Basic Religion Test Stumps Many Americans [part 4281 in "Our Glorious Nation"]

HeartlessNinny

HeartlessNinny

Heartlessness is a virtue
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Posts
14,664
StickmanLoser said:
But beliefs, religious or otherwise have an underpinning that is based purely on personal choice. You can't claim that your beliefs come only from the bible, because you have made an extra-biblical decision that the bible is inerrant. (And of course if the assertion were in the bible, you still at one point chose to make a jump into the logic-loop.) A person similarly chooses, prior to becoming one, that he will embrace materialism.
Click to expand...

*sigh*

Yes, of course that's true. Obviously I've chosen to live my life based on the tenets of science.

But religious faith, as our friend zapatistab has so adroitly demonstrated, is about ignoring facts, not observing them.

As I've said before, I look around at the world and I take what I've learned and a draw a conclusion. Faith doesn't enter into it. The principles I believe in are tested, verified, and, in the end, provable. When I find that I've been wrong about something, I change my mind.

That's not how the religious mind works. They believe what they believe because that's what they've been told. They don't change their minds (or if they do, they tend to abandon their faith in the process).

Clearly it's in the same ballpark, religious belief and belief in science. Both views are about personal philosophy.

But the comparison ends there, because a scientific person and a religious person aren't motivated by the same factors, they don't draw the same conclusions, they don't take the same route to gain the knowledge they have, and they have an entirely different way of testing and proving their beliefs.

In my book, that's not the same thing at all. If you really want to compare me to zapatistab, I'm going to take it as an insult, that's all there is to it.

P.S. I didn't decide the Bible isn't inerrant. Whatever I believe has nothing to do with the veracity of that tome. The Bible isn't inerrant, and demonstrably so. Do you understand what I'm saying? What I have isn't anti-faith, or some other kind of faith, or whatever. What I have is reason. That's not the same thing! Fuck me, why do I have to explain this.
 
Last edited:
evil wasabi

evil wasabi

The Jongmaster
25 Year Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2000
Posts
60,434
zapatistab said:
Slaves in Bible times weren't abused (unless you were Roman) ...they were like maids and nanny's. As far as stoning is concerned...I don't recall people getting stoned and God saying it was OK...If your wife cheated on you...it was OK to divorce her in God's eye's not stone her...
Click to expand...

Slaves didn't write historical texts so of course they weren't abused by their owners. This was all part of god's plan.

Except circumcisions. God wanted people to have circumcisions because he realized he didn't like his original design for penises. But he's still infallable.
 
SML

SML

NEANDERTHAL FUCKER,
20 Year Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2003
Posts
12,796
HeartlessNinny said:
As I've said before, I look around at the world and I take what I've perceived and a draw a conclusion... I judge the principles I believe in to be tested, verified, and, in the end, provable. When I decide that I've been wrong about something, I change my mind.
Click to expand...

Fixed, but with love. <3
 
SouthtownKid

SouthtownKid

There are four lights
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Posts
28,936
HeartlessNinny said:
That's not how the religious mind works. They believe what they believe because that's what they've been told. They don't change their minds (or if they do, they tend to abandon their faith in the process).
Click to expand...

And again with the sweeping (and condescending) generalizations.
 
SouthtownKid

SouthtownKid

There are four lights
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Posts
28,936
What is crazy, Ninny (although you probably have me on ignore by this point), is that if you were to go back and read through this thread objectively, as if you weren't one of the posters involved and didn't have a stake in either side of the discussion, you'd probably see that you've been coming off as the most closed-minded and insulting person in the entire thread.

Every single post you made reads like "Here is a list of reasons why I am not as fucking stupid as you, you slack-jawed, superstitious, primitive screwhead moron." Which you then follow up with a "I'm just trying to understand you" as if that excuses all. You're like Ricky Bobby saying "with all due respect" at the end of a string of insults.

For fuck's sake, the JWs in this thread come off as way more easy-going, laid back and 'live-and-let-live' than you do. They have also handled differing opinions and insults to their opinions WAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYY better than you have. Way fucking better. What does that tell you? Because that shouldn't be happening.

With all due respect; I'm just trying to understand you.
 
