Movie opinions thread (what have you seen, what did you think?)

Tarma

Old Man
25 Year Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2001
Posts
10,231
Hardware - 1990 Sci-Fi horror about a seemingly destroyed killer cyborg who rebuilds itself inside a woman's apartment with rather fatal results.

I've been wanting to watch this for years, but for some reason it has consistently alluded me. Thankfully Ozzie label Umbrella have just pumped out a superb 4K special edition which I promptly jumped on.

Hardware is very stylishly shot, has an awesome soundtrack, and cranks the tension steadily toward its bloody conclusion. I really enjoyed it, and its atmosphere kind of reminded me of the earlier Max Headroom: 20 Minutes Into The Future - both dystopian future set films, both made in the UK.

Featuring the voice of Iggy Pop and a cameo from Motorhead's Lemmy, they just don't make them like this anymore.
 

Ralfakick

J. Max's Chauffeur,
25 Year Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2001
Posts
5,161
A Working Man - If this is the movie that supplanted Snow White, then Snow White must be horrible. Cowritten by Sylvester Stallone this is Cobra level of schlock. I mean I love Cannon Films, I totally expected the Cannon logo to start the film it would fit in as a modern version of one of their movies. I could totally see Charles Bronson playing the role as the washed up action man rescuing his boss’s daughter. For a Satruday night or direct to Netflix film it would be ok, but for paying money to see it was pretty bad, the characters even the minor ones all had their own funky design like let’s make this weird looking thin blond Russian have glittery jacket and a machine gun, or make these two dopey twins wear strange designer clothes. I like action movies but this was one of Statham’s worst he needs to stick with Guy Ritchie.
 

Ralfakick

J. Max's Chauffeur,
25 Year Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2001
Posts
5,161
Hit the backlog recently while I had the house to myself:

All Is Lost (2013): A very simple film about a guy lost at sea with minimum talking. The sound is excellent and this film shines if you have a projector and sound set up.

Incendies (2010): Denis Villeneuve's take on Wajdi Mouawad's play. Good film and adaption, but It's a one and done viewing for me.

Hell or High Water (2016) / No Country for Old Men (2007): Since the house was empty, I decided to play two movies showcasing West Texas. They're both excellent and have a great soundtrack. I've seen these countless of times, but never back to back.

The Minecraft Movie (2025): Saw this with the kids recently and was pleasantly surprised. It's a Jared Hess film, so it kind of feels like a pseudo-Napoleon Dynamite spiritual sequel. Think Pixels meets Napoleon Dynamite. It references the former Idaho based film in many scenes and is shot similarly. My only gripe was that I was hoping for a Jon Heder cameo. If you liked Nacho Libre and Napoleon Dynamite, you'll enjoy this one as well. It also pokes fun at retro gamers and collectors, which was hilarious.
All is Lost is Great snd that’s exactly how I first watched it.
 

terry.330

Fuckin’ Voodoo Magic Mon
20 Year Member
Joined
May 4, 2004
Posts
13,960
Hardware - 1990 Sci-Fi horror about a seemingly destroyed killer cyborg who rebuilds itself inside a woman's apartment with rather fatal results.

I've been wanting to watch this for years, but for some reason it has consistently alluded me. Thankfully Ozzie label Umbrella have just pumped out a superb 4K special edition which I promptly jumped on.

Hardware is very stylishly shot, has an awesome soundtrack, and cranks the tension steadily toward its bloody conclusion. I really enjoyed it, and its atmosphere kind of reminded me of the earlier Max Headroom: 20 Minutes Into The Future - both dystopian future set films, both made in the UK.

Featuring the voice of Iggy Pop and a cameo from Motorhead's Lemmy, they just don't make them like this anymore.
Hardware is pretty cool, hopefully someone will put out Dust Devil properly remastered one of these days. Too bad The Island of Dr. Moreau broke Richard Stanley for decades. If you haven’t seen Lost Soul: The Doomed Journey of Richard Stanley’s Dr. Moreau it’s definitely worth watching.
 

100proof

Insert Something Clever Here
10 Year Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2014
Posts
4,386
Fight or Flight (2025) - Action/comedy romp starring Josh Hartnett about a down-on-his-luck super secret agent man who gets roped into finding a highly-desired target on a transcontinental flight only to discover that 75% of the plane is full of assassins and hitmen who are also looking for said target. Ultra-violence ensues.

I've seen a lot of people call this "Bullet Plane" as the premise is somewhat similar to Bullet Train and has that movie's rather silly tone but the similarities end there. Bullet Train has more of a 90s MTV pop-editing style and is prone to long-winded, cutesy Tarantino/Guy Ritchie monologues/dialogues about pop culture ephemera. This movie is a borderline cartoon in places. Not unlike the Crank movies or something Sam Raimi would think of when he's bored on a long flight. The characters are largely paper-thin (the hitmen and assassins are more or less video game fodder who get no characterization whatsoever), the b-plot with Josh Hartnett's handlers is a waste of time and the super-duper hacker target/eventual sidekick is a total wet blanket. That said, Josh Hartnett saved the whole thing for me. He buys in completely and gets the tone of the movie. He starts out as an exasperated, miserable drunk who'd rather be anywhere else doing anything else for anyone else but as the stakes rise and the movie gets increasingly slapstick and ultra-violent, he goes goofy alongside it and is a lot of fun.

It's not a great movie (or possibly even good) but for those who like a little bit of ultra-violence in a unique setting, it's an amusing 90 minutes.


Hell of a Summer - Finn Wolfhard and his creative partner (?) wrote, directed and appear in a little summer camp slasher movie that has a pinch of Wet Hot American Summer in it (awkward, earnest cringe humor). A socially awkward 24-year-old manchild feels at home in his long-time summer camp but arrives to the counselor initiation weekend to find himself and the other counselors being stalked by a killer.

Everything in this is kind of half-baked. Stranger Things kid clearly has an affection for the old camp slasher movies and uses a lot of the tropes well but it feels like it can't figure out what tone it wants. The premise is as stock as they come, the characters are largely cardboard cutouts from that genre, the violence/kills aren't interesting enough to sustain interest and the writing isn't strong enough to make up for the rest. The main character (played by John Hechinger) is the only one who gets enough room to breathe and he does pretty well playing the awkward, naive, virginal 20-something who hasn't figured his life out and just desperately wants to cling to his childhood. Everybody has known a guy like that or was that guy at some point and he captures it well down to the body language.

Unfortunately, it devolves in to boring Scream territory towards the end and the characters' motivations make very little sense. Good first try, Wolfhard. Better luck next time.


Intruder (1989) - Throwaway direct-to-video slasher movie made by a lot of the people in the Raimi-sphere. The night crew of a grocery store (on the verge of closing down) get trapped inside and gradually murdered in creative ways.

The movie itself is pretty forgettable for the most part. There's a couple of very creative kills from the KNB effects guys but it's otherwise a pretty bog-standard 80s slasher with a somewhat unique setting. What makes it interesting is the cast and crew. The movie is directed and written by long-time Raimi collaborator Scott Spiegel and both Sam and Ted Raimi play minor parts and get unceremoniously killed. A bunch of other Raimi regulars (Bruce Campbell in a cameo, Dan Hicks is one of the owners of the store, Greg Nicotero has a cameo) show up and the movie has a hint of the dark sense of humor that this group is known for (particularly in the conveniently placed safety signs).

Apparently the movie was a victim of the collapse of Empire Pictures in the late 80s and got unceremoniously dumped on to VHS by Paramount but it's one of the many movies from that era that are now getting its flowers from horror nerds thanks to word of mouth and shiny hi-def releases from those little boutique distributors. The movie itself is no great shakes but it makes for an interesting footnote in horror history.
 

terry.330

Fuckin’ Voodoo Magic Mon
20 Year Member
Joined
May 4, 2004
Posts
13,960
lol Trap is garbage, just a feature length music video for M. Night’s daughter.

Hartnett is awesome though, always has been. Even in shit movies like Trap. If you want to see him in actual good projects check out Penny Dreadful, O and Lucky Number Slevin.
 

SouthtownKid

There are four lights
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Posts
28,936
Trap was dumb as fuck, but I enjoyed it. It was above average for M Night. Not one of his best, but above the middle point and far from his worst.
 

fake

Warrior of the Innanet
15 Year Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2008
Posts
12,537
Any of you tuna boys seen Warfare yet? I'm skeptical. I thought Civil War was a great movie, and this seems too similar. Also, to quote the internet, "war made our American boys saaaad."
 

Lagduf

2>X
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Posts
51,784
Not unless I hear something great about it. I am curious what story they’re trying to tell. Sounds like it’s just a “based on a true story” action fodder.

Like where’s my Global War On Terror (GWOT) version of Paths of Glory, Catch-22, MASH, or Das Boot?
 

terry.330

Fuckin’ Voodoo Magic Mon
20 Year Member
Joined
May 4, 2004
Posts
13,960
The Descent 2- Holy shit, I heard this was bad but jeezus. It’s not just a terrible, terrible movie but a complete insult to the first. Trash.
 

max 330 megafartz

The Almighty Bunghole
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 14, 2004
Posts
6,435
Hardware - 1990 Sci-Fi horror about a seemingly destroyed killer cyborg who rebuilds itself inside a woman's apartment with rather fatal results.

I've been wanting to watch this for years, but for some reason it has consistently alluded me. Thankfully Ozzie label Umbrella have just pumped out a superb 4K special edition which I promptly jumped on.

Hardware is very stylishly shot, has an awesome soundtrack, and cranks the tension steadily toward its bloody conclusion. I really enjoyed it, and its atmosphere kind of reminded me of the earlier Max Headroom: 20 Minutes Into The Future - both dystopian future set films, both made in the UK.

Featuring the voice of Iggy Pop and a cameo from Motorhead's Lemmy, they just don't make them like this anymore.
GWAR is also briefly shown on the tv near the beginning. Great movie! I like to imagine that the spying neighbor is Xavier. 🤣
 

Tarma

Old Man
25 Year Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2001
Posts
10,231
The Long Kiss Goodnight - highly underrated action thriller from Renny Harlin, starring Samuel L Jackson and Geena Davis, with a script from Shane Black.

Davis is a school teacher with amnesia, with Jackson playing a PI trying to help piece together her life prior to losing her memory. A car accident begins to reveal Davis' past - a government assassin who survived a botched attempt on her life, but left her with the amnesia. Cue lots of chases and gun fights as the people who tried to kill Davis the first time try to take her out.

Entertaining throughout, Davis and Jackson have a great chemistry, and the former has solid action chops, playing against type.
 

Tarma

Old Man
25 Year Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2001
Posts
10,231
Man On Fire - action thriller from Tony Scott based on the book of the same name, and the second adaptation following, a now, rather obscure take on the source novel which starred Scott Glenn.

This version has Denzel Washington star as Creasy, an alcoholic former CIA operative who takes a job as a bodyguard to a wealthy family in Mexico City, the role focused on protected the young daughter (Dakota Fanning) from kidnappers. When the daughter finally does get snatched, Creasy uses his contacts to track down the gang responsible and eliminate them.

This is a bit of a slow burn, as the first half of the film focuses on establishing Creasy's character, notably his flaws, and the relationship that develops between him and the young girl he's protecting. It's well done though, and there's a strong chemistry between Denzel and Fanning. The action and violence kick into gear once the girl is taken, but there's a subtly to it that you won't usually find in a Tony Scott film. There were some overly stylistic photography flourishes I thought the movie could do without, but other than that Scott gives this depth that some of him other film don't have.

