- Joined
- Oct 11, 2004
- Posts
- 14,455
Venom! Hate! Malice!
But surely everyone deserves a second chance, no? Dude served his time?
But the motherfucker killed dogs! And he had a rape stand! (oh come on, who doesn't have a rape stand! Wait, nevermind that last part.).
Anyway, yes or no, you think Mike Vick should have been allowed back into the NFL? As of right now, he's a member of the Philadelphia Eagles, can participate in all functions except for games, and he's cleared for games after week 6. NFL reinstatement is contingent upon good behavior per Commissioner Goodell's say so. Contract with the Iggles is for $1.6 mil this year, team option for $5.2 next year, very incentive based.
But that's all just gibberish. The question stands apart, I suppose- YES means you agree that he should have been allowed back. NO means he should have been banned for life. Ain't no compromises, ala Stallworth (and soon-to-be Plax) type one year off shit.
But surely everyone deserves a second chance, no? Dude served his time?
But the motherfucker killed dogs! And he had a rape stand! (oh come on, who doesn't have a rape stand! Wait, nevermind that last part.).
Anyway, yes or no, you think Mike Vick should have been allowed back into the NFL? As of right now, he's a member of the Philadelphia Eagles, can participate in all functions except for games, and he's cleared for games after week 6. NFL reinstatement is contingent upon good behavior per Commissioner Goodell's say so. Contract with the Iggles is for $1.6 mil this year, team option for $5.2 next year, very incentive based.
But that's all just gibberish. The question stands apart, I suppose- YES means you agree that he should have been allowed back. NO means he should have been banned for life. Ain't no compromises, ala Stallworth (and soon-to-be Plax) type one year off shit.