They will go plenty loud given the proper amplification.joe8 said:Can the electrostatics go as loud as dynamics (or as loud as electrostatic headphones)?
Are there any downsides that electrostatic speakers have, compared to electrostatic headphones? (apart from the cost and privacy aspects)
It depends on the overall design. Some people like a lot of bass and slam. For those listeners, they should consider either a hybrid electrostatic speakers or adding a subwoofer(s). If adding a sub, it had better be a good one. REL and Rythmik are two that come to mind. A fast sub is required to keep up with the panel. Electrostatics can be ruthlessly revealing of the downstream components. Be sure to mate them with good gear and even better amp(s).
Which are the best electrostatic speakers- Quad ESL 63, 988/989?
This is highly subjective and come down to personal taste. I might like what you hate. Or one might work better in your system than mine. I really like the speakers by Sander Sound, they sound fantastic. Quad and Magnepan are great in my book. I'm not a fan of ML, I have some issues with their design and I don't feel that the company is what it once was. If you're interested in a hybrid similar to a ML, look at the speakers by Eminent Technology. They are a planar magnetic, but the difference between different panel types can get very technical very quickly; it's splitting hairs and well beyond the scope of your question.
I'm going with Stax. I think most would agree.Which are the best electrostatic headphones?
You need to listen and make the call; there are a zillion dynamic speakers out there. It's a different sound and presentation from an electrostatic; one isn't necessarily better than the other. For me Vandersteen speakers have been the best for not “sounding” like a box speaker. They offer clarity that’s right up there with electrostatics.Which are the best dynamic speakers- B & W 801?
Last edited: