Stephen Hawking to God: You aren't necessary

Xian Xi

JammaNationX,
15 Year Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2005
Posts
27,762
No, he's not. He's in grave danger since he won't exist now.
 

evil wasabi

The Jongmaster
25 Year Member
Joined
Aug 20, 2000
Posts
60,434
I was talking about Stephen Hawking who for all his brilliance, is a man who can't even isolate or understand the cause of his own paralysis, let alone an entire fucking universe that is infinitely more vast and complex.

That's kind of silly. Everyone has intellectual strengths and weaknesses. You know like how some people can recite every lyric to Tupac's entire library, but they can't speak English well, much less any other language. We only have so much brain power to focus. That same "idiot" might be seen as a genius if he focused all that time and energy to learning languages.
 

Supasaru

Windjammers Wonder
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Posts
1,389
That's kind of silly. Everyone has intellectual strengths and weaknesses. You know like how some people can recite every lyric to Tupac's entire library, but they can't speak English well, much less any other language. We only have so much brain power to focus. That same "idiot" might be seen as a genius if he focused all that time and energy to learning languages.

I tell myself this about myself to help my self esteem.
 

wizkid007

Hyperspin King., Beer Not Included.,
20 Year Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Posts
8,022
Wizzy...you'll never be even 1/100th as educated or intelligent as Stephen Hawking.
You're a legend in your own mind. You can't even spell 'either'.

And you cant even see the weakness of your own statement.

You and OE should date. He could be your skinny bitch, while you yelled yabadabado as you plowed his anus full of your man love.
 

SouthtownKid

There are four lights
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Posts
28,936
And you cant even see the weakness of your own statement.
You can't even see the weakness of your own grammar.

You blab on and on about all these lofty subjects, yet you don't even know what a fucking contraction is. You're an ant imagining itself an eagle.
 

wizkid007

Hyperspin King., Beer Not Included.,
20 Year Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Posts
8,022
You can't even see the weakness of your own grammar.

You blab on and on about all these lofty subjects, yet you don't even know what a fucking contraction is. You're an ant imagining itself an eagle.

The act of compulsion is the best/worst tool to achieve what you desire and it is really a myriad of variables coming together making up a personality type, so long as that compulsion is directed in a positive sense it will eventually end in good things. Of course, it can drive you completely insane too ether expanding or contracting a personality to its roots.

You lack this compulsion and again this is both a good and bad thing, but the willingness to sit there and take the time to poke at people is not only your personality limitation, it also outlines the scope of your intent and limits your learning/adaption capability to only what you can see, which right now, is me, the temporary object of your amusement. And in the end, you will be nothing more then average. An ant if you will, who only sees himself as an ant.

So yabadabado motherfucker.

To sum up, I use your comment as a classification tool, you only get a cheap laugh. Id say, I win.
 
Last edited:

Average Joe

Calmer than you are.
20 Year Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2002
Posts
17,094
Id say, I win.

I don't know...

I've read his comics.

They're pretty sweet.

Definitely much more interesting than anything I've seen come out of you.

If I had to make a vote, I'd lean towards him being the winner.

Winner of what? I don't know. But it doesn't matter. He's still in the lead.
 

SouthtownKid

There are four lights
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Posts
28,936
Id say, I win.

"Id" say? "Id"? Were you born without a little finger on your right hand? Or are you actually referring to the Id, as in the set of uncoordinated instinctual trends? My point is that if you're too lazy even to reach over and use an apostrophe, how is anyone ever going to take you seriously on anything deeper? If you really do think of yourself as some great brain, you are completely sabotaging yourself by writing like a grade school dropout.
 

Supasaru

Windjammers Wonder
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Posts
1,389
The act of compulsion is the best/worst tool to achieve what you desire and it is really a myriad of variables coming together making up a personality type, so long as that compulsion is directed in a positive sense it will eventually end in good things. Of course, it can drive you completely insane too ether expanding or contracting a personality to its roots.

You lack this compulsion[,] and again this is both a good and bad thing, but the willingness to sit there and take the time to poke at people is not only your personality limitation, it also outlines the scope of your intent and limits your learning/adaption capability to only what you can see, which[,] right now, is me, the temporary object of your amusement. And[,] in the end, you will be nothing more then average. An ant[,] if you will, who only sees himself as an ant.

So yabadabado motherfucker.

To sum up, I use your comment as a classification tool, you only get a cheap laugh. Id say, I win.

Are you doing all of that on purpose? Ether? Twice? I don't usually try to pry, but it's pretty obvious you must be missing a few fingers.

