The Rob Porter Smokescreen

evil wasabi

The Jongmaster
20 Year Member
In the past few days I have been telling people about what I am seeing with this Rob Porter scandal, but just realized I haven't cast my pearls before you lot.

Rob Porter has been accused by his ex-wives of physical abuse. The first one he denied, but the second wife corroborated. It's pretty much accepted widely.

Rob Porter was allegedly dating Hope Hicks. Hope is a good looking lass, and so are Rob's ex-wives. So it shouldn't surprise anyone that he could pull Hope.

But this is happening right after Trump had to deal with the fallout from the book that alleged Trump has been in an affair with someone in the white house.

The immediate misdirection came from Nikki Haley, who frankly, was too old for Trump.

This is the second misdirection - remove the real mistress from the equation by telling the world that the mistress was dating Rob Porter.

Porter is a soldier. Everyone who knows him says that he does what he is ordered to do immaculately.

Porter takes the fall so that Kelly can regain control of the narrative and quash the rumors about Trump that have clearly driven a wedge between POTUS and FLOTUS.
 

fake

King of Spammers
15 Year Member
I mean Porter humping Hicks doesn’t necessarily mean she wasn’t being slobbered on by Trump.
 

oliverclaude

General Morden's Aide
...the fallout from the book that alleged Trump has been in an affair with someone in the white house.

Is this the book in question?

The recent book “Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,” by Michael Wolff, which was met with angry denunciations by the president, linked Mr. Corallo’s resignation to concerns he had about obstruction, but provided no details.

The smokescreen theory is interesting, but the nytimes article puts it in a different frame. If the book "provides no details" about Corallo's resignation, then the book itself seems to be a smokescreen and likely doesn't provide any details at all, turning vital indices into the usual ati-Trump propaganda for the liberal mob.

There's also another concern, as Putin put it in the Stone interview: it's too complicated. Current administration may prove this wrong, though.
 

evil wasabi

The Jongmaster
20 Year Member
Is this the book in question?



The smokescreen theory is interesting, but the nytimes article puts it in a different frame. If the book "provides no details" about Corallo's resignation, then the book itself seems to be a smokescreen and likely doesn't provide any details at all, turning vital indices into the usual ati-Trump propaganda for the liberal mob.

There's also another concern, as Putin put it in the Stone interview: it's too complicated. Current administration may prove this wrong, though.

Did you watch the Stone Putin interview? It was complete garbage.
 

oliverclaude

General Morden's Aide
Did you watch the Stone Putin interview? It was complete garbage.

Not all parts, but the hockey bits and the Strangelove screening ;). It was garbage, possibly intended to be one from the start, but either way, it told us something about Putin, like the fact, that he agreed doing it. His opinion on Snowden was also telling.
 

evil wasabi

The Jongmaster
20 Year Member
Not all parts, but the hockey bits and the Strangelove screening ;). It was garbage, possibly intended to be one from the start, but either way, it told us something about Putin, like the fact, that he agreed doing it. His opinion on Snowden was also telling.

I don't think he agreed to do it as much as he orchestrated it. Putin loves a good fluff piece.

If he could have had the interview on the back of a giraffe, topless, firing a flamethrower at gays, you bet he would.
 

oliverclaude

General Morden's Aide
I don't think he agreed to do it as much as he orchestrated it. Putin loves a good fluff piece.

If he could have had the interview on the back of a giraffe, topless, firing a flamethrower at gays, you bet he would.

You're right. I should've said that the thing he did tell us about himself was, that he can actually pull it off. Not many could, I suppose not even Sacha Baron Cohen.
 

Tacitus

Volatile Memory Construct - SN://0467839
Staff member
I mean Porter humping Hicks doesn’t necessarily mean she wasn’t being slobbered on by Trump.

When your boss refers to you as "the best piece of tail he'll ever get", particularly when you are steaming his pants... I'm pretty sure he's speaking from a position of experience.

0% chance he didn't at least get a handy.
 

evil wasabi

The Jongmaster
20 Year Member
Aaaaaaand she's gone.

My money is on Melania threatening Trump to choose between the two of them.

No matter how hard conservative outlets are trying to push the idea that Nikki Haley was the woman reference in Fire and Fury, everyone knows it was Hicks.
 

oliverclaude

General Morden's Aide
My money is on Melania threatening Trump to choose between the two of them.

No matter how hard conservative outlets are trying to push the idea that Nikki Haley was the woman reference in Fire and Fury, everyone knows it was Hicks.

I agree, both is more than likely and if the next WHCD is an unattractive old geezer -- we'll know for sure ;).
 

fake

King of Spammers
15 Year Member
My money is on Melania threatening Trump to choose between the two of them.

No matter how hard conservative outlets are trying to push the idea that Nikki Haley was the woman reference in Fire and Fury, everyone knows it was Hicks.

But wouldn't Trump pick Hope Hicks if he had to choose?
 

Marek

Banned
Depends on what he’s choosing for.

Fact is, Hope is only as valuable as she is pretty, as far as Trump is concerned. He can always slam younger tail.

Ask Jeff Epstein.

It's just not the same when you have to take Viagra to bang teenagers

The thrill, is gone
 

Fuzzytaco

Long Dong Silver.,
10 Year Member
It's just not the same when you have to take Viagra to bang teenagers

The thrill, is gone

That's probably the only demo he hasn't had to mainline Viagra for. I have no doubt he's gotten a little too "handsy" with Ivanka. It's the blank stare of Baron that's clearly indicative of an autist that's been blown out of a sildenafil induced 60 year old ball sack. Propagating the next wave of aspie, sociopath businessmen.
 
Top