My thought about the hot stuff sigs...

[Amano Jacu]

Lately there has been a lot of sigs being locked because of naked girls on it... And also some with had chicks in underwear of some sort. Here it is when the border between erotism and pornography is not clear. I have seen some other sigs like that that still continue, such as BBH and Stephane's just to say some examples, I just saw them in this same forum. I don't find them to be "offensive", so for me they could stay. But I don't know if this is fair...

So I gently require everybody to be their own judges and remove by themselves (no need for Judge to do that and then put a bashing comment in your sig) any pic that can be thought "too hot". That's it.

Thanks for your attention

[ October 11, 2002: Message edited by: Amano Jacu ]</p>

 

[BBH]

Originally posted by Amano Jacu:
<strong>Lately there has been a lot of sigs being locked because of naked girls on it... And also some with had chicks in underwear of some sort. Here it is when the border between erotism and pornography is not clear. I have seen some other sigs like that that still continue, such as BBH and Stephane's just to say some examples, I just so them in this same forum. I don't find them to be "offensive", so for me they could stay. But I don't know if this is fair...

So I gently require everybody to be their own judges and remove by themselves (no need for Judge to do that and then put a bashing comment in your sig) any pic that can be thought "too hot". That's it.

Thanks for your attention</strong><hr></blockquote>

As long as there's no nudity in the pic, whether it be a real photo or drawn, there should be no problems with these pictures in sigs. The only other reason to lock down a sig is if the picture is too big, whether it's pixel size or larger than 100k. I'm not taking my sig picture of the lovely Yoko Matsugane out unless you put it to a poll and find more people that want me to remove it than to keep it (Good fucking luck on that one).

And since I've been rotating these pics for months now and haven't gotten my profile locked by Judge Dredd, I'm going to assume that I've been complying with forum regulations.

[ October 11, 2002: Message edited by: BBH ]</p>

 

[ray_7]

True!

No nudity, no problem. If there's nudity, then Mr. Dredd will take action. Btw, don't you think it's kinda refreshing to look at stuff like that sometimes rather than playing your video games all the time?

Ray

 

[Judge Dredd]

Originally posted by Amano Jacu:
<strong>Lately there has been a lot of sigs being locked because of naked girls on it... And also some with had chicks in underwear of some sort. Here it is when the border between erotism and pornography is not clear. I have seen some other sigs like that that still continue, such as BBH and Stephane's just to say some examples, I just saw them in this same forum. I don't find them to be "offensive", so for me they could stay. But I don't know if this is fair...

So I gently require everybody to be their own judges and remove by themselves (no need for Judge to do that and then put a bashing comment in your sig) any pic that can be thought "too hot". That's it.

Thanks for your attention

[ October 11, 2002: Message edited by: Amano Jacu ]</strong><hr></blockquote>

No nudity in Sigs. No pictures so large as to force people to scroll past an entire screen to get beyond them. Stacking five or six pictures on top of each other so that people are forced to scroll is also not kosher.

 

[Amano Jacu]

Originally posted by BBH:
<strong>

As long as there's no nudity in the pic, whether it be a real photo or drawn, there should be no problems with these pictures in sigs. The only other reason to lock down a sig is if the picture is too big, whether it's pixel size or larger than 100k. I'm not taking my sig picture of the lovely Yoko Matsugane out unless you put it to a poll and find more people that want me to remove it than to keep it (Good fucking luck on that one).

And since I've been rotating these pics for months now and haven't gotten my profile locked by Judge Dredd, I'm going to assume that I've been complying with forum regulations.

[ October 11, 2002: Message edited by: BBH ]</strong><hr></blockquote>

Please read again my post. I was NOT saying your sig should be removed. I was just putting it as an example just because I had just seen it in another post in this same forum.
You are right, yours are staying for quite a long time so you can assume they are OK, and nobody is complaining (DEFINATELY not me, I even LIKE that pics).
I'm just saying that people has to judge their own pics. You have judged yours and said it's OK. Then go on.
I only want to evitate Judge's action with common sense. Nobody should be stupid enough to have his sig locked for a silly thing like that.
Also that way we wouldn't see posts like "Hey, XXX has a porn sig, Judge show him who is the law!". And you have reacted like if this post said that with XXX=BBH. And (again) this is NOT the case.

Serious comments will be welcome.

[ October 11, 2002: Message edited by: Amano Jacu ]</p>

 

[Stephane]

Dont be jealous my sig ROCKS !!!!!!!

Hey do you have noticed , that s just a puppet nothing more !