In other news, a somewhat worthwhile topic once again rendered to -
Forum-goer A: I has a point!
Forum-goer B: Your point is invalid!
Forum-goer A: Why is my point invalid?
Forum-goer C: lulz
Forum-goer B: Cos I have a different point that doesn't correlate to the first!
Forum-goer A: You're wrong, I win because of incoherent posts maybe a C-C-C-Combo!
Forum-goer C: lulz
Forum-goer B: Fuck you and fuck the original topic of this entire thread! Activate Mundane Thoughts Power! Validated citation needed on your opinion!
Forum-goer C: lulz

Clearly, Hawking was saying that God doesn't exist because....
Red elf needs common sense badly!
Player 6 wins!
Babality!
Marvelous Deadly K.O.!
 

Loopz

Formerly Punjab,
Joined
Aug 16, 2001
Posts
12,871
And you cant even see the weakness of your own statement.

You and OE should date. He could be your skinny bitch, while you yelled yabadabado as you plowed his anus full of your man love.

I'd rather plow your stupid Hmong-diver face with my Nikes.
 

HeartlessNinny

Heartlessness is a virtue
Joined
Sep 16, 2005
Posts
14,664
His bedroom walls bore mute witness,
to those many nights where he begged god to heal his muscular dystrophy...

If even for a day...





Of course he isn't necessary, Stephen.
Because of gravity and shit.


Whatever you say, Mr. Hawking.
:crying:



Humans who don't even understand the inner workings of their own bodies are telling the world how the universe works. :tickled:


Here's some ignorant shit if I ever saw it.

P.S. STK is right. Sorry wizzy. :lolz:
 

SouthtownKid

There are four lights
20 Year Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2003
Posts
28,936
Also, it's "Yabba-dabba-doo." It's hyphenated. And even a 7 year-old should be able to tell you that "yabba" and "dabba" would have to be double consonants. Even if you've never seen it written out, that should be obvious.
 

Spike Spiegel

Onigami Isle Castaway
20 Year Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2001
Posts
13,695
I can't wait to read the book. I still think it's absurd, but if his theory is based on the laws we already know to be true, then what the hell.

And thank you Wizkid for ruining the thread with your nonsense. You are NOT smart, please stop.
 

OrochiEddie

Kobaïa Is De Hündïn
20 Year Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2001
Posts
19,316
I'd rather plow your stupid Hmong-diver face with my Nikes.

Oh what is my ass-hole not good enough?

Fucker.


John Conner wouldn't exist because Reese couldn't go back in time, which means John could never order Reese to go back in time.

I'm sure some Terminatorphile can further logic error this. Considering that is what the entire film is.
 

Supasaru

Windjammers Wonder
Joined
Jun 28, 2010
Posts
1,389
John Conner wouldn't exist because Reese couldn't go back in time, which means John could never order Reese to go back in time.

I'm sure some Terminatorphile can further logic error this. Considering that is what the entire film is.

And the first T800 wouldn't be crushed at the car factory, which means Dyson from SkyNET wouldn't have found the processor or the forearm - even further setting back the war with the machines.
 

not sonic

King of Typists,
15 Year Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2003
Posts
9,327
In his new book, an extract of which appears in the Times, Britain's most famous physicist sets out to contest Sir Isaac Newton's belief that the universe must have been designed by God as it could not have sprung out of chaos.

where did the chaos come from? where do the laws come from?

My thoughts:

Time is what it is, time.

You can not go back in time, only move forward in time faster than before.

If you wanted to visit a planet that is 1 light year away, if you were traveling at 1000mph you would get there in 5,878,630,000 hours or 73 years to get there so of course you'd have to be 17 years old or younger to see the end of the journey.

But if you find a away to travel faster or instantly you skip that 73 year journey. Folding space or use of a wormhole would get you there instantly. So if 2 17 year old boys left at the same time and one traveled at 1000mph and the other instantly, one boy would have to wait 73 years in order to meet up with the other boy. So in essence he traveled 73 years into the future.

I might have calculated that wrong but you get the drift of it.

that only works when you play with the definitions of time travel. thats equivalent to saying someone walking to some place while another drives there is time travel. you could argue that going faster than light makes it time travel but then youre just creating an arbitrary semantics argument.


Time travel is absolutely possible because every event is not in a series, but rather happens completely in parallel to one another.

nope.
 

not sonic

King of Typists,
15 Year Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2003
Posts
9,327
so youre just an idiot creating a circular argument for arguments sake? but then i've read previous posts of yours so that confirms my opinion.

past events influencing the present. events are sequential.
 
Top