i posted a pic of some chick eating another girls pussy in a 69 position once. while the girl who was on top took a shit on the one on the bottom. did i get banned? no, bobak got mad at me, told me to remove it and that was that. sonic did essentially the same except the main difference is i posted the picture, he just posted the link, what he posted was gross. and whether it's poop eating, necrophilia, animal sex, or something else beyond the realm of normal porn. the fact is it's all about on the same level, and with a link you have a right to click it or not, no one is forcing you to do so. did i think it was gross? not so much, i didn't care. it's not that important. should he be banned for just posting a link? no, he posted a link to something, and that was that. it got removed and now the limits are known. when i posted the chick getting shat on i didn't post a link, i went full frontal on it, and got in trouble for it, but i was never banned. so why should he be banned for just posting a link? fact of the matter is it's offensive, but fuck, everything is these days to someone. just live and let live and don't worry about it. i understand both sides of this case, and i figure it like this:
he's guilty for posting it, but fuck you didn't have to click the links. he even put a not safe for work on it. not much you can do beyond that. is a ban in order? not by a longshot. he's been here long enough to know how to straighten up and fly right. a newer member might not know that it was out of line and keep it up, but he knows and knows how to behave here and a ban isn't in order, perhaps a spanking, or talkin to, but not a ban.
