Stu looks like
Get your commemorative Stuart Campbell e-rape sigs today!
Hurry, they're going fast.
And for anyone hoping that the drama in this thread will lead to the end of Stuart's career and his suicide...
http://worldofstuart.blog.com/
...it won't. He's already had his own Urban Dictionary definition since 2004!
He's already had his own Urban Dictionary definition since 2004!
And for anyone hoping that the drama in this thread will lead to the end of Stuart's career and his suicide...
http://worldofstuart.blog.com/
...it won't. He's already had his own Urban Dictionary definition since 2004!
And for anyone hoping that the drama in this thread will lead to the end of Stuart's career and his suicide...
http://worldofstuart.blog.com/
...it won't. He's already had his own Urban Dictionary definition since 2004!
Friends (0)
This profile has no friends.
I seriously think it's time to lock this thread and move it to "Best of."
Agreed.I seriously think it's time to lock this thread and move it to "Best of."
You're not helping the cause of the intelligent in this thread.
The definitive series in Retro Gamer:
Frogger (issue 38):
Frogger II: Threeedeep!, in the magazine it is spelled 'Frogger 2:Threedeep' throughout the article. So he didn't even look at the game (box)?
And he called Frogger (first Frogger)(Parker Bros version) a 'crude-looking' effort! What??? It's an excellent title in both graphics and sound (for the time). And a million seller too. (No comparison with Supercharger, of course, but for a cart version, Frogger was top).
Galaxian (issue 32):
No mention of Galaga on Atari 7800, nor the excellent VCS version of Galaxian, nor Gorf on Jaguar (which includes the 'Galaxians' level). Although he does mention that there is no 'official' Gorf version.
Xevious (issue 34):
No mention on (again) Atari 7800 (does he actually know this console?), A8, Apple ][, nor the VCS proto (should have been included/at least mentioned as the game was started by Tod Frye).
And that is just 3 'definitive' articles picked out at random.
I really hope the writer doesn't do the 'Definitive' series much longer, as it is not.
I seriously think it's time to lock this thread and move it to "Best of."
Indeed. But that wasn't negative criticism. That was plain abuse, empirically factually wrong from start to finish and extremely personally insulting. Anyone who posts reasonable and fair criticism will get a reasonable and fair response. Anyone who says I'm a lazy incompetent shitting out badly-researched crap in a hurry for a deadline will get told to go and fuck themselves with a broken bottle. It's a pretty simple flowchart.
You wouldn't use it in front of the Queen, say.