The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey trailer

Dr Shroom

Ol' Stoker likes to toss my name around
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Posts
24,627
Next Decemeber?

Maybe the world really does end and nobody will ever see it...

Oh wait it comes out a week before the world ends, its okay then. :)

Never read the thing, someone shoot me an ebook for it or something.
 
Last edited:

Late

Reichsf?rer-Finnland,
20 Year Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2001
Posts
8,348
Looked like the same armpit fart quality stuff that LotR was, pass.
 

Taiso

No, you may not ask what part of Greece I'm from!
25 Year Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2000
Posts
19,380
The Hobbit will be split into 2 parts, so we might have to wait 2 yrs to see the conclusion.

They're shooting them back to back, and I believe the plan is to release them a year apart, just like the first three movies. So part 1 in December 2012, part 2 in December 2013.

SouthtownKid said:
Oh for fuck's sake, here comes the cash grab. Hobbit isn't even that long of a book. It's shorter than any of the LotR trilogy, which he somehow managed to film each as single movies. The story was pretty well adapted as a 75 minute fucking cartoon. I can't imagine the possible justification for turning this into two movies, other than to draw out the payday.

There was no way this movie wasn't going to be two parts. There is too much money to be made by too many people that all had to agree to let this movie be made. They all have to make their cheddar. Especially after the success of LotR. Really, LotR being such a massive hit was the deathstroke for a 'pure' Hobbit movie ever being made.

I wouldn't be surprised if all the rights holders originally demanded it be blown up to another trilogy and Jackson put the kibosh on it.

This is still going to be great, I think. Jackson has already shown that he understands the material while still working within the boundaries of the movie industry's profit expectations and demands. They're already adding characters and subplots to this in order to play to demographics. And really, after LotR's bank, there is simply no way around it.
 
Last edited:

Spike Spiegel

Onigami Isle Castaway
20 Year Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2001
Posts
13,695
When I was a kid, movies looked like shit, and that's they way we liked it!

For God's sake, I'm shocked that 24 fps has lasted so long. When I was making films, I actually dumbed the frame rate down to 24, just to look professional. That doesn't mean it's better, just something we're used to. I welcome higher fps in movies, and hope this is the sing of the times.
 

norton9478

So Many Posts
No Time
For Games.
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Posts
34,075
2) The movie is being filmed at 48fps. Being a bit of a movie snob, I'd prefer if they stuck to the traditional 24fps.

48FPS is 24 FPSx2.... Will still be screened in 24fps. So, won't really be noticeable.

You ever been to like, Best Buy and gone to the HDTV section? There's usually a tv or 2 (or 10) that is running a movie at 60fps? It looks like shit. I don't want movies to look like some tv soap opera. When ever I watch a movie at home, I make sure it's running at 24fps.

It's the same as turning one season of a show into two, to drag it out and make that money. I'd bitch but I know my punk ass will be there opening day for both

My biggest gripe is that American companies try to make every season 20+ episodes. The product is so much better when you cut it in half.
 
Last edited:

SouthtownKid

There are four lights
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Posts
28,936
There was no way this movie wasn't going to be two parts. There is too much money to be made by too many people that all had to agree to let this movie be made.
With LotR, whatever... but The Hobbit is a childrens story. He should be attempting to create something geared in that direction, something lean and pacey, not some self-indulgent, stretched out and endlessly padded monstrosity that's going to have kids fidgeting in their seats the entire time waiting for it to be over. Twice.
 

norton9478

So Many Posts
No Time
For Games.
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Posts
34,075
Seems like my teachers would show the hobbit cartoon at least a few times a year.
 

aria

Former Moderator
Joined
Dec 4, 1977
Posts
39,546
Look great. Just watched all the extended editions of LOTR for the first time --I can easily see why he wants to make it two movies.
 

SpamYouToDeath

6200|!!|Drillslug Driver
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 3, 2005
Posts
6,228
Hawt!
Only 2 downsides I can think of:
1) The Hobbit will be split into 2 parts, so we might have to wait 2 yrs to see the conclusion.
2) The movie is being filmed at 48fps. Being a bit of a movie snob, I'd prefer if they stuck to the traditional 24fps.

I'm glad to see big-budget movies increasing their framerate. I was quite disappointed to open the trailer and only get 24fps.

(On a related note - I wonder how they're ever going to distribute this on home media. Upconverting to 60fps will look ugly as hell... what, 2-1-1-1-2-1-1-1? I guess in PAL territories they can do the same 4% speedup and get 50fps native, like their TV shows though. Whatever they do, I hope it's not irreversible - I can just set my monitor to 96hz to watch it :drool:)
 

Taiso

No, you may not ask what part of Greece I'm from!
25 Year Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2000
Posts
19,380
With LotR, whatever... but The Hobbit is a childrens story. He should be attempting to create something geared in that direction, something lean and pacey, not some self-indulgent, stretched out and endlessly padded monstrosity that's going to have kids fidgeting in their seats the entire time waiting for it to be over. Twice.