It's a good film, probably about 10 minutes too long, but everyone gives a solid performance, including a more-or-less cameo from Mickey Rourke, and a supporting performance from Christopher Walken.
 

Taiso

lives in his house
25 Year Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2000
Posts
20,302
The Last Temptation of Christ-The roomie and I took this in yesterday morning. It'd been well over 30 years since I'd last seen it.

Obviously, because of who I am today, I have some issues with the film that 24 year old me didn't have.

That said, I think there is a very metatextual narrative to this film that a lot of people may have not picked up on.

First off, being a Christian, I do not agree with the film or novel it's based on as an examination of the life of Christ. And if I'm being honest, I don't think it's meant to be some kind of revelation of the 'historical Jesus' at all.

What I DO think is interesting, however, is the parallel that many Christians have to this Jesus, as historical fiction, in matters of conflict of faith and how we punish ourselves and don't give ourselves the Grace we need to walk in spiritual peace. I think more Christians need to understand this story and see it as a man (author Nikos Kazantzakis) struggling to understand his own relationship with God. I don't think he needed to make Jesus the main character of this story in order for it to still be poignant (see Silence, a more effective story of this type), but the book exists, the movie exists and it does no good to wish it were otherwise.

Dafoe's Jesus blames himself for what happened to Mary Magdalene by not taking her as a wife. His desire to be chaste had nothing to do with God and had everything to do with fear and uncertainty about not hearing God's voice and why it is that he doesn't think he hears it. Scorsese, the director of this film, visited similar themes in his adaptation of Shusaku Endo's excellent novel Silence, about Jesuits that face severe torture at the hands of Japanese samurai and wonder why God isn't saving them. I get the impression Scorsese, a man of faith as far as I know, often struggles with what many describe as God's 'silence'.

There are other subversions of established, canonized scripture in the story, such as Judas being a veritable consiprator in Jesus' martyrdom. Jesus believes he must be martyred on the cross but it's really just hubris because he fears dying and he insists that Judas be the one to betray him to the Pharisees and the Romans because Judas is the only one he can trust with this awful responsibility. Judas, played by Harvey Keitel, is a very rough individual in this interpretation, a zealot tasked with killing Jesus but who ultimately becomes his most loyal disciple.

At the end, Jesus lives in a dreamlike delusion while on the cross where Satan visits him disguised as a guardian angel who tells him that God sent her to take him off the cross and allow him to live a normal life. This is clearly 'the last temptation of Christ', the devil's last shot at corrupting the Son of Man at his most vulnerable state. Here we see a Jesus who is healed from his wounds and his suffering, 'makes it up' to Mary Magdalene by marrying her and attempting to have a family with her ony to see her die before the baby can be born, marrying the sister of Lazarus (who is murdered by the zealots earler in the film to try and suppress the truth of Jesus' divinity) and having a family with her and also making a mistress of Lazarus' wife at the same time. It's a Jesus free of his guilt but also his purity, just another jabroni living a jabroni's misguided 'he gets us' lifestyle right up until the very end. Essentially, Anton Lavey's 'do as thou will' philosophy manifest. The guardian angel tells Jesus 'there is only one woman in all the world. One is as good as another, then.'

He has a chance encounter with his disciple Paul, who tells him that who he is now doesn't matter because they have taken his life and turned it into a myth in order to propagate their messiah narrative. When Jesus says he'll expose their lies because he didn't rise from the grave after three days, Paul tells him it doesn't matter because no one will believe him when compared to the monolith that is Jesus Christ. It's fairly compelling to watch, especially since Jesus believed he was hearing God's voice (in some fashion) for much of the film even though he couldn't understand it. It's only after he gives in to his mortal desires that he stops hearing it.

