I was talking about Stephen Hawking who for all his brilliance, is a man who can't even isolate or understand the cause of his own paralysis, let alone an entire fucking universe that is infinitely more vast and complex.
That's kind of silly. Everyone has intellectual strengths and weaknesses. You know like how some people can recite every lyric to Tupac's entire library, but they can't speak English well, much less any other language. We only have so much brain power to focus. That same "idiot" might be seen as a genius if he focused all that time and energy to learning languages.
Or in Stephen Hawking's case...wheelchair theoristITT - Armchair theorists.

Wizzy...you'll never be even 1/100th as educated or intelligent as Stephen Hawking.
You're a legend in your own mind. You can't even spell 'either'.
You can't even see the weakness of your own grammar.And you cant even see the weakness of your own statement.
You can't even see the weakness of your own grammar.
You blab on and on about all these lofty subjects, yet you don't even know what a fucking contraction is. You're an ant imagining itself an eagle.
Id say, I win.
Id say, I win.
The act of compulsion is the best/worst tool to achieve what you desire and it is really a myriad of variables coming together making up a personality type, so long as that compulsion is directed in a positive sense it will eventually end in good things. Of course, it can drive you completely insane too ether expanding or contracting a personality to its roots.
You lack this compulsion[,] and again this is both a good and bad thing, but the willingness to sit there and take the time to poke at people is not only your personality limitation, it also outlines the scope of your intent and limits your learning/adaption capability to only what you can see, which[,] right now, is me, the temporary object of your amusement. And[,] in the end, you will be nothing more then average. An ant[,] if you will, who only sees himself as an ant.
So yabadabado motherfucker.
To sum up, I use your comment as a classification tool, you only get a cheap laugh. Id say, I win.
Does this mean John Connor is safe?
And you cant even see the weakness of your own statement.
You and OE should date. He could be your skinny bitch, while you yelled yabadabado as you plowed his anus full of your man love.
His bedroom walls bore mute witness,
to those many nights where he begged god to heal his muscular dystrophy...
If even for a day...
Of course he isn't necessary, Stephen.
Because of gravity and shit.
Whatever you say, Mr. Hawking.
Humans who don't even understand the inner workings of their own bodies are telling the world how the universe works.![]()
I think I saw that one, too. He also said that maybe no one wanted to come to the party...lol
I'd rather plow your stupid Hmong-diver face with my Nikes.
John Conner wouldn't exist because Reese couldn't go back in time, which means John could never order Reese to go back in time.
I'm sure some Terminatorphile can further logic error this. Considering that is what the entire film is.
I'd rather plow your stupid Hmong-diver face with my Nikes.
In his new book, an extract of which appears in the Times, Britain's most famous physicist sets out to contest Sir Isaac Newton's belief that the universe must have been designed by God as it could not have sprung out of chaos.
My thoughts:
Time is what it is, time.
You can not go back in time, only move forward in time faster than before.
If you wanted to visit a planet that is 1 light year away, if you were traveling at 1000mph you would get there in 5,878,630,000 hours or 73 years to get there so of course you'd have to be 17 years old or younger to see the end of the journey.
But if you find a away to travel faster or instantly you skip that 73 year journey. Folding space or use of a wormhole would get you there instantly. So if 2 17 year old boys left at the same time and one traveled at 1000mph and the other instantly, one boy would have to wait 73 years in order to meet up with the other boy. So in essence he traveled 73 years into the future.
I might have calculated that wrong but you get the drift of it.
Time travel is absolutely possible because every event is not in a series, but rather happens completely in parallel to one another.
nope.
Uh huh.
If you could legitimately disprove that, you wouldn't be wasting your time here. :P
can you prove it?