### Post your PIC - Official Thread ###

kernow said:

holy shit falk you look about 45? what gives?

Click to expand...

45? most people think i'm between 30 and 35. i just turned 26, actually.

well ... dunno. i'm my parents only child and my 12 years older cousin always used to be like a sister for me. huge influence right from the start and most people thought she was my gf, when she came with us on vacation in 2001. (after her boyfriend lost it and went crazy, btw.)

i think another major influence was a 23 years older woman that i had a crush on, when i was 16. yes, she still is an amazing lady and to this day quite important to me. she's the cousin of my parents' best friends and got something like an aunt for me. that being said ... my fav aunt (my 12 years older cousin's mom) died at the age of about 50, when i was 13 and my granny, who sort of raised me died a month after my 8th birthday.
thing is ... the lady i mentioned helped me with moving to kassel, finding a flat and getting started at uni. it's a long story and i really don't want to go too much into detail, but i have the feeling that something's not right. you know ... she's been there for me and all and i can't deal with the thought that such a wonderful human being might not be happy herself. problem is that she didn't really talk to me in almost 3 years, but still doesn't seem to want to let go entirely.

dunno ... rough times and a feeling of responsibility, regrets and guilt, maybe ...
living in kassel isn't exactly easy/fun and during these four years that i spent here, i almost died twice. the first time in car accident and the second time because of an overdose of painkillers. (hear that, Mike? be carefull!) the painkiller thing was because of an infected ear that didn't get better, which is why the whole nerve got infected ... right down to my wisdom teeth. bad thing was that my mom heard it through the phone, that i could barely breath anymore. could hardly convince her that everything was ok and passed out a few minutes later.

meh ... there were many more fucked up things and thoughts that i had to deal with on my own. can't think of another reason ...

edit :

oh ... and i didn't even wear my glasses, when i took those pics.

IndeX said:

you have nice breasts.

Click to expand...

Nice fake account there...

supergoose79 said:

45? most people think i'm between 30 and 35. i just turned 26, actually.

Click to expand...

I would've said about 30, but uh not including any negative connotation whatsoever!

proof that beautiful people can be into video games as well.

melchia said:

Nice fake account there...

Click to expand...

Please tell me you came here for the games, but stayed for the drama...

BryLmoo said:

proof that beautiful people can be into video games as well.

Click to expand...

Hey, thanks man. You're pretty cool there yourself.

gamejunkie said:

Please tell me you came here for the games, but stayed for the drama...

Click to expand...

Yeah, thats how i roll

melchia said:

Well, consider this...what if I didn't seek this site out? What if someone whose opinion I value very highly and who knew I enjoy video games introduced me to this site because he thought I might enjoy the conversation found herein?

Now realize that that is exactly how I was introduced to this place. I was not looking for acceptance. It's much simpler than that. To be honest, I enjoy intelligent argument and wit, so this place is pretty apealing to me (with a few exceptions here and there).

Click to expand...

Well, the 1% qualifier is there for a reason; someone could be involved in a niche interest because they're exceptionally individualistic or intellectually curious. And of course, some behaviors are so simple that this social theory need not apply, because we do them to have fun. Clearly, if someone rock climbs they're not marginalizing themselves because of a deficiency, even though rock climbing is a niche interest. So this mainly applies on a scale of someone's general social affiliations or the peer group they identify with- activities which have little relevance to these will have little bearing on how deficient someone is.

Turrican_Man said:

Well, the 1% qualifier is there for a reason; someone could be involved in a niche interest because they're exceptionally individualistic or intellectually curious. And of course, some behaviors are so simple that this social theory need not apply, because we do them to have fun. Clearly, if someone rock climbs they're not marginalizing themselves because of a deficiency, even though rock climbing is a niche interest. So this mainly applies on a scale of someone's general social affiliations or the peer group they identify with- activities which have little relevance to these will have little bearing on how deficient someone is.

Click to expand...

Hey there, smart guy.

Turrican_Man said:

Well, the 1% qualifier is there for a reason; someone could be involved in a niche interest because they're exceptionally individualistic or intellectually curious. And of course, some behaviors are so simple that this social theory need not apply, because we do them to have fun. Clearly, if someone rock climbs they're not marginalizing themselves because of a deficiency, even though rock climbing is a niche interest. So this mainly applies on a scale of someone's general social affiliations or the peer group they identify with- activities which have little relevance to these will have little bearing on how deficient someone is.

Click to expand...

babelfish doesnt seem to help....

Abasuto said:

Click to expand...

ps: i still love you melchia.