At the end of the film, as Jerusalem falls in fire and bloodshed as a result of his cowardice and choosing the body over the spirit (something that he railed against for most of the movie), it is a vision of Judas that comes to remind him that he's not supposed to be there and that this is all a lie. He tells Jesus that the guardian angel is Satan, the pillar of flame in the desert, who admits it when he is exposed, believing he has triumphed over God himself. Sensing he still has a chance to make things right, he crawls through the wreckage of Jerusalem and back up to Golgotha to return to the place he was always supposed to be. Waking up, he finds himself once more on the cross, exactly as things should be and he is happy at last. It's an oddly heroic moment of ultimate sacrifice, facing death bravely and with a higher purpose in mind over choosing to right what he mistakenly believes are his own mortal wrongs. Looking up, he smiles and cries out 'It is accomplished!' and then dies. There is a screeching noise at that point, what I can only assume is the voice of God and all the angels as he ascends, and a triumphant song plays out. Jesus overcomes his last temptation.

Again, as a Christian, I can only classify the story as a pure blasphemy and not worthy of the Holy Trinity. But as an examination of our own mortal failings and weakness, I found it utterly fascinating. On that level, I can appreciate the story and its analysis of faith, the weight of one's spirit and what it means to resist temptation rather than clutch at my rosary (despite not being Catholic). At the end, Jesus embraces who he is supposed to be and truly accepts his divine role in the universe. That is an analogy to anyone thinking they are doing God's will before they truly understand it. I also think those that watch this film and feel threatened by it aren't confident in their own faith. That says a lot about how such a film is received.

How strong is your conviction?

I give the film 4 out of 5.
 
Last edited:

terry.330

Fuckin’ Voodoo Magic Mon
20 Year Member
Joined
May 4, 2004
Posts
13,960
Cliffhanger- Part of Stallone’s 90’s ego trilogy along with Demolition Man and Judge Dredd. One thing all 3 movies have going for them is that they are the height of pre CG blockbuster action extravaganzas. While some of the effects are dated it’s still really impressive on a technical level. The on location shooting, stunt work, optical compositing and sets are some of the best ever. They just don’t make them like this anymore.

Plus that stuff is all backed up by a great cast and one of the nastiest performances ever by John Lithgow. Sure aside from the mountain setting it’s not very original and the writing is about as cliche as it gets but it all still works. It’s big, dumb, predictable and it’s still a lot of fun that holds up remarkably well.
 
Last edited:

Tarma

Old Man
25 Year Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2001
Posts
10,231
Cliffhanger is always a good time. Just a shame that the uncut version seems to be locked to Laserdisc.

Top Gun
- speaking of good times, Tony Scott's testosterone soaked aviation action flick from 1986. Still holds up well as a piece of entertainment, and the aerial photography is still amazing, all topped off with an awesome soundtrack.
 

bubba966

Cinema Ninja!,
10 Year Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2013
Posts
1,632
Cliffhanger- Part of Stallone’s 90’s ego trilogy along with Demolition Man and Judge Dredd. One thing all 3 movies have going for them is that they are the height of pre CG blockbuster action extravaganzas. While some of the effects are dated it’s still really impressive on a technical level. The on location shooting, stunt work, optical compositing and sets are some of the best ever. They just don’t make them like this anymore.

Plus that stuff is all backed up by a great cast and one of the nastiest performances ever by John Lithgow. Sure aside from the mountain setting it’s not very original and the writing is about as cliche as it gets but it all still works. It’s big, dumb, predictable and it’s still a lot of fun that holds up remarkably well.
If I'm recalling correctly the stuntman that did the plane to plane zipline stunt got paid $1M to do that stunt which at the time was the record paid to a stunt performer for a stunt. Might still be as I've not heard it being topped.

Always enjoy watching Cliffhanger. Great action & stunts. Lithgow fuckin kills it as he usually does. Kinda scared about how the sequel that's happening is going to be...
 
Top