It's not survival horror at all, though, because there's a ridiculously plentiful supply of ammo, health, and armor and none of the enemies are actually a threat. They're just a nuisance that takes too long to get rid of.I think it’s a bad shooter and a mediocre survival horror
I liked the atmosphere and the storytelling.
Therefore, I suck my own butt.
No need, they fired all the retards responsible for Doom 3 and Rage and started making video games again as of 2016.Can’t wait for the remake.
Rage is pretty much how Doom 3 would be remembered if they didn't have the audacity to call it a Doom game. ie, not at all.
No need, they fired all the retards responsible for Doom 3 and Rage and started making video games again as of 2016.
Rage is pretty much how Doom 3 would be remembered if they didn't have the audacity to call it a Doom game. ie, not at all.
Rage got a sequel, but they farmed it out to Avalanche Software while id themselves were doing Doom VFR and Doom Eternal. Wise decision.I think that’s fair and/or accurate statement.
Although Rage got a sequel
I never played the first Rage but the second one was pretty boring. Some of the aspects of the gameplay were fun but on the whole, snooze fest. Terrible, pointless open world design.
No, the developers intended it as a remake of Doom. Literally, Carmack pitched it as, "I'm remaking Doom and you'll have to fire me to stop me."Doom 3 is a decent game (as a one-player game). But whether you can really call it a Doom game (in the same vein as Doom & Doom II) is another question.
The developers intended it to be a different game than the first two.
These look awesome, i wonder if i can get them onto steamdeck somehow