Why LB vs SS wouldn't work

Joined
Aug 24, 2001
Posts
44
Besides somebody pointing out the century time difference, there are more reasons.

Yuki and Rim are the only ones who slightly have rival potential.

Last Blade had a flowing story from 1 to 2. Sam Sho had four different stories from 1 to 4.

If you take everyone who ever fought in LB(including Awakened Kaede, Hyper Kagami, Hagure, and Shikyo/Mukuro as different characters), you'd have 22.

If you slim down the cast of SS(just 1-4, no 3D or pocket characters), you'd have 25.
 

Tadaima

Host for Orochi
Joined
Dec 14, 2001
Posts
768
So, why not a "King of Samurai Last Blade" with 33 characters?... Could be funny.
 

Crazyman_bob

Galford's Armourer
Joined
Aug 3, 2001
Posts
469
I think it could work. If SNK was able to skip about 10 years with Fatal Fury and Art of Fighting, what's a century? <IMG SRC="smilies/biggrin.gif" border="0">
Plus it would be really interesting to see Kaede vs. Haohmaru, or better yet, Akari vs. Cham Cham. <IMG SRC="smilies/tongue.gif" border="0">
 

Rain

Fashion Designer,
20 Year Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2001
Posts
1,859
Originally posted by Empty Sheet Of Paper:
<STRONG>
Yuki and Rim are the only ones who slightly have rival potential.

</STRONG>

Man, what about Haohmaru and Musashi?
 
D

D-Mented

Guest
Why did you make this topic? Are they going to make a game titled Last Blade vs. Samurai Showdown? I would like to see that. <IMG SRC="smilies/ohno.gif" border="0"> <IMG SRC="smilies/ohno.gif" border="0"> <IMG SRC="smilies/ohno.gif" border="0">
 
Top