- Joined
- Dec 29, 2000
- Posts
- 17,832
Given the backlash that Microsoft is getting regarding used games sales etc…is it feasible that one publisher, let’s say Capcom, could handle used games sales on PS4 differently than on Xbone for the same game? Could we see a situation where Resident Evil 7 on PS4 might not have the same restrictions as Resident Evil 7 on Xbone?
If so…that could have major implications for the future relationships with 3rd party publishers. Right now, we are assuming most publishers are in favor of the whole DRM issue…but what happens if they begin to listen to the public and don’t institute it when not necessary. Inherently, right off the bat then the PS4 alternative would be a lot more attractive to consumers. And with the promise of greater sales…wouldn’t it make it more attractive to publishers to focus on the PS4? I mean, isn’t that the whole problem with the Wii U right now? That making games for it is currently not financially attractive to 3rd parties? Could we see the same thing happening to Microsoft?
Well, since we're playing armchair analysts here, and we've been with the hobby long enough to recognize the trends AND some of us actually work in the electronics industry. I will posit my own thoughts.
I don't believe the publishers will implement DRM for one console and then not implement it for the other. They will end up getting pantsed if they do that, and it will be a waste both in terms of money to implement the infrastructure and also the waste in man hours, materials and resources on the DRM console version.
If one console's third party titles will not have DRM and the other one will, vendors like Gamestop and Best Buy are going to hard sell the non DRM console. Everybody everywhere that sells used games as a business model, even down to eBay and Amazon, will work to not only promote the purchase of a console that enables them to keep moving product, but the side effect of this is that it will choke out the DRM console all the more.
DRM is the hot topic in gaming right now. Companies like EA and Ubisoft were able to sort of get away with it because there were always a large variety of options for console gamers to fall back on. But when the options are narrowed down to two, DRM or no DRM, regardless of the publisher, people are going to flock to the option that allows the consumer the greater control with what they purchase. And companies like EA and Ubisoft have to be very careful right now. There is already strong negative sentiment towards them about DRM, and this could only result in more PR damage.
And no matter what anyone tells you, believe this for it is gospel truth and I would swear on it. Companies DO care how they are perceived. They secretly loathe having to do the song and dance for their consumers, but they do it because the damage takes a long time to repair. Nintendo and Sony let their secret loathing out of the bag in previous years and people hated them for it. Now it's Microsoft's turn to take the plunge. Look out below.
Sony even TROLLED better than Microsoft at E3. That whole 'here is how you share used games' video is an amazing flame, one for which Microsoft has no answer. And how does a Japanese company out-troll an American company in this day and age? Sony trolled Microsoft. Microsoft trolled its consumer base.
So I don't think publishers would have a split business model. Whichever console sells more, that is the way the industry will go.
So if you care about ownership of what you buy and don't want to put up with draconian DRM, buy a PS4 and a Wii U and do not entitle Microsoft to have their way with you.
Even this is not a guarantee that you won't see DRM. It may come eventually. But properly, in the right time, when the industry figures out the right way to implement it without burning the whole thing down.
.02
Last edited:



