- Joined
- Oct 11, 2004
- Posts
- 14,429
Totally agree - it also had a strange, tangible style about it that I appreciated. The tone/pacing and camera work were all just really....odd.
It felt, somehow, like less than the sum of its parts. It's hard to explain, but yeah, it just wasn't all there. I can't decide if I like Jeffrey Wright's tiny little role or not.
Saw Annihilation - Not as good as Ex Machina, but probably in the same ballpark. Several scenes was particularly good, the one with the bear and the entire last half hour or so, very good stuff.
Interesting production history for it; Paramount looked at Garland's cut and didn't like it. Said it was too intellectual, pretentious, that it wouldn't connect with people. Scott Rudin had final cut privilege, though, and said fuck the studio, we're releasing it the way Garland wants it. So Paramount cut its risk by doing a deal with Netflix to release it internationally, while Paramount kept the rights in the U.S. and a few other countries.
It ended up doing mediocre to bad at the box office, got a "C" cinemascore, and its user ratings on RT are far lower than the critical reviews. So Paramount was probably right, broadly speaking.