Turrican_Man said:

Well, the 1% qualifier is there for a reason; someone could be involved in a niche interest because they're exceptionally individualistic or intellectually curious. And of course, some behaviors are so simple that this social theory need not apply, because we do them to have fun. Clearly, if someone rock climbs they're not marginalizing themselves because of a deficiency, even though rock climbing is a niche interest. So this mainly applies on a scale of someone's general social affiliations or the peer group they identify with- activities which have little relevance to these will have little bearing on how deficient someone is.

Click to expand...

I think you and my philosophy professor drink tea together.

Melchia you are getting alot of attention. Are you enjoying this?

gamejunkie said:

I think you and my philosophy professor drink tea together.

Click to expand...

I don't think they drink the tea. I think they talk about the tea. Then they throw it in eachother's faces.

SPINMASTER X said:

Melchia you are getting alot of attention. Are you enjoying this?

Click to expand...

You're just jealous. Jealous that your cowboy hat now plays second fiddle.

This thread is overwhelming

i love how pretty much everyone who's posted my pic and made some stupid comment isn't man enough to post their own picture.
fucking pussies.

skot said:

i love how pretty much everyone who's posted my pic and made some stupid comment isn't man enough to post their own picture.
fucking pussies.

Click to expand...

And you know why that is

Stinky-Dinkins said:

You're just jealous. Jealous that your cowboy hat now plays second fiddle.

Click to expand...

Did you say you saw a cowboy hat playing a fiddle? That's some x-files shit right there...

skot said:

i love how pretty much everyone who's posted my pic and made some stupid comment isn't man enough to post their own picture.
fucking pussies.

Click to expand...

Alright there, tough guy.

people seen my pic and shit

hey you! pikachu!

Turrican_Man said:

Well, the 1% qualifier is there for a reason; someone could be involved in a niche interest because they're exceptionally individualistic or intellectually curious. And of course, some behaviors are so simple that this social theory need not apply, because we do them to have fun. Clearly, if someone rock climbs they're not marginalizing themselves because of a deficiency, even though rock climbing is a niche interest. So this mainly applies on a scale of someone's general social affiliations or the peer group they identify with- activities which have little relevance to these will have little bearing on how deficient someone is.

Click to expand...

You did not have enough information about me to determine social/peer group affiliations, when you first posted. I would therefore have to argue that your intial post was incredibly assumptive.

You stated:

Turrican_Man said:

there is over a 99% chance you are emotionally or socially dysfunctional. But I guess it's still not a certainty. I'm interested to see if you'll honestly admit being dysfunctional or not, or whether this would corroborate my social theory.

Click to expand...

The very tone and numbers (your numbers are more than questionable) make it seem all but impossible for me to be anything but 'dysfuntional.' After all, you alot only a 1% chance for 'uncertainty,' and your interest in whether or not I would "honestly admit" takes the presumptive stance that for me to admit anything other than social or emotional 'dysfunction' is less than honest.

Why don't you post a picture, so that no matter how attractive/unattractive you are, I can find some reason to attack you personally (even though I don't know anything about you, other than that you post here and have a working knowledge of the mechanics of written composition)?

SPINMASTER X said:

Melchia you are getting alot of attention. Are you enjoying this?

Click to expand...

It depends on which aspect you are referring to...for all his employment of the English language in composition, I get annoyed with Turrican_Man's assumptions.

melchia said:

You did not have enough information about me to determine social/peer group affiliations, when you first posted. I would therefore have to argue that your intial post was incredibly assumptive.

You stated:

The very tone and numbers (your numbers are more than questionable) make it seem all but impossible for me to be anything but 'dysfuntional.' After all, you alot only a 1% chance for 'uncertainty,' and your interest in whether or not I would "honestly admit" takes the presumptive stance that for me to admit anything other than social or emotional 'dysfunction' is less than honest.

Why don't you post a picture, so that no matter how attractive/unattractive you are, I can find some reason to attack you personally (even though I don't know anything about you, other than that you post here and have a working knowledge of the mechanics of written composition)?

Click to expand...

Social scientists say we're all dysfunctional.

Besides, Turrican_man is obsessed with a man who is obsessed with not having girls like him.

Scientists also say we're all at least a little gay.

Magnaflux said:

Scientists also say we're all at least a little gay.

Click to expand...

I'll agree with this. If you do nothing but deny gayness, then you probably are gay.

melchia said:

It depends on which aspect you are referring to...for all his employment of the English language in composition, I get annoyed with Turrican_Man's assumptions.

Click to expand...

He's speaking of Stinky's comment. He too wants the beaver bumpin'.