Civilization Revolution DS (looks like "Civ 1+")

aria

Former Moderator
Joined
Dec 4, 1977
Posts
39,546
Oh snap. I didn't realize this came out on my birthday. I'm debating about getting it --even if

"Civ 1+" is not a bad thing. The IGN video of the gameplay appeared that way.

If this is like the original Civ, it will still be addicting as hell even if it doesn't have all the bells and whistles (which are also great) that were put in II, III, IV (and all of their expansions) and sort of stream-lined for Revolutions.

The reviews (7s and 8s) seem confirm that its more like the original.

Oh shit, this might be the holy grail of travel time wasters for me. Oh god, its full of stars...

Anyone try it?
 

bokmeow

Ned's Ninja Academy Dropout
Joined
Apr 11, 2002
Posts
11,314
If the price is right, I might pick it up. I remember playing this on the PC with my friend, and half the time of spent on the game was to figure out what development goes with which attribute, it was more reading than I bargained for.
 

aria

Former Moderator
Joined
Dec 4, 1977
Posts
39,546
I remember playing this on the PC with my friend, and half the time of spent on the game was to figure out what development goes with which attribute, it was more reading than I bargained for.

Games like this have a slightly higher learning curve (though they've got better over the years about making it more logical), but it really becomes second nature quickly.
 

Mithos

Zero's Tailor
Joined
Dec 2, 2007
Posts
551
I'm interested in the control scheme, that's a big deal for me. Like did they actually manage to make the stylus useful for the game.?
 

aria

Former Moderator
Joined
Dec 4, 1977
Posts
39,546
From videos and reviews it appears they did (mine arrives later this week).

Then again, SimCity DS had good stylus controls but the game was a flawed, pathetic shell of the originals IMO.
 

Gameoz

Crossed Swords Knight
15 Year Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2004
Posts
5,887
I missed this thread. I just traded my copy of Civ Rev DS to GameStop for $11:loco:

I was trading in some other games and the total was higher than I thought it would have been, so I didn't bother to ask what I got for Civ Rev.:oh_no:

I thought it was okay but not really my type of game. If you are into these types of games, I think you will more than likely enjoy the DS version. I am not sure what I was expecting but after playing the PS3 demo, it was just hard to get into the DS version.
 

aria

Former Moderator
Joined
Dec 4, 1977
Posts
39,546
Okay, my DS version arrived last night, played it for a few hours.

[quick aside: did anyone notice that the backs-side of the case insert was the Shepard Fairey designed (a.k.a. Andre the Giant has a Posse) advert poster? I saw something through the holes in the cartridge holder and checked it out.]

I agree with the reviews that place it at 7 or 8. It's enjoyable, but its not quite like any other Civ game out there.

The layout looks a lot like Civ 1 with better graphics. There aren't nearly as many units or techs, but it doesn't seem to harm the game play. I actually found the controls to be very intuitive, the stylus works fairly well and the button commands/d-pad allow you to work surprisingly quickly. So far I've played the Chieftan-level tutorial, and using basic Civ skills its turned into a culture/technology rout for me.

A couple of specific thoughts:
  • The only micromanagment I miss is the ability to have workers or settlers build irrigation, roads, forts, mines, etc as you need them. The game has instead completely automated and streamlined this process into simple commants. I must say it is nice to have roads instantly constructed --though sometimes I'd like to specify the route.
  • All ships but submarines have unlimited capacity(!) This makes staging an invasion much, much more easy than the computer games. There was a nice addition of early boats coming with a platoon of rangers to go and grab gifts seen on shore. It is weird to roll a tank onto a battleship.
  • City defense are still very strong; my green platoon of riflemen got throttled trying to take a city from archers
  • While the game does a good job of describing what buildings and Wonders do, it helps if you've played the series before to know what you want to do
  • the addition of more fabulous secrets (such as finding legendary places like Atlantis) is an interesting addition to get people to explore; you get big bonuses for finding them
  • Great people spawn much faster than in CivIV
  • the bonus you get for being the first person to discover a tech is a nice touch, if you're the first person to discover the tech --I have no idea what that does for play-balance
  • There aren't as many techs, but it works, with 47 it feels closer to the original game
  • You don't seem to be able to chose the victory conditions you want in a regular game (only in a handful of scenarios). This would appear to make the games faster. Some of the new victory conditions are interesting and definitely make the game a bit frantic
  • Diplomacy isn't very strong in this version, much closer to the original Civ1
  • They were able to work in culture, with was a great addition in CivIII
  • There appears to be no sadness penalty for units away from cities; which is welcome but makes the game a bit more combat-friendly
  • The inability to have a diplomatic agreement to cross friendly opponent territory makes attacking other civs (and to a lesser extent exploration) more difficult.
  • The sound and music is good in that it isn't irritating for a game you will play for long periods
  • The graphics are fine; nothing great, but that work for the game
 

rarehero

Rotterdam Nation Resident,
20 Year Member
Joined
Jan 12, 2001
Posts
13,428
wow. seems pretty deep for a ds game.
i still want to get that sim city for the ds.
they should make a starcraft game for the ds.
talk about productivity killers
 
Top