AES-style MVS replacement shells preview

shadowkn55

Genbu's Turtle Keeper
15 Year Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2006
Posts
2,386
This is what sent I to the shop for the prototype. I should have a hard sample by the end of the week. I put in screw holes for easy assembly/dis-assembly and added a few aesthetic details.

amvs_1_zpsddf3c613.png


amvs_2_zpsf533c12c.png


amvs_3_zps9466dec7.png


amvs_4_zps4eb702ed.png
 

pixeljunkie

Whilst Drunk., I Found God., Booze = Bad.,
20 Year Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2003
Posts
7,123
Officially want. Any chance in getting specs for the label dimensions? I wanna start mocking them up now.
 

LegoSlug

Over Top Auto Mechanic
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Posts
864
Definitely would buy some, especially for those more expensive carts that have super crappy labels or no labels at all.
 

shadowkn55

Genbu's Turtle Keeper
15 Year Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2006
Posts
2,386
Officially want. Any chance in getting specs for the label dimensions? I wanna start mocking them up now.

The cut out is 99mm x 99mm but to be safe, you should go with either a 97mm or 98mm square. The corners have a radius of 2.5mm.
 

Jonny l3lanka

Morden's Lackey
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Posts
369
Nice.. they should be named CMVS cart shells :) Though I still like the way mvs ones look. Will need to wait until ive seen one in the flesh to compare
 

Xian Xi

JammaNationX,
15 Year Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2005
Posts
27,750
What kind of finish are you doing? I think the same as the Omega would be nice.
 

xsq

Thou Shalt Not, Question Rot.,
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Posts
7,414
certainly looks promising, the CMVS dudes will be all over those ;) as replacment shells these will be nice, can't promise I'd buy some, will have to think about it a bit (I'm actually ok with roughed up carts, as long as the game works...).
 

supergoose

Die Gans,
20 Year Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2001
Posts
4,042
looks promising. i would like to see a few comparison pics with a real home cart next to the prototype.
 

Jonny l3lanka

Morden's Lackey
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Posts
369
Nice but not a fan of the big red brandind/logo.. i think it should be more pure like the AES versions..

nice idea though
 

gegrago

Mr. Big's Thug
Joined
Aug 1, 2011
Posts
200
Wow, looks really nice. I don't know if it is too late but, is it possible to add the hump on the back side? Like the AES carts have. That would break out of the all-square design a little. I know, the shoulders are out of the question.
 

alsmoneo

Krauser's Shoe Shiner
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Posts
241
Wow, looks really nice. I don't know if it is too late but, is it possible to add the hump on the back side? Like the AES carts have. That would break out of the all-square design a little. I know, the shoulders are out of the question.
Man that is sweet looking! The bump on the back side would make it even sweeter (if its not too late)
 

xsq

Thou Shalt Not, Question Rot.,
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Posts
7,414
hm. I doubt the "back bump" would be a good idea for all the folks that have 1slots with horizontal intake (I like and own 2 of those)... Most likely everyone with a MV-1(A), MV-1B, MV-1F(T/S/Z) etc. will have a hard time to insert such a cart without breaking something.

 

Jonny l3lanka

Morden's Lackey
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Posts
369
I'd imagine that might encroach on the space for the boards buddy :-)

Well maybe only just a slight bump... enough to let the board breath.. or maybe just don't listen to me coz I don't know what I'm talking about! :D
 

Jonny l3lanka

Morden's Lackey
Joined
Dec 26, 2012
Posts
369
I'll say this.. this is going to make collecting for neogeo a hell of a lot more confusing especially for newcomers
 

shadowkn55

Genbu's Turtle Keeper
15 Year Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2006
Posts
2,386
Looking great!

How much work would it be to redesign this design into AES format?

If you want it to have the indented shoulders like the AES, a separate mold would have to be cast. If the current design is acceptable, you can get away with making a different pcb spacer if I shrink down the profile of the shell to be the lowest common denominator between the aes and mvs shells.

As for the bump, I decided against it. Adding the bump doesn't play well with stacking and storing of the carts. This isn't an issue with AES carts since the majority of them have their own cases to get a flat surface on both sides.
 

HeavyMachineGoob

My poontang misses Lenn Yang's wang
10 Year Member
Joined
Apr 3, 2011
Posts
5,843
Just wanted to say that on the subject of a "bump" getting in the way of horizontal slot loaders, if the new cart shell design has the label in the same direction as AES carts, the bump would be facing up and the label facing down... Basically, the bump wouldn't be a problem with a front loader, but the label would get scratched up.

On the same token though, having the label facing down is something you have to live with, because if you switched the direction of the label, it would face the wrong way in a vertical loading MVS.
 

gegrago

Mr. Big's Thug
Joined
Aug 1, 2011
Posts
200
As for the bump, I decided against it. Adding the bump doesn't play well with stacking and storing of the carts. This isn't an issue with AES carts since the majority of them have their own cases to get a flat surface on both sides.

Then again, the whole idea of this newly designed cart shells is to embellish the boards themselves! We already have shock boxes (and maybe newly design cases too) that can do the job of flat storage. Maybe if you do a consumer poll will give you a better idea of what the market wants.
 

xsq

Thou Shalt Not, Question Rot.,
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Posts
7,414
Just wanted to say that on the subject of a "bump" getting in the way of horizontal slot loaders, if the new cart shell design has the label in the same direction as AES carts, the bump would be facing up and the label facing down... Basically, the bump wouldn't be a problem with a front loader, but the label would get scratched up.

On the same token though, having the label facing down is something you have to live with, because if you switched the direction of the label, it would face the wrong way in a vertical loading MVS.
good point, didn't take that into account. To avoid scratching the labels too much one could perhaps add some soft plastic foil (e.g. from an antistatic bag) to the "slot guide"... will have to try that out.
 
Top