- Joined
- Nov 5, 2002
- Posts
- 13,560
From the trailer, I'm not impressed at all by the backrounds which in former SS games where amazing.
From the trailer, I'm not impressed at all by the backrounds which in former SS games where amazing.
While I dont think the game looks bad, I do think SNK is missing the mark. If ArcSys can still make successful, beautiful 2D fighting games, than so could SNK.
I cant look past their new Chinese ownership, and not see everything as just a cash grab. I know it's a business, but everything from SNK now just screams minimal effort, minimal investment.
Well it's not really the same company, it's just some Chinese assholes who bought the rights to milk the properties. SNK has been dead since sometime around 2001 or so.
Those where the days of 2d. What companies from back then that where relevant, still are? Nintendo, Capcom... that's about it.
It is so fucking weird that some dude who had a terrible, terrible feature in a gaming magazine got called out on it years ago and yet still posts here. I would never imagine someone like Dan Hsu or Ed Semrad, or a number of other gaming mag people, doing the same thing. It's just pathetic.
They will hold a panel at PAX East, and the original SS producer will attend the panel, along with Oda and Nobuyuki Kuroki. It's not clear if the SS1 producer is part of the game's development or if he's attending as a guest.
They are rumored to announce the new AI tech for online play as well.
previous Samurai Shodowns dont look as detailed
a drab, ugly mess with no personality.
Doesn't matter who publishes it, it matters who develops it.
Is says in the article that the publisher promised that it would not be free-to-play.
Admittedly, the most recent console I own was released 12+ years ago...
...but even I know, in 2019, microtransactions and buying stuff to supplement the main game has become the new norm.
Sorry it's not 1994 anymore gentlemen. I truly am.