So then I'm a year older than pops, 2 older than you and shroom, and still younger than Rot's backpack.
yarp
So then I'm a year older than pops, 2 older than you and shroom, and still younger than Rot's backpack.
Sessions is already rolling back police violence oversight. You think Gorsuch is gonna stand up to that shrunken voodoo head dixiecrat?
Lolwut your fucking self
Edit: how about that awesome ruling where he supported a company firing an employee for abandoning his broken down trucker rig because he was freezing? Did you like that?
How about the deal in his law school class where he claimed that women lawyers getting sweet lawyer jobs all get knocked up on purpose to abuse the firm for maternity perks?
Drink that kool-aid lithy, the punch tastes nice
Edit2: ok question, if Gorsuch is ok, what is bad in your opinion?
I was lolwut-ing your "loss of police violence and inequality", poor phrasing of your bullet point list. The whole list are such broad categories anyway that you will have to forgive my resistance that everything in all of those categories is going to disappear overnight. It won't.
The trucker decision based on my limited reading, I would tend to side with, he was insubordinate. Life sucks, get a new job and move on.
The other case I am not familiar with yet, will have to look it up later.
Worse than ok would be a fiscally liberal and socially conservative nominee I guess. For Gorsuch, I like some of what I read and don't like some others. I don't think we will be returning to the dark ages because of him, I actually think it was one of the better things Trump has done overall and was kind of a dumb hill for the Democrats to die on.
Of course that is just the new thing. Democrat and Trump did it? Opposed. Republican and Obama did it? Opposed. It is all so stupid.
snip
Look deeper into the trucker case. I have nothing else to say to you about this thread.
Kind of looking like Anthony Kennedy is about to retire.
Turns out Poppy might have been right. Is Gorsuch the beginning of the end for police violence?
https://slate.com/news-and-politics...a-sotomayor-tyson-timbs-civil-forfeiture.html
Turns out Poppy might have been right. Is Gorsuch the beginning of the end for police violence?
https://slate.com/news-and-politics...a-sotomayor-tyson-timbs-civil-forfeiture.html
I see what you did there, but civil asset forfeiture is only related to police violence in the most abstract way imaginable.
<3
Quit moving the goalposts!
As for Gorsuch... I don't know. I can't get too angry about him. Yeah, there have been a couple of bad rulings, he's said and done some questionable things, and it's not "his" seat, etc.
At the same time he's probably the best nominee we could have ever hoped for from Trump. He seems like he might be an upgrade from Scalia.
Y'all Quaeda caved to gay marriage and now this, so I guess theyve given up on gay stuff being a hill to die on. This is a good thing, of course, but it reeks of a public relations stunt.
Perhaps I'm being unreasonably cynical, but it does make me concerned as to what exactly that hill to die on issue will be...2
Abortion?
I wonder if there would be war if Roe v. Wade ever gets overturned.