Maybe only home owners should be allowed to vote. This is probably a horrible idea, but it would legitimize the votes immensely.
yea that is stupid as fuck
Maybe only home owners should be allowed to vote. This is probably a horrible idea, but it would legitimize the votes immensely.
Maybe only home owners should be allowed to vote. This is probably a horrible idea, but it would legitimize the votes immensely.
So basically you agree that Kentucky should not be allowed to vote. I mean, you guys let McConnell in (who has focused so many Senate resolutions to strip minorities of the right to due process, and substantiated his Nay against DC statehood as a refusal to give 650000 blacks more voting power), and that rabid fucking racist moron is proof that Kentucky was either robbed of a legit vote, or that the voters are fucking, fucking, fucking (like incest level fucking) stupid. And if your knee jerk reaction is to disagree, go to work and look around and tell me you're not surrounded by people stupider than you.
And if you still disagree, read your posts again. Your post history is a testimony to how stupid your coworkers have been.
I get triggered over Ky and WV in particular because the job problems people face seem unnecessary and self-caused. Both states have more industry than gets advertised. As a nation, we are told that they are suffering because of the decrease demand in coal. If I lived in KY I would make it a mission to unseat McConnell.
Bowling Green Maybe?
Ha.Prayers to the victims of that horrible tragedy.
Prayers to the victims of that horrible tragedy.
When I saw them talking about that on TV, I was like.. When the fuck did that happen? Where the hell was I?
Also, It's a nice enough city. College town, so there is that. Also not very good parking. There is very little top soil and you run into rock pretty fast when digging. It cost way more to run underground utilities there, parking lots are smaller because of added cost in building them and that sort of thing. Huge cave system under there too.
A friend of mine down there has a sink hole in his yard that keeps threatening to eat his garage. Lots of problems with sinkholes.
When I saw them talking about that on TV, I was like.. When the fuck did that happen? Where the hell was I?
Also, It's a nice enough city. College town, so there is that. Also not very good parking. There is very little top soil and you run into rock pretty fast when digging. It cost way more to run underground utilities there, parking lots are smaller because of added cost in building them and that sort of thing. Huge cave system under there too.
A friend of mine down there has a sink hole in his yard that keeps threatening to eat his garage. Lots of problems with sinkholes.
lol at your reading comprehension. The entire point was that the system doesn't favor one political party. It had nothing to do with any equivalency, false or otherwise.Lol at anyone who uses "the Democrats" of 50 years ago in a false equivalency with the ones of today
Your point is garbage and you know it
Strom thurmond was a Democrat you ass
You mean like atheists do?If there's a separation of church and state, then people that make voting decisions based on religious beliefs should have their votes nullified.
Lol at anyone who uses "the Democrats" of 50 years ago in a false equivalency with the ones of today
If there's a separation of church and state, then people that make voting decisions based on religious beliefs should have their votes nullified.
I always wondered if politics back then was as devisive as it is today.
The separation of church and state applies to the federal government only, not to any other entities or individuals.
The separation of church and state applies to the federal government only, not to any other entities or individuals.
How exactly am I wrong? It specifically mentions Congress, so you are complaining that I referred to the government as a whole rather than just Congress?
You mean like atheists do?
I don't know. What policies are atheist agendas pushing?
It applies to the states and the federal government.
No more "alternative facts" from you about constitutional law.
I didn't think it was required to mention that states cannot pass laws that violate the Constitution.