I'm staying out of this one. If that's what you took from it (that women would consent to anything) I guess it's a little less "rape-y" but nonetheless. He's a total douchenozzle regardless (and no, I don't like Hillary either).
I've watched interviews with Bill Clinton's alleged rape and sexual assault victims and what they've said about Hillary attempting to coerce them and silence them is quite damning. No one talks about it. .
Actions speak louder than words. They love to hate on what Trump has said, but from what I've heard he's the lesser of two evils. .
I do, with both men and women. The folks who are flaming Trump for his locker room talk are a pack of faggots.
i work with some guys that turn into hound dogs when the women leave. these are the same guys that have to point out every woman with an attractive feature.
it's interesting how open some of these doods get.
I'm kinda surprised that any of you are actually defending what he said. Bragging about trying to fuck married women is pretty fucked up.
My candidate? What are you talking about. I'm not voting for him and i'm not condoning any of his behaviors. The topic is locker room talk. Focus.
It is hypocrisy on both sides - always. The idea that liberals, conservatives, and independents don't talk like this, or haven't talked like this at some point is the "ell oh ell" moment.
This.
I'm kinda surprised that any of you are actually defending what he said. Bragging about trying to fuck married women is pretty fucked up. But hell, we'll just let that one slide. Bragging about grabbing women's pussies without their consent is sexual assault.
Of course everyone has been a part of "locker room talk", but I think this goes beyond that.
I'm not surprised. Dnsdies is a colossal faggot and all around social failure. I'm sure his desire to blindly defend trump, especially on this topic ("omg guys he was just exaggerating wtf is wrong with yall?!") is probably motivated by his own struggles with women or that he says a lot worse things in the locker room at the YMCA, when he's not asking little boys if they like movies about gladiators.
"Regardless of how shocking and horrific Donald Trump's words about 'grab them by the p-----, you can do anything' are ... the activity itself does not necessarily constitute the criminal or civil offense of sexual assault," he wrote in a press release.
Banzhaf explained that Trump's qualifier before the statement — "and when you're a star, they let you do it. You can do anything" — implies there was consent.
"If she encouraged and cooperated in his sexual advances because he was a 'star' whom she wanted for whatever reason to please — as he implied by the words 'they let you do it' — then, as unseemly as the scenario might be, it would probably not constitute sexual assault,"
You guys don't seem to know what implied consent is, or what the legal stance on this issue would be, so here's an actual lawyer, George Washington University public interest law professor John Banzhaf:
http://www.businessinsider.com/law-...ms-on-audio-may-not-be-sexual-assault-2016-10
I'm not surprised you're totally unwilling to see this angle. You hate Trump, you let your emotions overcome logic, and you say stupid things. It's only human.
Everybody forgets the importance of qualifying statements when they have a narrative to spin.
Thanks for Correcting the Recordゥ!
lol
Leave your house, go to a bar, hit it off with a woman, take her home, grab her crotch, and see how far the "implied consent" argument gets you when she calls the cops.
"Trust, but verify", not "Listen and believe"Well there are 7 women who say he didn't have consent.
Didn't read the article at all, did we?
So, you either are incapable of reading the mood and understanding social cues, and honestly ask permission like an autist before engaging in any intimate behavior with a woman, or you're scrambling to keep this retarded narrative that Trump goes around just grabbing pussies at random for 30 years and never has anyone say anything until he happened to go up against the Clintons.
I really hope that you're not that dense.
"Trust, but verify", not "Listen and believe"
Many of these accounts are full of holes, like the one that claimed he touched her on a plane in First Class, when at the time, Trump owned two 727s and would not have needed to fly commercial, and first class cabins didn't have chairs with movable armrests.
I find their claims dubious at best, and I'd like to see some evidence, such as the flight manifest from the day in question showing that Trump was even there. That should be easy enough to find.
#dnsdied4shithuman2016
I hope someone grabs your vagina, little bitch.
I hope someone make a sexual assault claim against you and you're denied due process like you wish upon others.
You have no moral, ethical, or legal high ground here.
"Trust, but verify", not "Listen and believe"
Many of these accounts are full of holes, like the one that claimed he touched her on a plane in First Class, when at the time, Trump owned two 727s and would not have needed to fly commercial, and first class cabins didn't have chairs with movable armrests.
I find their claims dubious at best, and I'd like to see some evidence, such as the flight manifest from the day in question showing that Trump was even there. That should be easy enough to find.
Only as an available statistic showing the levels at which they might happen.I'm sorry, but you have been hyping sexual assault claims outside the judicial system for some time.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...-trump-sex-assault-claims-20161014-story.htmlYes, I know this is all part of a global conspiracy. It's all documented in a pamphlet titled "Protocol of the Elders of CLinton".
I can find a lot more than that that say that the dinosaurs either didn't exist or co-existed with man. I can only assume that you believe them implicitly too.Well there are 7 women who say he didn't have consent.