glover's partner in crime. Yet the warrant still did not say that the police were there to arrest Breonna Taylor. The idea of Taylor as a criminal was a mere afterthought to protect the careers of three white murderers.
There is also the problem of the no-knock question. The officers stated they announced themselves as the police. Kenneth Walker stated that he asked who was there, and no one responded. So you have a question of proper procedure. Daniel Cameron has been trying to argue (strangely, as the prosector) that the police did announce and this was not a no-knock situation, which would absolve the police of wrongdoing. But why would Walker shoot if he knew they were the police? Why would the 911 call have Walker telling the operator that "someone kicked in the door and shot my girlfriend"?
The procedure and legality is not settled just because a guy who Mitch McConnell is very close to says so.
I'm sure it was just your average, run of the mill 12:25 AM warranted search.
I appreciate that you see the world for what it is.
But there's a point where we should expect/demand things to work as intended, rather than going "neener neener" where it often fails.
Ignoring the criminality of the act, what legal remedies does Taylor’s family have against the state?
It’s clear others are responsible for the culmination of this incident. I don’t think all of the actors involve can state they were operating in good faith. Or perhaps they were negligient their duties?
If the warrant was dead wrong in the first place then who is responsible for that? And what if any repercussions will there be?
And my argument is that things ARE working as intended. So again, is the best thing to do to hold some random cop to account for a system that has been put in place for generations now? That's just throwing someone under the bus for political obfuscation of the actual problem. Does that actually help anyone or black people in particular?
To undo this system means to undo the grasp on power and policy that statists have held over this country for years. Undo the drug war. Undo overfunding our military to the point where surplus equipment trickles down to every bumfuck PD in America. Berating the borderline high school dropouts that fill the ranks (although they are certainly worthy of some scorn) does little to curtail policies of excessive traffic enforcement of urban populations (i.e. minorities) or criminalizing victimless crime.
This is not a Trump problem as I evidenced with Biden's realignment to 'law & order' messenging after the last round of Floyd protests.
Fox's Napolitano says grand jury erred in Taylor case: 'I would have indicted all three of them'
“The law that permits the police to return fire and to defend themselves does not permit them to shoot blindly, aimlessly where they can’t see the target and they don’t even know [who] or what they’re shooting at,” Napolitano told "The Briefing" host Dana Perino. “I would have indicted all three of them and let them assert their affirmative defenses at the time of trial.”
For Lithy:
“The public seems to think this was a no-knock warrant, the grand jury heard there were knocks and shouts of ‘police, police.’ The public needs to know what the grand jury heard,” Napolitano said.
it's a tough sell if Ken's 911 call is entered into evidence, which it should be, but since Mitch-so-white is running this case from the shadows, may not be. The call has Ken saying they're being attacked. That's not something a person who knows he is talking to the cops will do. "I'm being shot at by police, send more!"
Better be tried by 12 then carried by 6.
Not if you have a term life insurance policy that pays out at more than you will ever accumulate in wealth.