Originally posted by Taiso:
<STRONG>I see a lot of 'this guy beat this guy and that guy beat this guy' type of stuff going on around here. Let me interject my thoughts on the whole subject, if you don't mind.
Characters don't HAVE to fight certain other characters to get to the final boss. Not every one of these games uses a tournament for its setting. Not every competition that begins as a fighting tournament ends under the same auspices. I'd be willing to bet that the Capcom writers would say Ryu never fought Alex due to circumstances in the storyline dictating plot twists that insured the two never fought. What those plot twists could is purely speculation.
As I said in another thread with similar subject matter, it's entirely possible that Ryu and Ken could have beaten the crap out of each other so bad when they fought that neither one could continue on, thus clearing the way for Alex.
Or maybe Ryu fought Alex and during the course of the battle the former learned the latter had a burning desire to fight Gill to get some kind of justice for what happened to Tom. I could see Ryu, at that point, graciously stepping aside and saying 'I understand how important this fight is to you. I will not stand in your way.'
Or maybe Ryu went after Gouki/Akuma, leaving Alex to pursue his destiny and face Gill? Let's face it, Ryu probably thinks it's his responsibility to put a stop to Gouki/Akuma before he hurts anyone else. What else would any self respecting heroic character with deep ties to the villain think?
The point is that these storyline contrivances play HEAVILY into fighting game continuity. Over in the 'main swap' thread, I didn't (and still don't) concede anything to Kyo, Rugal or anybody else. Terry, in an opinion that is based on extensive exposure to the source material and spinoffs and heavy research, is the strongest hero in the SNK world. But Kyo makes it to Orochi in the end. How is that possible if Terry's the strongest, the naysayers ask?
Here's how it's possible. Storyline contrivances are concieved and applied in order to elevate the main character of the STORY IN QUESTION to the required dramatic positioning.
I'm not saying Kyo is weak. I'm not saying Alex is weak. Kyo would give Terry a great fight. Alex would give Ryu a great fight. But the new guys, in a straight up one on one, would lose to the more established heroes.
Alex is the main character of SFIII (all incarnations). He is NOT the main character of the SF universe.
Ask yourselves this question as well. Does a fighting game HAVE to only have one story contained in it? I believe Fatal Fury 3, for example, has AT LEAST four stories in it; Terry's battle to keep the scrolls out of the hands of the Jin brothers, which is the most important one. Then there's Hon Fu's pursuit of Ryuji Yamazaki. There's the whole thing about Franco trying to find his son. And what about Geese? He's more of a threat than the Jin brothers in the overall SNK picture, but he's not the last boss.
According to the logic I've been seeing, one would assume that at that point in SNK continuity, the Jin Brothers and Yamazaki are stronger than Geese because they come after him in the game.
To that type of logic I say bunk, tripe and swill
.
Terry fought Geese, who ALSO happened to be trying to get the Jin scrolls at the time. Their paths crossed due to their personal quests necessitating the meeting, but defeating Geese just wasn't the end of the Jin scroll story. There was more to do, and for that reason Terry moved beyond the fight with Geese (which didn't end with a KO, but rather with Geese Tower's pinnacle erupting in flames) and on to Yamazaki, and if you do well enough the Jin brothers.
Being the main character in a game or a series of games doesn't NECESSITATE any character's position in the univerasl heirarchy.
I hope this post is taken only as my attempt to add a new perspective to the debating.
Oh, and Terry's still the strongest SNK hero. That's the only one I'll pick
.</STRONG>