Last edited:
genjiglove

genjiglove

So Many Posts
No Time
For Games.
Joined
Mar 17, 2003
Posts
15,080
SouthtownKid said:
primitive screwhead
Click to expand...

Army%20of%20Darkness--article_image.jpg
 
HeartlessNinny

HeartlessNinny

Heartlessness is a virtue
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Posts
14,664
SouthtownKid said:
What is crazy, Ninny (although you probably have me on ignore by this point), is that if you were to go back and read through this thread objectively, as if you weren't one of the posters involved and didn't have a stake in either side of the discussion, you'd probably see that you've been coming off as the most closed-minded and insulting person in the entire thread.

Every single post you made reads like "Here is a list of reasons why I am not as fucking stupid as you, you slack-jawed, superstitious, primitive screwhead moron." Which you then follow up with a "I'm just trying to understand you" as if that excuses all. You're like Ricky Bobby saying "with all due respect" at the end of a string of insults.

For fuck's sake, the JWs in this thread come off as way more easy-going, laid back and 'live-and-let-live' than you do. They have also handled differing opinions and insults to their opinions WAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYY better than you have. Way fucking better. What does that tell you? Because that shouldn't be happening.

With all due respect; I'm just trying to understand you.
Click to expand...

You've made two incorrect assumptions: First, that I have you on ignore. I was just ignoring you. Not the same — though I'm expecting 20 posts to follow on why they're exactly the same, because that seems to be how you think.

Second, that I care about what you think of me. If you think I'm a close-minded jerk, I don't give a flying fuck. Go ahead and think whatever you want.

I already said in this very thread that I know I seldom come off very well in these things. Why, do you think, would I carry on anyway? Clearly I wouldn't if that meant anything to me.

So go ahead and take all your incorrect assumptions (which are certainly not limited to the post I quoted), and shove 'em up your ass. Talking with you has been a waste of my time. With all due respect.
 
SouthtownKid

SouthtownKid

There are four lights
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Posts
28,936
HeartlessNinny said:
Second, that I care about what you think of me. If you think I'm a close-minded jerk, I don't give a flying fuck. Go ahead and think whatever you want.
Click to expand...
Leaving aside everything else for a while, I didn't say I thought you were one, and in fact purposely worded the post to avoid saying that. Just that you've been coming of as one here. Anyhow, just forget it. If you're ever in L.A., let me know and you can come by and sock me in the eye one time and maybe things can go back to normal.
 
SPINMASTER X

SPINMASTER X

I AM NOT FRENCHMAN,, I AM A HUMAN BEING!,
20 Year Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2001
Posts
16,953
I usually go head first into topics like these but It's definitely more fun to act an ass and post stupid replies and pictures.
 
Hidden Character

Hidden Character

Leader of The Hyperstone Heist,
20 Year Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2002
Posts
9,543
I just had a minor skirmish w/my grandmother yesterday morning about my severe lack of church attendance and I'm willing to bet dollars to doughnuts that she would fail even the 6 sample questions in the article.

No church? No problem for this guy.
 
HeartlessNinny

HeartlessNinny

Heartlessness is a virtue
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Posts
14,664
SPINMASTER X said:
I usually go head first into topics like these but It's definitely more fun to act an ass and post stupid replies and pictures.
Click to expand...

Well I'll admit I got a bit annoyed, but I liked the lively debate too. For me the high point was finding out that zapatistab doesn't think slavery is such a bad thing. I'm still trying to wrap my head around that one.
 
qube

qube

Canadian Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Posts
9,110
HeartlessNinny said:
As for the stoning, I guess you'll have to take my word for it, but it's in there. I've read the quote. I forget where it's from though.
Click to expand...

I'm going to stay mostly out of this since I've no desire to get to into this yet again, but I'll help you out with this one.

Leviticus is my absolute favorite book of the Old Testament because it is the most full of hypocrisy when put into modern perspective and is a great book to reference as an atheist making a case against religion. I like the Old Testament because it encompasses all three of the world's largest monotheistic religions, so therefore the hypocrisy applies to all of them when painting with a broad brush, which most of these discussions do. I'm not a New Testament guy :emb:

The quotes you're looking for are.

