king of fighters 2000 ps2?

$hockwave

Rasputin's Rose Gardener
Joined
Mar 7, 2001
Posts
705
has anyone played it? how does it stack up to the dreamcast port or the original? anything extra not in the dc port?
 

Maury V.

Lucky Glauber's #1 Fan,
Joined
Jan 4, 2002
Posts
5,283
Nah, it's better than the Dreamcast version. They added more and they didnt do that thing where you can go to the past stages.
 

k'_127

NeoGumby's Sycophant,
20 Year Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2002
Posts
6,724
ask devil_gans

it's the best neo port
 

Devil_Gans

Bu, ,
Joined
May 21, 2001
Posts
4,718
Heh, i have said it before and i will say it again.

-better graphics than the DC one
-more polished looking.
-perfect sprites and animations
-more fluid than the DC one.
-transparencies on fireball moves and hit effects.
-shadows look better now.No "blinking" as in the DC/neo versions.
-party mode
-memory mode
-new strikers.Some are interesting especially orochi iori.

This is the closest neo port ever IMO.If they didn't use transparencies, it would have been 100% exact!
Still a nice touch.

The best part:
-no slowdowns or poor frame rates unlike the DC port(aquarium stage and some other stages which i see).
-no loading.
-Iori has his b,b+ B intact.It was removed in the DC version for some really strange reason.Kyo too has his quick backhop back(b,b+ down C).

[ January 10, 2003: Message edited by: Devil_Gans ]</p>
 
Top