U.S. Senate delares U.S. soil "Battlefield" to get around that pesky "Habeas Corpus"

Senate Votes To Let Military Detain Americans Indefinitely, White House Threatens Veto -Huffington Post

Well, we're behind Soviet Russia, Nazi Germany, and Communist China in the concentration camps department. Maybe now is the time to catch up? The OWS people would be the first to go in, obviously.

Keep doing this and one day the US soil will really become a battlefield once again.

Well, in Mussolini's fascist Italy the goddamed trains ran on time!

...and the Nazis were such snappy dressers. The DHS couldn't hold a candle to the Schutzstaffel's keen fashion sense. I mean... if the jackboot fits...

-sigh-

When's the revolution?

maddening

what's worse is that I imagine a lot of the yokel Tea Partiers would be for it, too

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lithy

When's the revolution?

---

Probably when the President signs the bill in to "law."

Will there be a rule of law at that point?

Surprising this passed the Dem. controlled Senate, but then again given the two-party dictatorship it's not.

Time to stock up on ammunition :emb:

I wrote this Haiku about the suspension of Habeus Corpus during the Civil War some time ago:

Habeas corpus
Lincoln suspended that writ
new birth of freedom

teehee!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lagduf

Surprising this passed the Dem. controlled Senate, but then again given the two-party dictatorship it's not.

---

"Most Democrats voted against the provisions but only two Republicans voted nay — despite the fact that it is the Republicans more than the Democrats who talk about the importance of abiding by the Constitution. The two Republican Senators who have both read and respected the Constitution of the United States and therefore voted against the travesty were Mark Kirk of Illinois and Rand Paul of Kentucky."

It was a Republican who signed in to law the Minimum Age Drinking Act of 1984.

A clear trampling on the State's rights. Why do these morons revere Reagan again?

All of them are idiots.

Quote:

---

"The enemy is all over the world. Here at home. And when people take up arms against the United States and [are] captured within the United States, why should we not be able to use our military and intelligence community to question that person as to what they know about enemy activity?" Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) said.

"They should not be read their Miranda Rights. They should not be given a lawyer," Graham said. "They should be held humanely in military custody and interrogated about why they joined al Qaeda and what they were going to do to all of us."

---

Seriously, fuck Lindsey Graham.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-QiZcVRbAeM

oh man 1984 was a good book. don't know if that's what op intended but it brought back some memories.

Everyone was at an Occupy Wallstreet rally when the government snunk this one through.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Abasuto

...when the government snunk this one through.

---

"Snuck"?--The last time I checked, the government doesn't have to answer to us! :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zero Satori

"Snuck"?--The last time I checked, the government doesn't have to answer to us! :(

---

ahahahahahahah

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Zero Satori

"Snuck"?--The last time I checked, the government doesn't have to answer to us! :(

---

Sneaked.

Snuck is slang.

Snuck sneaked in to the English language.

Would be an interesting day indeed when members of congress are declared enemy combatants. :-J

Yeah that's great...not a "democracy" anymore, but a fucking BATTLEFIELD.

Are these elites really that stupid?
We, the working class are the buffer zone between them and the unwashed savages who would bust into their gated communities, kill their body guards, loot the place, fuck their daughters and eat their pets.

If they want to start rounding up ANYBODY they label a "terrist", snatching them from their beds in the middle of the night and sneaking them into secret jails over nothing....go ahead and be my fucking guest: I already know where this is going.


America and it's annexed state of Canada is gonna be a shithole banana republic in no time.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lagduf

Sneaked.

Snuck is slang.

Snuck sneaked in to the English language.

---

But what is snunk?

Horsedick.

I often contemplate leaving this country before things get "bad"...but then I wonder, where would I go? At the end of the day, is there a better place than the usa? Each country has pros and cons.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lithy

But what is snunk?

---

A cross between a snake and a skunk. XD

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by lithy

But what is snunk?

---

Fluid that dips out of Skookie's lady-bits?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lagduf

It was a Republican who signed in to law the Minimum Age Drinking Act of 1984.

A clear trampling on the State's rights. Why do these morons revere Reagan again?

All of them are idiots.

---

Ugh, terribly executed plan. Essentially paying a mobster for "insurance".

I still remember when we (Louisiana) were the only state where the minimum drinking age was 18. Right up until 1995. Then about a year later it was raised to 21, lowered for three months back to 18, and then up to 21 again. Can you imagine how much that would've sucked if you were 18 in 95?

The US has always been at war with itself it seems. :)

A confederacy will be established within the US borders in, oh, let's give it fifteen years.

After it's all said and done: Can love truly bloom on the Soccerfield?

relevant article:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_a...crackdown.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by PleaseKillMeNow

A confederacy will be established within the US borders in, oh, let's give it fifteen years.

---

Doubtful.

Anything other than full scale resistance will be crushed unless those fighting against the state receive significant help from 3rd parties.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IcBlUsCrN

oh man 1984 was a good book. don't know if that's what op intended but it brought back some memories.

