What is funny about my comment? Are we turning this into a flame war now? Am I supposed to tell you that I think you're a faggot or something because you don't see how arbitrary it is to set the incentives at million dollar increments or whatever?
Only if you really want to I guess, and "When you're backed by Sony, it's totally arbitrary to just ask for an extra million bucks." legitimately made me laugh, but given the context I think I misunderstood what you meant. I thought you were saying sony would just trivially give out a million dollars, no strings attached to it's third party development houses, "all they have to do is ask" due to your focus on money not being an issue once you have sony backing, but you were actually saying that they wouldn't ask sony for such an arbitrary amount of money, which is true. So I guess I
was laughing like an idiot for no reason.
What I'm saying is that, unlike games you've preordered in the past which already have budgets and teams and know exactly how much game they can afford to make, this game does NOT have a set budget yet, it's budget will be determined by fan response (both directly, through kickstarter, and indirectly by the third party funding they'll be able to secure based on the success of that kickstarter) which means there are systems, levels, areas, and features, that may have to be eliminated if the budget ends up being smaller than expected.
So yeah, at the most bare bones budget level required to make the game, there might not be a skill tree.
That said, the actual amounts of the stretch goals could be completely arbitrary, you're not wrong about that, but the need for more money to make them happen is likely legitimate.