There is no way New Line would allow Jackson to make a property that's STILL as hot as LotR specifically for children. There are too many people that have grown up with LotR just because of the movies and the studio, and all the other people that have a piece of the pie as it concerns a Hobbit movie, are going to want to sell it to those people over and over again. They can't do that if they aren't included in the target audience.

It's all about making a big impression on as many people as possible. Perception is everything, and if the buzz is all positive, from all fronts, that equals more money.

My view:

As long as it's a good interpretation, I'm eminently pleased with it. Regardless of whether or not stretching the length of the story is designed to double their possible profits. Jackson will do it justice.

The only thing that seems odd to me about this trailer is how...well, dashing Thorin looks. I always imagined him being just as much a caricature as the other dwarves. Maybe even MORE 'dwarven,' since he's their leader. Sort of an ultimate expression of the dwarves. But he almost looks human in this. I'm sure it'll be fine. It's jut an observation.

Speaking of dwarves, anybody that likes them should read The Dwarves by Markus Heitz. I know there's a series, but I really liked the first book. It's a bit dark and gory in places, but I thought it was a pretty good tribute to the dwarves, a race that gets mishandled in fantasy stories all too often IMO.
 

cum_drops

Annex Florida Coalition, Goodwill Ambassador,
15 Year Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Posts
3,787
The only thing that seems odd to me about this trailer is how...well, dashing Thorin looks. I always imagined him being just as much a caricature as the other dwarves. Maybe even MORE 'dwarven,' since he's their leader. Sort of an ultimate expression of the dwarves. But he almost looks human in this. I'm sure it'll be fine. It's jut an observation.

Yea, I thought he looked slightly out of place in the trailer also.

Pulled from another site.

thorin_klingon.jpg


images
 

Castor Troy

The Esfinter that theMot Chupame's
Joined
Oct 5, 2008
Posts
3,187
Lol @ my quotes.
Well, I'll try and be optimistic and hope the movie looks good.
 

Tung Fu ru

Actual Musician,
20 Year Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2002
Posts
4,348
Looks pretty fucking badass. Nice to see a preview that shows a little more of the movie.
 

Moon Jump

Alfred Garcia's Butler
Joined
Jun 1, 2003
Posts
5,904
How is he doing this now it's a trilogy then two films? Did he have that much filmed he could put it into three movies or is he just shooting a few extra scenes they thought they couldn't do the first time? The trailer looks like it's going to be a lot of fun. I just hope there's not going to be a long wait between the films.
 

Taiso

No, you may not ask what part of Greece I'm from!
25 Year Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2000
Posts
19,380
Moon Jump:

They added new material and shot too much footage.

They tried to whittle it down to two movies and everyone eventually decided to just make three movies. Probably for artistic and financial reasons. That would be an awful lot of money and art to leave on the cutting room floor.

First movie this holiday season.

Second movie next holiday season.

Third movie following summer (I believe)

So all told, you'll hae to wait 18 months to see the whole thing play out.
 

Hot Chocolate

No Longer Yung, No Longer Raoul,
20 Year Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2002
Posts
10,704
Again I'd bitch but who's gonna be there day 1 for all three?

I just only hope they don't drag out any extended blu ray editions
 

aria

Former Moderator
Joined
Dec 4, 1977
Posts
39,546
They should've made one film for each dwarf. Then a final film tying them all together, Avengers-style, before they start The Hobbit series. Somehow brought in Samuel L. Jackson as some sort of enchanted soothsayer to bind their stories together.
 

norton9478

So Many Posts
No Time
For Games.
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2003
Posts
34,075
They should make a whole movie of Frodo, Sam, Pippen and Merry going through the old forrest and the barrow downs.
 

Taiso

No, you may not ask what part of Greece I'm from!
25 Year Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2000
Posts
19,380
They should've made one film for each dwarf. Then a final film tying them all together, Avengers-style, before they start The Hobbit series. Somehow brought in Samuel L. Jackson as some sort of enchanted soothsayer to bind their stories together.

Ultimate Gandalf?
 

SouthtownKid

There are four lights
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Posts
28,936
Looking at my old responses here, I thought stretching Hobbit to two movies was a cynical cash-grab. I wonder what Past Me would have thought had he known it would be stretched to three movies? Maybe someday I'll read the book again. But I doubt I'll ever be tempted to sit through these movies.
 
Top