Where it's coming from is in my initial perception of the character from a 90s era video game that didn't require controversial sexuality because I don't believe it existed until the SNES controversy.
Why would they explain Poison's sexuality at all? What's the point? If they wanted a transgender character in there, they would have made it more obvious, IMO. They didn't because they didn't see the shitstorm that the SNES release would cause. And that's where the accordian ride on statements and materials began
Ono's comments, I believe, are that the character as presented in the original arcade verson of Final Fight was as a woman because they didn't think it woudl turn into this big deal that people would complain about beating up women in video games. All the convoluted mythology came afterwards, and until Capcom comes out with a definitive statement, once and for all, that she's a gender bender, I'm just not buying into it.
For the record, if they came out and just plainly stated it, I'd accept it. I really don't care what the gender/sexuality is. But until Capcom tells me, in exact terms, what she is, I'm going with what I believe she is based on my own beliefs of the original intent of the character. And I don't think my opinion is so unreasonable as to be without merit.
.02