"And he that blasphemeth the name of the LORD, he shall surely be put to death, and all the congregation shall certainly stone him." - Leviticus 24:16

"Man also or woman that hath a familiar spirit, or that is a wizard, shall surely be put to death: they shall stone them with stones: their blood shall be upon them." - Leviticus 20:27

"Whosoever ... giveth any of his seed unto Molech; he shall surely be put to death: the people of the land shall stone him with stones." - Leviticus 20:2
Click to expand...

/re-shelves his bible (I own 3 actually)

Leviticus is a great book. As a fellow atheist I recommend you arm yourself with its knowledge.

Read the book of Ruth as well, it's actually really good. It's a short read too, so if you're averse to reading religious scripture because of your atheist beliefs it won't be too big of a chore.

Carry on, this thread is pretty good reading.
 
evil wasabi

evil wasabi

The Jongmaster
25 Year Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2000
Posts
60,434
SouthtownKid said:
For fuck's sake, the JWs in this thread come off as way more easy-going, laid back and 'live-and-let-live' than you do. They have also handled differing opinions and insults to their opinions WAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYY better than you have. Way fucking better. What does that tell you? Because that shouldn't be happening.
Click to expand...

Thing is that we have two JWs who are genuinely cool guys here who can be civil more than anyone else. And it's hard to hate them because they're cool. That doesn't mean that they aren't batshit crazy. I really love zapatistab (for being a good member here), but the stuff about blood transfusions is illogical. His reasoning was wacky. And it's not something he came up with, but something that some dude (Russell) came up with. That dude was like L Ron. Hubbard. The dude basically came up with a fear mongering apocalypse scenario that would make Karl Rove cream his pleats.

I get really frustrated with clients sometimes. When my clients are incompetent and can't use their brains to do the simple tasks I ask of them to save their own asses - to just make things right for themselves. But then they can do other stuff like reciting Eminem lyrics, or bible passages. Really. Some people are just nuts. And it drives me nuts.

So when I see people in this thread trying hard to crack these nuts, I empathize. They're basically trying to send lumber upstream in explaining things to people who are brainwashed into believing nonsense. PS, that include you ki_atsushi. Deep down, even you know there's problems with your religion.

The worst thing about ng.c is when people stop caring enough to help break down the walls of ridiculousness in our fellow members, because we heckle each other into a middle line attitude. The even keel is great in real life where people can't handle confrontation, but here we have potential to open people's eyes to things, on their own terms, at their own reading pace.

@heartless - don't stop believing. hold on to that feeling.
 
Nesagwa

Nesagwa

Beard of Zeus,
20 Year Member
Joined
May 17, 2002
Posts
21,322
qube said:
I'm going to stay mostly out of this since I've no desire to get to into this yet again, but I'll help you out with this one.

Leviticus is my absolute favorite book of the Old Testament because it is the most full of hypocrisy when put into modern perspective and is a great book to reference as an atheist making a case against religion. I like the Old Testament because it encompasses all three of the world's largest monotheistic religions, so therefore the hypocrisy applies to all of them when painting with a broad brush, which most of these discussions do. I'm not a New Testament guy :emb:

The quotes you're looking for are.



/re-shelves his bible (I own 3 actually)

Leviticus is a great book. As a fellow atheist I recommend you arm yourself with its knowledge.

Read the book of Ruth as well, it's actually really good. It's a short read too, so if you're averse to reading religious scripture because of your atheist beliefs it won't be too big of a chore.

Carry on, this thread is pretty good reading.
Click to expand...

Ruth is nice because it's just a nice story about the value of charity without ending in smiting because of a technicality in the rules like just about every other book in the old testament. Kind of an odd book surrounded by lists of Judges and what they did and Samuel..... which is also pretty boring.

Song of Solomon is another funny one. The different interpretations of it trying to explain away all the blatant sexual imagery are hilarious.
 
SouthtownKid

SouthtownKid

There are four lights
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Posts
28,936
Nesagwa said:
Ruth is nice because it's just a nice story about the value of charity without ending in smiting because of a technicality in the rules like just about every other book in the old testament.
Click to expand...
Like an ancient times version of Tales From the Crypt.
 
