So I watched the fourth season of The Witcher over the course of the past week with the roomie.
It's....fine. It's...okay. Makes a lot of mistakes just as a TV show in general, not just an adaptation of the novels (at which it's terrible).
Liam Hemsworth isn't the worst thing about the season. He's serviceable as a replacement but he can never fill Henry Cavill's shoes. Cavill seemed almost possessed by the spirit of Geralt of Rivia. Cavill was the beating heart of the show. Hemsworth is a transplant-keeps it going but at about half speed. Not that the series was a must watch with Cavill but you always knew he would bring it with every scene he was in and he would fight to preserve the character as he believed it should be played. Which was the correct way.
The biggest problem with the season is the obvious contempt the writers have for the source material and they write it as though 'they can fix it', a problematic attitude that manifests itself far too often in these paltry adaptations. Even if someone hasn't read the books, anyone with even a mildly discerning eye can tell there is an agenda at play here, especially as it concerns the Lodge of Sorceresses. In the source material, they are complex women, fallible, each with their own individual ambitions that often come into conflict with one another. In the books and games, they decide to continue manipulating the rulers of the Continent by advising them, each with their own goals and desires, with a shared endpoint of controlling the entire land for their own aims. But their individual pursuits continue to come into conflict with one another and this causes many rifts and schisms between them but it also makes for some fantastic character driven drama. In the TV show, they're the Sisterhood of the Travelling Pants and lovingly share a common goal. It's such a loss for these characters to be stripped down to the gaslighting of current year feminist tropes. Again, even if you haven't read the books, the circle jerk is on full display.
Meanwhile, other characters have their arcs introduced and resolved in a single episode. Zoltan (who isn't even in the books during these parts of the story) and Yarpen have a long standing beef that is detailed and quashed in a five minute span. It feels like a table scrap thrown to the floor for the fans to eat after the writers have had their way with the material. It's contemptuous. Perceval has no actual reason to even be here at all in the TV version. Look. I'm just gonna say it. Real life dwarves have no business being cast in combat roles in shows like this. They can barely move as it is and it's not even remotely convincing. The guy that plays Yarpen is a small human being unafflicted by dwarfism so he can move around and look convincing when he fights. But when they cast real life people with dwarfism and I'm supposed to somehow believe they're all the same race, I just can't bridge that gap. Lord of the Rings figured out how to do this a quarter of a century ago. Surely those cinematic techniques are only easier to replicate today?
I will give the fight choreography high marks. The fighting in this show, when it isn't stunted human beings wobbling around, is quite impressive and a lot of fun to watch. It is quick, brutal, bloody and visceral. Swords flash, people die, blood spills. It's great, even if the effects for the blood, stabbing and monsters are sometimes painfully mediocre. All the same, the flashy fighting is a blast, and it's a pretty action heavy season. The fight with the ogre on the bridge swinging that triple bladed axe-anchor thing (a malicious and clever device), for all of its visual shortcomings, is still effective even if you have to meet it halfway in your mind.
If there are two bright spots in this season, they are Laurence Fishburne as Regis and Sharlto Copley as Leo Bonhart. When I first saw Fishburne was cast as Regis, I was like 'Netflix gonna Netflix' but in the following months I came to appreciate the decision more and boy, am I glad I did because Fishburne is amazing in the role. Or maybe he's just 'very good' when surrounded by mediocrity. But his Regis is excellent-the man can flat out act and I can't imagine anyone doing a better job at it than him.
Sharlto Copley, however, is fucking INCREDIBLE as Bonhart. This character is an irredeemable bastard but cheese and crackers is he living it up. This man is the most evil fuck I've seen on TV since Ramsey Snow and he enjoys it so much that you can't help but get swept up in it yourself. I found myself waiting for him to say the next brutal jape or inflict the next delightful cruelty on his victim, my popcorn ready. There's a scene where he sees two kids playing with a doll, he walks up to them, asks them who the doll is and when they say the name of the girl he's hunting, he takes it, looks at it curiously, slips it into his belt and walks away from them. He then inflicts voodoo like cruelties on it because he simply can't wait to torture Ciri once he has his hands on her. That's a fucking character, so over the top and loving it that you can't help but find it thoroughly entertaining. I would watch an entire series about this guy. Terrifying charisma.
I lament that we will never see Cavill, as Geralt, interact with Fishburne's Regis or Copley's Bonhart. Those would have been some magnetic scenes.
2.5 out of 5. It had its moments and then it had its 'moments'.