Bobak said:Looks like the reviews can be summarized as "smart and very violent"
Gameoz said:I had a topic like this back in late April but it has dropped back many pages since then.
I want to like this movie but with no key players from the first being involved, I have a feeling it won't be that great.
Mr.Nemoperson said:I just got back from seeing it. I enjoyed it ALOT.
It does not have the same style as the first, but it definitely holds its own.
They do a little too much with that shaky cam crap (think Borne Supremacy). But it was not too obtrusive. Other than that I thought it was very good. A+
It is kinda sad knowing this movie is going to be overlooked due to the huge blockbusters on the horizon. I think it is way better then Spiderman 3. But I know it won't take in even a fraction of what that movie has made.
And for what it's worth Danny Boyle was an executive producer for this.
electricgrave said:Night of the Living Death (1990)
Well fucking duh! That's way I put the year on it. WHo in hell doesn't know this!Average Joe said:This was a remake as well.
electricgrave said:Well fucking duh! That's way I put the year on it. WHo in hell doesn't know this!
Seriously though, not trying to be offensive, just don't take me for a ride.
BryLmoo said:i thought it was good, but why the bloody hell did they end it the way they did?
another one maybe?
The truth is that I didn't remember the year that DOTD was remade. 2002 isn't it?Average Joe said:It struck me as odd that you would put the year for Night then put "remake" instead of the year for Dawn... just a curious lack of continuity is all.
Setsuna1982 said:28 Years Later