HeartlessNinny

HeartlessNinny

Heartlessness is a virtue
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Posts
14,664
wasabi said:
Thing is that we have two JWs who are genuinely cool guys here who can be civil more than anyone else. And it's hard to hate them because they're cool. That doesn't mean that they aren't batshit crazy. I really love zapatistab (for being a good member here), but the stuff about blood transfusions is illogical. His reasoning was wacky. And it's not something he came up with, but something that some dude (Russell) came up with. That dude was like L Ron. Hubbard. The dude basically came up with a fear mongering apocalypse scenario that would make Karl Rove cream his pleats.

I get really frustrated with clients sometimes. When my clients are incompetent and can't use their brains to do the simple tasks I ask of them to save their own asses - to just make things right for themselves. But then they can do other stuff like reciting Eminem lyrics, or bible passages. Really. Some people are just nuts. And it drives me nuts.

So when I see people in this thread trying hard to crack these nuts, I empathize. They're basically trying to send lumber upstream in explaining things to people who are brainwashed into believing nonsense. PS, that include you ki_atsushi. Deep down, even you know there's problems with your religion.

The worst thing about ng.c is when people stop caring enough to help break down the walls of ridiculousness in our fellow members, because we heckle each other into a middle line attitude. The even keel is great in real life where people can't handle confrontation, but here we have potential to open people's eyes to things, on their own terms, at their own reading pace.

@heartless - don't stop believing. hold on to that feeling.
Click to expand...

Yeah. Like I said, despite my brashness and loudmouth attitude, I don't think that religious people are inherently stupid/evil/whatever. I think some of their beliefs are clearly kind of nuts (the blood transfusion thing is a good example), but that's it.

I don't even know if I'd call it an attempt to 'crack those nuts'. Like I said, for me, the debate is its own reward. When I was asking questions of zapatistab, it wasn't because I wanted to mock him, it was because I wanted to know the answer. And if nothing else, he did indeed come off as a decent guy.

Now, of course I'm dismissive of religious people's beliefs, and of course my tone is usually far from respectful. But I try to avoid asking questions I don't want to hear the answers to.

Naturally I reserve the right to maintain a haughty attitude the whole time. I'm open to having my mind changed and my ideas challenged, but that doesn't mean I'm not confident in their veracity as of right now. :smirk:
 
evil wasabi

evil wasabi

The Jongmaster
25 Year Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2000
Posts
60,434
HeartlessNinny said:
Yeah. Like I said, despite my brashness and loudmouth attitude, I don't think that religious people are inherently stupid/evil/whatever. I think some of their beliefs are clearly kind of nuts (the blood transfusion thing is a good example), but that's it.

I don't even know if I'd call it an attempt to 'crack those nuts'. Like I said, for me, the debate is its own reward. When I was asking questions of zapatistab, it wasn't because I wanted to mock him, it was because I wanted to know the answer. And if nothing else, he did indeed come off as a decent guy.

Now, of course I'm dismissive of religious people's beliefs, and of course my tone is usually far from respectful. But I try to avoid asking questions I don't want to hear the answers to.

Naturally I reserve the right to maintain a haughty attitude the whole time. I'm open to having my mind changed and my ideas challenged, but that doesn't mean I'm not confident in their veracity as of right now. :smirk:
Click to expand...

Dude, if someone could prove to me that vampires and werewolves do not exist, I'd be willing to change my stance. But as far as I am concerned, you can't prove that they don't exist. Therefore they do exist.
 
HeartlessNinny

HeartlessNinny

Heartlessness is a virtue
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Posts
14,664
wasabi said:
Dude, if someone could prove to me that vampires and werewolves do not exist, I'd be willing to change my stance. But as far as I am concerned, you can't prove that they don't exist. Therefore they do exist.
Click to expand...

My god, you're right.

And Thor, Zeus and Osiris all must exist as well! You can't prove they don't!

Holy shit. You just blew my mind, buddy. :eek_2:
 
TerryMasters

TerryMasters

Galford's Armourer
Joined
Apr 18, 2009
Posts
459
Similar to the Global Warming posts, the best part about this thread is watching those who are blind to their own behavior accuse others of doing that which they themselves are doing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top