Need Cash? Kill an American soldier.

[Lagduf]

The information you posted about Soviet involvement in the American Peace movement the other day was fascinating.

KGB, GRU, FSB are experts at disinformation. Next level shit. They don’t even have to actively interfere just hint at interference and we get all fucked up.

 

[Marek]

you are so sad. Do research on the Wagner Group, then kill yourself. World needs less of you, Nick.

Amen

 

[SML]

There's room for the reports to be overblown and the administration's response to the reports to be negligent.

 

[Xavier]

There's room for the reports to be overblown and the administration's response to the reports to be negligent.

?

Any new info available for you to say this and bump the thread? I'd totally tend to agree with your statement, just wondering were it came from.

 

[evil wasabi]

the bipartisan senate intelligence committee came out with a report saying that the 2016 Russia election tampering was real, and republicans claimed the reason they didn't know was because manafort obfuscated his communications with the GRU operative who was physically a part of the Trump election team.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...-democratic-hack-bipartisan-senate-panel-says
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/senate-report-russian-interference-2016-us-election/

So just give it time.

Of course the USPO pushed workers to retire early, and refuses to hire replacements, so delaying the changes is not going to repair the damage DeJoy has implemented.
https://www.phillymag.com/news/2020/08/18/mail-delays-nick-casselli-postal-workers-philadelphia/

 

[Xavier]

Yeah I thought I read about the oranges investigation being released and stating for the tenth time that the FBI was justified in following up on leads regarding the Trump campaign and Russian interference.

Goffball makes it sound like even as a presidential contender he's impervious to oversight and indictment.

So then I guess the reports found other things as well then I guess.

 

[SML]

?

Any new info available for you to say this and bump the thread? I'd totally tend to agree with your statement, just wondering were it came from.

Nothing new, it just felt like a deflection/conflation that was going unaddressed. Getting into the weeds of a fight over the accuracy of the bounty story steers the discussion away from the facts of how the administration handled the reports and the contradictory explanations of said handling.

Russia gets up to fuckery and the Trump admin consistently enables it. Duh. Making each individual case a battle is like buying into a kind of Gish gallop, where you're risking your credibility on the chance that you won't be wrong 1/n times.

You're accepting, with no benefit, the same terms that people apply when they see the press fuck up a story and decide that *nothing* the mainstream media reports can be trusted.