- Joined
- Feb 25, 2004
- Posts
- 7,632
I'm so sorry bro. My fault. >_<
I looked at your sig and all was forgiven
I'm so sorry bro. My fault. >_<
Saw Pet Semetary 2019.
The movie was okay, but the ending gave a complete sense of dread that I haven't felt since The Witch.
Better then the 1989 version for certain.
Transparent attempt to gaslight me.
But I'm serious. I want to know more about the Hollywood brown hatin' gay mafia.
One of us IS drinking tonight, but I don't think it's me.
Taiso, I have avenged you: http://www.neo-geo.com/forums/showt...to-be-around&p=3569288&viewfull=1#post3569288.
Looks more like suck it, world.Suck it, Johnson.
Looks more like suck it, world.
The first Disney movie was safe and relied completely on triggering nostalgia, with nothing new happening and nothing new to say.
The second one overcorrected and relied completely on subverting expectations rather than playing to them the way the first one had, and almost everyone hated it.
So there can be no doubt they will overcorrect again back the other way, and this one will push every nostalgia button in your head, do nothing new whatsoever and be the safest, most predictable movie ever, undermined further by its absolute desperation. Star Wars is dead, has been dead, and this is them pissing all over the grave and trying to convince you it's a spring rain. Well go drink it all in, you sad people who can't accept it's over.
Nocturnal Animals
Two stories in one really. A woman in high society surrounded by the fakest people imaginable gets a manuscript in the mail from her college sweetheart, 20 years after leaving him. The manuscript is titled with the nickname he had for her, and dedicated to her. The story inside is of a guy and his family who get attacked in the middle of Texas while on the way to Marfa ("what the fuck is in Marfa?!" my reaction, "Prada?"), and how the husband tries to live following it.
It's important to remember that this is a movie by Tom Ford, who is a premier fashion designer, so this movie could be visually something. But for the most part, it's ok. While certain scenes feel like a David Lynch movie, such as the camera following the paved road, or the desolate settings in West Texas, the ambiance reminds me more of Schnaubel's Diving Bell and Butterfly, in how sad it is.
This was one of the better stories I have seen in film in years. Probably not for most of you guys, but for me, it was a beautiful movie. 4/5.
The Last Shift - strong atmosphere throughout and quite good for the first 2/3 or so, then it pretty much completely biffs the landing.
You're putting me in the position of hating the first two Disney episodes, which is not what that post was. It was a description of Disney's approach and the general reaction. I was fine with the movies for what they were, what has soured me on the franchise was the fandom post-Last Jedi combined with this movie's obvious caving to those fans.You take Star Wars a little too seriously. It must suck to not be able to just sit back and enjoy a stupid adventure movie.
You're putting me in the position of hating the first two Disney episodes, which is not what that post was. It was a description of Disney's approach and the general reaction. I was fine with the movies for what they were, what has soured me on the franchise was the fandom post-Last Jedi combined with this movie's obvious caving to those fans.
So you'd rather them lean into the Flying Princess Leia and Force Ragamuffin and SJW Umpa Lumpa threads as opposed to going back to JJ's Star Wars?
I'd argue there's a difference between being "held hostage to fan demands" and subtly admitting that you made a mistake(s). Any pre-established commercial property has some responsibility to the people that made it popular in the first place if they continue to wish to print money in the future... and Star Wars is the most commercial of commercial properties. It survived for 15 years without a film (and then another 10+) solely on the back of endless merchandising and licensed (extended universe) and unlicensed fan-fiction.
A large portion of the Star Wars fandom has hated/been disappointed by Star Wars for the last 20 years. Acting like the "entitled fan" thing is somehow new is hopelessly naive. The only reason it's such a thing now is entertainment media is constantly trying to drum up outrage and paint impotent nerd outrage on social media as some kind of societal evil.
I can totally see Billy Dee Williams kicking the bucket as well.
There's nothing subtle about that episode title. That title says, "We'll do anything you want-- just please stop hating us." It's as subtle as a $2 hooker on fire, waving a brick above her head and hollering.I'd argue there's a difference between being "held hostage to fan demands" and subtly admitting that you made a mistake(s).
If you think Disney is going to dare let JJ kill Lando at this point, you're not fucking paying attention. Anything that could possibly make a fan mad or sad now is completely off the table.Yeah, I fear Lando will get claimed by the Reaper too. Hopefully Chewie walks away from the last film in the new trilogy unscathed, but, more likely, he and Lando will probably go out in a spectacular Millennium Falcon fireball together.
There's nothing subtle about that episode title. That title says, "We'll do anything you want-- just please stop hating us." It's as subtle as a $2 hooker on fire, waving a brick above her head and hollering.
And no, the entitled fan thing is nothing new. I can't figure out what you're looking at that makes you think I said it was. What's new in terms of Star Wars is Disney flinching and caving. Fine, they made mistakes, whatever, but putting the fans in the driver's seat is always worse.
I was fine with the movies for what they were, what has soured me on the franchise was the fandom post-Last Jedi combined with this movie's obvious caving to those fans.
If you think Disney is going to dare let JJ kill Lando at this point, you're not fucking paying attention. Anything that could possibly make a fan mad or sad now is completely off the table.