Star Trek: Voyager

SouthtownKid

There are four lights
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Posts
28,936
I can't watch an entire series full of actors who act like they belong on Buck Rogers 1979.

42c346625ce83972833105efd4fd4174.png


On a science fiction tv show scale of 1-10, with 1 being Battlestar Galactica 1978 and 10 being Battlestar Galactica 2004, I give Voyager and Babylon 5 a 0.
 

StevenK

ng.com SFII tournament winner 2002-2023
10 Year Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Posts
11,711
I hadn't realised that the original battlestar galactica was considered a huge financial flop
 

SouthtownKid

There are four lights
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Posts
28,936
Ouch.

What about Farscape and Firefly?
Farscape is the one with the puppets, right? I haven't seen it, but I have to imagine it would be at least a little better than Babylon 5.

I like the Reconstruction era setting for Firefly. Although while it's fun to tell the story from the perspective of a relatable character on the losing side, it's kind of cheating not to have any equivalent to slavery in the mix. I think my enjoyment of the "Heroes on both sides" trope also got hurt a little when I found out recently that the writer of The Outlaw Josie Wales (original novel Eastwood's movie was based on) was in fact a secret lifelong KKK guy who hid his identity and pretended to be part native to sell his book and hide from angry people after him. So of course he is going to write a sympathetic vet on the rebel side.

Side note to the side note, but Eastwood didn't know about the novelist's true identity when he made the movie. He found out suddenly during pre-production of a sequel to Josie Wales, at which point Eastwood said fuck that and dropped out.

Back to Firefly, I fucking loved it the first time I watched it. I don't know now. I'd have to rewatch it. Luckily it's only 13 episodes, not 8 excruciating seasons of B5 or whatever. Whedon is a guy who really can't get out of his own way, and your personal enjoyment depends a lot on being able to ignore or excuse that. And some Whedonisms really haven't aged well. Even worse in the case of Dollhouse, parts of which can make you wince now in 2024.

Firefly does actually have a good cast though. Not like Voyager.
 

prof

A Great Place to Store Your Dildo Collection
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Posts
1,834
I hadn't realised that the original battlestar galactica was considered a huge financial flop
The original Battlestar Galactica movie and subsequent 1978 series were excellent for their time. STK can suck it.

Now the 1980 retooled sequel series left a lot to be desired.
 

SouthtownKid

There are four lights
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Posts
28,936
The original Battlestar Galactica movie and subsequent 1978 series were excellent for their time. STK can suck it.

Now the 1980 retooled sequel series left a lot to be desired.
Yeah, they were fine for the time. FOR THE TIME. When there wasn't anything else. I loved it when I was a little kid and starved for anything like it in the wake of the first Star Wars. It's hard to watch now that I'm not 8 years old.

And for the record, the TV show came first unless you're Canadian. The US theatrical release of the first three episodes with special rumble technology came later. Which I did watch in the theater.
 

Gentlegamer

Frenzy Football Player
10 Year Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2014
Posts
983
I can't watch an entire series full of actors who act like they belong on Buck Rogers 1979.

42c346625ce83972833105efd4fd4174.png


On a science fiction tv show scale of 1-10, with 1 being Battlestar Galactica 1978 and 10 being Battlestar Galactica 2004, I give Voyager and Babylon 5 a 0.
Erin Gray from Buck Rogers and Suzanne Somers from Three's Company was like porn on TV
 

SouthtownKid

There are four lights
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Posts
28,936
Erin Gray from Buck Rogers ... was like porn on TV
People always said that, even back in 1979, and it was always mystifying to me. Look at the picture above. She looks like Dollar Store Farrah Fawcett with a bad dye job and no chest. She was no Chrissie. She was barely Janet. The girls on Battlestar Galactica were way hotter.
 

SouthtownKid

There are four lights
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Posts
28,936
So far, Jane Seymour wins the page. She was also one of the few redeeming points of Live and Let Die. Great Bond girl in one of my least favorite Bond movies.
 

TheMagicianLord

Marked Wolf
Joined
Jun 8, 2019
Posts
210
Voyager was alright. I liked Janeway as captain more than Archer. I couldn't buy Scott Bakula as someone with 1 PhD, much less 7, in Quantum Leap, and I'm not a fan of how much his face strains in Enterprise during those moments you can tell he's trying to recall his acting training.

But all that said, as far as pure attractiveness for me in the Trek Universe, no one will top Anij:

Anij.jpg
 

Taiso

A NIGHTMARE TO OTHERS!!!
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2000
Posts
17,250
Speaking of Battlestar Galactica

 

NeoSneth

Ned's Ninja Academy Dropout
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2000
Posts
11,467
Captain/Admiral Janeway would not approve of this becoming a bikini babes thread.
she would also remind you that Ana de Armas is technically a bond girl. and let's not forget Diana Rigg.
 

Taiso

A NIGHTMARE TO OTHERS!!!
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2000
Posts
17,250
I can't watch an entire series full of actors who act like they belong on Buck Rogers 1979.

42c346625ce83972833105efd4fd4174.png


On a science fiction tv show scale of 1-10, with 1 being Battlestar Galactica 1978 and 10 being Battlestar Galactica 2004, I give Voyager and Babylon 5 a 0.
Does anyone remember when Buck Rogers took that really weird turn where they were on a space ship exploring the furthest reaches of the universe and there was tht one dude with feathers for hair?

I didn't get that at all.
 

SouthtownKid

There are four lights
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Posts
28,936
Does anyone remember when Buck Rogers took that really weird turn where they were on a space ship exploring the furthest reaches of the universe and there was tht one dude with feathers for hair?

I didn't get that at all.
That was season 2. Season 1 started with solid ratings because it, like Galactica by the same showrunner, filled a void for millions of Americans who suddenly realized they loved science fiction in the wake of 1977's Star Wars. But by the end of season 1, everyone realized, hey, this isn't so great, and ratings were on life support. So they revamped the entire show as you describe above in a desperation move, in order to get green lit for one more season.
 

Stefan

Resident Forum Reference Librarian
20 Year Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2002
Posts
1,469
Does anyone remember when Buck Rogers took that really weird turn where they were on a space ship exploring the furthest reaches of the universe and there was that one dude with feathers for hair?
Holy shit, I glanced over this article in the early morning hours today & innocuously didn't realize it was the same individual. Vague memory of syndicated cable reruns & actor likenesses years after its flash in the pan broadcast success will do that to an '80s kid. RIP.

 

Taiso

A NIGHTMARE TO OTHERS!!!
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2000
Posts
17,250
The character's name was Hawk.

I named the JPG appropriately, I think.

Strange space Roman bird man.
Hawk Tuah.jpg
 
Top