---

Of the four books that make of the "distopian trilogy": A Brave New World, Fahrenheit 451, and 1984 + Animal Farm (where Animal Farm is the metaphorical prequel to 1984), Animal Farm is by far the most accessible, most instructive, and least turgid. 1984 is a good read and rather though-provoking, but to me, to be frank, the last third of the book is incredibly boring torture-porn.

The point is: The United States has been in a constant state of war for the last ten years, (or arguably since 1991 with the first and second gulf wars, or 1945 the start of the Cold War and the emergence of the U.S. as a superpower, or even 1941 with death of U.S. isolationism/non-Interventionism).
This constant "war footing" is incredibly corrosive to civil liberties, in that, to quote Göring: "the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country." That was the whole POINT to the never-ending war between Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia: any sacrifice by the people is justified to win the (unwinnable) war (à la, our unwinnable wars on concepts: like terror or drug use).

Meanwhile, here in the real world, with the war in Iraq nearly over and Afghanistan winding down, a new "enemy" must be found, but unless Venezuela and/or Iran step up to the plate... to paraphrase Pogo: "We have met the enemy and he will be us." and thus the need to declare U.S. soil a "battlefield"

James Madison is rolling in his grave, desperately trying to reanimate himself through the sheer force of his undead will [and super brain powers] so he can erupt from the grave to shout for all across the Union to hear "I told you so."

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Father of the Constitution

Of all the enemies of public liberty, war is perhaps the most to be dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies. From these proceed debts and taxes. And armies, debts and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the dominion of the few.... No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.

---

Meanwhile John Quincy Adams calls out from the beyond, to say "Listen to this Madison motherfucker, he knows what's up. HOLLA!" He then reminds us:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Son of the Atlas of Independence AKA John Jr.

[America] is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion and vindicator only of her own. She will commend the general cause by the countenance of her voice, and the benignant sympathy of her example. She well knows that by once enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication, in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy, and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standard of freedom. The fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force.... She might become the dictatress of the world. She would be no longer the ruler of her own spirit.... [America’s] glory is not dominion, but liberty.

---

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ybvbnqatz1w

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NeoTheranthrope

Of the four books that make of the "distopian trilogy": A Brave New World, Fahrenheit 451, and 1984 + Animal Farm (where Animal Farm is the metaphorical prequel to 1984), Animal Farm is by far the most accessible, most instructive, and least turgid. 1984 is a good read and rather though-provoking, but to me, to be frank, the last third of the book is incredibly boring torture-porn.

The point is: The United States has been in a constant state of war for the last ten years, (or arguably since 1991 with the first and second gulf wars, or 1945 the start of the Cold War and the emergence of the U.S. as a superpower, or even 1941 with death of U.S. isolationism/non-Interventionism).
This constant "war footing" is incredibly corrosive to civil liberties, in that, to quote Göring: "the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country." That was the whole POINT to the never-ending war between Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia: any sacrifice by the people is justified to win the (unwinnable) war (à la, our unwinnable wars on concepts: like terror or drug use).

Meanwhile, here in the real world, with the war in Iraq nearly over and Afghanistan winding down, a new "enemy" must be found, but unless Venezuela and/or Iran step up to the plate... to paraphrase Pogo: "We have met the enemy and he will be us." and thus the need to declare U.S. soil a "battlefield"

---

I have been saying that with American and western society in general, Brave New World is the most accessible. We are given things to distract us from the real issues. Sedated by commercialism.

Not to take away from Animal Farm which is a great book. I feel like that aspect of society is just one more layer of the "entertainment" that helps create schisms in society to distract us from the underlying conflicts.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by NeoTheranthrope

Of the four books that make of the "distopian trilogy": A Brave New World, Fahrenheit 451, and 1984 + Animal Farm

---

1. Dystopian

2. Tetralogy

3. Why those four? What merit is in Animal Farm that is not in We or Kallocain or, hell, Anthem?


Don't be fooled, those praising Obama for threatening to veto. His objections lie only in the bill's presumption of Congressional powers he considers to belong exclusively to the Executive.

I still think it's frightening that Lincoln suspended habeas corpus.

awwww but I bet Lincoln had good intentions :(

You're retarded.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lagduf

I still think it's frightening that Lincoln suspended habeas corpus.

---

Yeah, okay fine, then I think it's even more frightening that Adams (sr.) and Jefferson suspended habeas corpus FOREVER for the hundreds of slaves they owned themselves, not to mention the however many thousands of others over however many generations made and kept legal thanks to that great "Covenant with Death", the Constitution you always love quoting and mentioning.

Double Plus Good. Eastasia... though about the time I was six in 1984 I believe it was Eurasia, but people who kept saying that were taken away. I keep saying East Asia, but I'm told that I'm mistaken and we've always been at war with... I demand a proper Pastrami Sammich BEFORE yelling B.B. at the top of my lungs with everyone else in about an hour.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SouthtownKid

Yeah, okay fine, then I think it's even more frightening that Adams (sr.) and Jefferson suspended habeas corpus FOREVER for the hundreds of slaves they owned themselves, not to mention the however many thousands of others over however many generations made and kept legal thanks to that great "Covenant with Death", the Constitution you always love quoting and mentioning.

