Originally posted by akuma12:
<strong> the way i see it, the_move has two main arguments as to why SNK > capcom:
1. the techniques have more style. i. e., khushnood throws out a fireball with one hand, whereas ken throws out a fireball with two habds. ergo, if the two were ever to meet in battle, khushnood would win, becuase he has spectularity. this can be applied to everyone in SNK games: their moves look cooler, so they would win in a fight against their capcom counterpart. (i guess that why he's called the_move)
</strong><hr></blockquote>
Not quite!
It´s not about firing a fireball with one or two hands, but throwing such a weak, small fireball with two hands.
And look at the fire effects, explosion etc. They´re far better in SNK fighters.
And Marco Rodriquez would not win, coz he throws his fireball with one hand, but he has more moves, and more powerful ones.
Originally posted by akuma12:
<strong>
2. the higher tier characters of SNK could beat up anyone from the igher tier characters of capcom. if kyo and ryu were to fight, kyo would win, becuase his specials / supers are superior. ergo, snk is better than capcom.
does anyone here understand that tiers are RELATIVE?? ryu is top tier RELATIVE to dan! kyo is top tier RELATIVE to yuri (or whoever)! they exist in different universes, with different definitions of strength.</strong><hr></blockquote>
The more versatile abilities, the more versatile the fighter. This is also the Attribute of a top tier fighter.
Originally posted by akuma12:
<strong>
-is ryu allowed to parry? because if he is, and terry can't, then ryu could win.
</strong><hr></blockquote>
The parry can be compared to a Just Defense, altough the Just Defense provides more benefits.