Owning a lot of stuff doesn't automatically make one a collector or even collectard in my eyes. If you've been into video games since a long time, it's normal that you will have a lot of games and system laying around.
That's a very interesting view. Collectors in my understanding are part of the food chain. Their purpose is to preserve items, complete and in the best condition as possible, and ultimately pass them on... for a price, of course. Is, let's say $2000 too much to ask for a game? That depends. Whenever I was going to spend that kind of dough, I didn't go out eating for months, did extra jobs, omitted alc and stored that savings with a monks discipline to finally buy that game. And I thanked the guy I bought it from afterwords, that he actually never played it. Oh, and I never even bothered to buy an Xbox One, a PS3 or 4 etc. Saved more than enough that way.
Collectards are a deranged form of the above. They do play their games, casually, since 2010 on their laggy Framemeister/55'' combo, post about their buying habits all the time & preach words of gaming wisdom like: "Spinmasters? Yeah, nice game. Got to 1cc it sometime..." I had my shares of 1ccs and it took me five years to master NTM. You basically fight against a concept specifically designed to grant the provider as many quarters as possible. This is not Uncharted here or some watered-down HD remake. This consumes time, it has an end and a beginning. If you can't acknowledge these facts, you qualify as a collectard, who's mostly about fashion and the urge of being part of it. I don't mind, there's room enough for everybody in this scene. Still, it's good to know the difference.