Pulstar is better than Blazing Star

Neo Bomber Man

Miracle Seller, , ,
Joined
Aug 19, 2000
Posts
2,836
Apart from all its other merits Pulstar has atmosphere, something Blazing Star lacks sorely.
 

Fran

today forever
20 Year Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2000
Posts
16,468
they're both good

pulstar is more old skool,maybe because it's basically neo r-type

blazing is more modern and can be played for score

i think thats pretty important for a shooter

the only one thing that we gotta understand is how SHIT pi2 is...

last resort is great

and strikers plus is pretty,totally different game from strikers 1945 pt2

yeah,the enemies,levels and so on are almost identical

but the game must be played in a complete different way

its also quite difficult,which is always good

2-2 with the flying pancake for me,by the way
 

Liquid Snake

I am untouchable
20 Year Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2000
Posts
11,183
Never play Blazing Star in my life :(

IMO Pulstar is harder than R-type
 

Tron

Test
15 Year Member
Joined
May 20, 2004
Posts
8,146
Takumaji said:
spacebaby.jpg


...and I heard the spacebaby also bites the asses of those with too large sigs.
Every time i see that picture i think of SpaceOddessy 2010. I would agree that PS and BS are different to each other in terms how hard they are. For me BS was some thing you could jump into right away if your not in a mood for a long game.While PS is there to test your skills and reflexes on remembering the right pattern on the board to get it right to past it.I like both for that reason alone. :glee:
 
Top