Aaaand he's not meeting him anymore.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44242558
Didn't see that coming
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44242558
Didn't see that coming
Ehhhh no.
Branding motivations can be just as bad as political motivations. You never know who is getting paid - in one way or another and not necessarily monetarily - to run a story, whether it's complimenting one brand or disparaging another.
I'm not reading product reviews.
Aaaand he's not meeting him anymore.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44242558
Didn't see that coming
Fake news from the failing BBC... It's back on again!
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-44339003
Is World News becoming a soap opera.
So Trump gave Kim the “legitimacy” (whatever that means in this case) of meeting with a sitting president, and agreed to end war games with South Korea, in exchange for what exactly?
The great negotiator, everyone.
Sounds like we need those 30,000 troops to be in a different country real soon.
What do you mean?
What do you mean what do I mean? You didn't know we have a ton of troops in South Korea?
What do you mean what do I mean? You didn't know we have a ton of troops in South Korea?
Why would "we need" them in another country is what I'm asking.
Were you saying "It sounds like all US troops in SK are going to be removed?"
We don't "need" to have troops in another country as it is, and here we are.
But think of it this way, if the threat is removed, why would they need to be there? Do you think we will just send those people home in the name of peace? No way, we've still got more people to kill on this planet, they'll get moved to a new place.