I'd like to think it is an homage to page 1 of LoneSage's 'black in America' thread.
Except The Fish's posts won't age like milk, unlike yours.
I'd like to think it is an homage to page 1 of LoneSage's 'black in America' thread.
Except The Fish's posts won't age like milk, unlike yours.
In 10 years, wasabi can just absorb this account into Bobak so I can distance myself from any opinions I no longer want to associate with.
Plus, milk sucks anyway.
I would like to take this opportunity to remind anyone in case they forgot or didn't know. If the Chinese invaded us tomorrow and they got treated the way police treated protesters they could technically be tried of war crimes.
Pepper spray a chemical weapon, illegal internationally
Attacking or provoking unarmed non violent citizens, illegal internationally
Targeted Attacks, corralling arresting news media press illegal internationally
Targeted Attacks on medical providers, aid stations illegal internationally
Detention of civilian bystanders with no provocation or justification, illegal internationally
I know there's got to be more
Until you think about how many more and how much worse the abuses our country would get up to if they didn't have to keep up the pretense of working within those rules, and weren't forced to circumnavigate those rules secretly. If the US government could just do whatever they wanted openly whenever they wanted, you'd quickly long for the days of those conventions.The Hague and Geneva conventions are dumb. Period.
They justify war by supposing it is something that isn’t inherently immoral and illegal so long as you play by the “rules.”
No thanks.
Until you think about how many more and how much worse the abuses our country would get up to if they didn't have to keep up the pretense of working within those rules, and weren't forced to circumnavigate those rules secretly. If the US government could just do whatever they wanted openly whenever they wanted, you'd quickly long for the days of those conventions.
We already do do whatever we want when we want.
I sure would like to see your best citation for this one.
.
You're voting for trump in a swing state. Pretty obvious. No citation needed.
lol
Flat out.
More great voter outreach from poppy. Lithy posting fake news. No way Democrats would stoop to such skulduggery.
He's voting for Trump in a swing state. He should be ashamed of himself.
.
Encouraging a voter to vote a certain way (also known as campaigning) is quite a different thing than restricting ballot access to 'unapproved' candidates, no?
For years historians and social/political scientists, assumed that people were able to overlook the nasty aspects of fascist authoritarianism because "the trains run on time".
But today, the "trains aren't running on time". The Mail is horribly late and americans are dying face down on ventilators.
Yet, the presidential election is expected to be close. Time to rethink the theory about why some people are so tolerant of fascist authoritarianism.
I'm not of course, but simply through the course of repetition I'm concerned that you may have convinced even yourself.
We're not living under fascist authoritarianism. Stop exaggerating.
That's not what he said. People are quite tolerant of it and are encouraging it. Right now its a slow drip, but Trump and Barr have nothing but authoritarian fascism in their end game goals.
We're not living under fascist authoritarianism. Stop exaggerating.
Fascism is a socio-economic political theory.
Authoritarianism is a personality type.
And the president exudes both.