I loved the trilogy, so I'll probably enjoy The Hobbit all the same.
I loved the trilogy, so I'll probably enjoy The Hobbit all the same.
Sparing a glaring omission of major plot content (i.e. Peter Jackson's bitch ass omitting The Scouring of the Shire from ROTK), I'll probably enjoy it too.
2) The movie is being filmed at 48fps. Being a bit of a movie snob, I'd prefer if they stuck to the traditional 24fps.
I can think of no good reason why you would prefer that.
I'm amazed most movies are still being shot at 24fps.
There is such a phenomenal jump in quality in video games going from 30 to 60, for instance. I imagine the same must be true for movies.
Oh for fuck's sake, here comes the cash grab. Hobbit isn't even that long of a book. It's shorter than any of the LotR trilogy, which he somehow managed to film each as single movies. The story was pretty well adapted as a 75 minute fucking cartoon. I can't imagine the possible justification for turning this into two movies, other than to draw out the payday.Two parts.
Oh for fuck's sake, here comes the cash grab. Hobbit isn't even that long of a book. It's shorter than any of the LotR trilogy, which he somehow managed to film each as single movies. The story was pretty well adapted as a 75 minute fucking cartoon. I can't imagine the possible justification for turning this into two movies, other than to draw out the payday.
GET OFF MAH LAWN!
Oh for fuck's sake, here comes the cash grab. Hobbit isn't even that long of a book. It's shorter than any of the LotR trilogy, which he somehow managed to film each as single movies. The story was pretty well adapted as a 75 minute fucking cartoon. I can't imagine the possible justification for turning this into two movies, other than to draw out the payday.