- Joined
- Nov 5, 2002
- Posts
- 13,559
No, I do care. Based on the posts I've read from you in the past you come across as someone who "gets it" regarding games, and I'm very curious as to what someone who "gets it" sees in these kinds of titles.
appreciate that very much. I guess from time to time I feel reinvigorated enough to delve once more into what is being pushed. to me these type of games that where novel some years back have peaked as far as mainstream interest. so what remains should in theory be rubbish right next to games that have some decent attributes to them.
I feel Huntdown in particular (save for the bipedal robot which I thought moved too smoothly and was too obvious) is playful and tasteful enough to get a preliminary pass. maybe as a kind of joke title. the thing about these games is that they are redundant to an extent - I find it bewildering that they should emulate what was once a push in graphical prowess as somehow this has some merit other than looking 'cool'. if 2D had been 'in' to this day you can bet that the game would have progressed into lush sophisticated animation and graphics unseen today. I'm not sure if I am getting my point across with this? these games sometimes take the piss and it shows, but sometimes it's an honest angle they are approaching things, and here I think it may be the case. it is tongue in cheek, but then tongue in cheek has always been a part of some of the better 2D games.
there is a third category which is when games are so bad they're good and the game makers are deluded and this is something I tend to love. which I kind of see happening in that gng type game.
all the digitized fighting games as well as Shinobi X, some of the silly hacks that came out on the 8 bit nintendo, as well as 'chinese originals' and unofficial conversions, it's all a lot more interesting than the glossy shit made by the big companies. games should never be anything else than quite silly most of the time. in my opinion
that's me though