---

John Adams didn't own slaves.

Now you want to talk about a frightening law under the Adam's administration we can look at the so called "Alien and Sedition Acts."

But Sedition was a crime until something like 1919 IIRC (definitely until the 20th century) until the Court altered it's view on what the 1st Amendment actually protects.

I think you have me for Constitutional literalist. I'm not. That's absurd. None of the Revolutionary Generation were perfect, but they created a fantastic document, and believed in many just principles concerning freedom and rights that are reflected in the Constitution. Knowing that perhaps nothing can be set in stone the document they created to be the foundation of our state also has a means to alter itself, and each in time in history it has been amended it has been for the better. The founders aren't some deities I hold on high, they were men (mostly) with their own flaws, who produced a flawed document. But that document is a living document. It's not unchangeable text we worship.

The history of the United States is largely the history of our struggle to achieve that "more perfect Union." It is unfortunate that our struggles for freedom often have a paradoxical element to them where our stated values are frequently at odds with our actual actions...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lagduf

John Adams didn't own slaves.

---

whoops.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by SouthtownKid

whoops.

---

Washington and Jefferson owned enough for him too, it's ok. Honest mistake (4 of the first 5 Presidents owned slaves.)

Adams is underrated.

Looks like most of the Presidents around during the time of Slavery owned slaves at some point.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Mike Shagohod

Double Plus Good. Eastasia... though about the time I was six in 1984 I believe it was Eurasia, but people who kept saying that were taken away. I keep saying East Asia, but I'm told that I'm mistaken and we've always been at war with... I demand a proper Pastrami Sammich BEFORE yelling B.B. at the top of my lungs with everyone else in about an hour.

---

1. Don't ever go into room 101.

2. Don't ever forget about the anti-sex league that formed on Airstrip One.

3. CHORIZO THUNDERCRACK fo' PressyDent.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lagduf

John Adams didn't own slaves.

Now you want to talk about a frightening law under the Adam's administration we can look at the so called "Alien and Sedition Acts."

But Sedition was a crime until something like 1919 IIRC (definitely until the 20th century) until the Court altered it's view on what the 1st Amendment actually protects.

I think you have me for Constitutional literalist. I'm not. That's absurd. None of the Revolutionary Generation were perfect, but they created a fantastic document, and believed in many just principles concerning freedom and rights that are reflected in the Constitution. Knowing that perhaps nothing can be set in stone the document they created to be the foundation of our state also has a means to alter itself, and each in time in history it has been amended it has been for the better. The founders aren't some deities I hold on high, they were men (mostly) with their own flaws, who produced a flawed document. But that document is a living document. It's not unchangeable text we worship.

The history of the United States is largely the history of our struggle to achieve that "more perfect Union." It is unfortunate that our struggles for freedom often have a paradoxical element to them where our stated values are frequently at odds with our actual actions...

---

Samuel Adams on the other hand, made money off of slavery.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by norton9478

Samuel Adams on the other hand, made money off of slavery.

---

and beer.

BREAKING NEWS!

Pat Benatar declares LOVE IS A BATTLEFIELD

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjY_uSSncQw

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Agent Sands

and beer.

---

Not really IIRC. He inherited a Brewery. I think he may have sold it. That said many of the founders did run their own breweries including Washington on his estate.

Thomas Paine owned no slaves and used all the profits from Common Sense to fund the war effort.

Oh, so they passed the bill LOLZ.
It's really gonna suck when all these pigs come back to the sty.

At least in America you have enough privately owned weapons to go around: gives you guys a fighting chance against these gun-toting hillbilly, Christian supremacist, child rapers the government will turn lose on y-- I mean the terrists.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spoon

Oh, so they passed the bill LOLZ.
It's really gonna suck when all these pigs come back to the sty.

At least in America you have enough privately owned weapons to go around: gives you guys a fighting chance against these gun-toting hillbilly, Christian supremacist, child rapers the government will turn lose on y-- I mean the terrists.

---

Don't forget Blackwater has a new name...Xe pronounced "Zee."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xe_Services

We should really not re-elect anyone who voted for this.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Lagduf

Don't forget Blackwater has a new name...Xe pronounced "Zee."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xe_Services

---

Xtian
Extremists

Quote:

---

The suit also alleges that Blackwater employees used three company aircraft to kidnap Iraqi citizens from Iraq and further accuses the company of engaging in weapons smuggling, money laundering, tax evasion, child prostitution, illegal drug use and destruction of evidence. The child prostitution charge refers to young Iraqi girls allegedly being brought to the Blackwater compound in Baghdad's fortified Green Zone, identified in the lawsuit as the "Blackwater Man Camp," to provide oral sex to contractors for $1. If the court rules against Xe on the racketeering account, it could dissolve the company.

---

One can dream.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Spoon

Xtian
Extremists

---

LOL!

:buttrock:

Forced prostitution is slavery. Slavers should get the death sentence, but since I'm against the death penalty, life in some shithole prison will have to do. Maybe I'll have to make an exception.