White House to forcast record defecits

aria

Former Moderator
Joined
Dec 4, 1977
Posts
39,546
YES!!

The days of big government sure are over!

See? Bush proved you can cut taxes while increasing spending to insane levels! There are no repercussions at all.

At least the richest in the country are paying some of the lowest taxes among us. They shouldn't pay any of it.
 
Joined
Feb 4, 2001
Posts
4,209
Bobak said:
YES!!

The days of big government sure are over!

See? Bush proved you can cut taxes while increasing spending to insane levels! There are no repercussions at all.

At least the richest in the country are paying some of the lowest taxes among us. They shouldn't pay any of it.

The irony of the Democrats having a "lower the deficit" feels...wrong. :(

But hey, that's how it is.
 

slerch666

updyke,
Joined
May 23, 2002
Posts
8,984
I feel tax should be set to a percentage, and not a stepping percentage, just a percentage. Say like 10%-%15 for everyone. Rich pay more, poor pay less, but it's as far as it will get.

Does it surprise me that they are reporting record deficit? Hell no. 2 wars in 4 years. Creating the 'Dept of Homeland Security.' Cutting taxes and giving everyone $300. Yeah, that was all cheap shit.

Does it surprise me that the Republican run White House is waiting until after the DNC to report this? Nope. Would it change the DNC? Nope. Everyone already knows it's a record defecit, why would they need officinal statements to back it up? You'd have to be retarded not to know it's a record defecit.

That's what happens when the monkeys rise to rule.
 

JHendrix

Jello Pudding Pop, Y'know? Like that whole Bill C
Joined
Jun 27, 2001
Posts
9,436
Deficits I could forgive in the wake of 9/11 and the War in Afghanistan and in Iraq (flawed as that one was).

However, not pulling back most of the tax cuts after all that went down is rather dumb.

Fiscal responsibility, why have the "conservatives" forsaken us? Kerry sounds good now, but who doesn't when they're campaigning. I don't know if I trust him to follow through on it.
 

Tacitus

Volatile Memory Construct - SN://0467839
Staff member
Joined
Apr 26, 2002
Posts
15,120
slerch666 said:
I feel tax should be set to a percentage, and not a stepping percentage, just a percentage. Say like 10%-%15 for everyone. Rich pay more, poor pay less, but it's as far as it will get.

Does it surprise me that they are reporting record deficit? Hell no. 2 wars in 4 years. Creating the 'Dept of Homeland Security.' Cutting taxes and giving everyone $300. Yeah, that was all cheap shit.

Does it surprise me that the Republican run White House is waiting until after the DNC to report this? Nope. Would it change the DNC? Nope. Everyone already knows it's a record defecit, why would they need officinal statements to back it up? You'd have to be retarded not to know it's a record defecit.

That's what happens when the monkeys rise to rule.



Funny, the only person that was campaigning that initiative was panned by everyone a few years ago.

Republican Steve Forbes.
 
Joined
Feb 4, 2001
Posts
4,209
VanillaThunder said:
Funny, the only person that was campaigning that initiative was panned by everyone a few years ago.

Republican Steve Forbes.

Yeah, Bush beat out the conservatives in that race. And what did we get? A big spending warmonger. Sucks to be us, right?
 

johnroche

Pao Pao Cafe Waiter
Joined
Sep 13, 2003
Posts
1,780
VanillaThunder said:
Funny, the only person that was campaigning that initiative was panned by everyone a few years ago.

Republican Steve Forbes.
I think I remember that, and the big thing was that it was at or near the highest percentage, or at least more than the lowest bracket was paying. So, there was the impression that the lower and middle classes were getting soaked. At least, that's how I vaguely remember it. It was 8 years ago after all.
 

aria

Former Moderator
Joined
Dec 4, 1977
Posts
39,546
johnroche said:
I think I remember that, and the big thing was that it was at or near the highest percentage, or at least more than the lowest bracket was paying. So, there was the impression that the lower and middle classes were getting soaked. At least, that's how I vaguely remember it. It was 8 years ago after all.

It was a long time ago, but I know what you and VT are talking about.

As I recall, and its a little fuzzy for me too, one of the potential strengths of a flat tax was the rich wouldn't be able to use multiple tax loopholes to lower their taxes to ultra-low levels (like many do now). The flip side was "what if they don't successfully close the loopholes", in which case the rich would end up hosing the poor again.
 
Joined
Feb 4, 2001
Posts
4,209
Bobak said:
It was a long time ago, but I know what you and VT are talking about.

As I recall, and its a little fuzzy for me too, one of the potential strengths of a flat tax was the rich wouldn't be able to use multiple tax loopholes to lower their taxes to ultra-low levels (like many do now). The flip side was "what if they don't successfully close the loopholes", in which case the rich would end up hosing the poor again.

Yeah, but the tax code could use some KISS principle influence, no?
 

Bluevoodu

Kyokugen's Student
Joined
Aug 22, 2001
Posts
3,189
Last year's deficit was $375 billion, the worst ever in dollar terms. The White House has said the numbers are manageable because they only equal about 4 percent the size of the U.S. economy -- well below the 6 percent ratio reached under President Reagan.

that is a good explanation right there.

Values of the US dollar are different now.

still... its a bad number... but things are not as bad as what people think.

those who say the economy is not turning around.... cannot be looking very hard. here at our accounting firm. We can tell things are picking up for people.
For some other industries its still somewhat hard... but things are picking up.



†B†V†
 

Loopz

Formerly Punjab,
Joined
Aug 16, 2001
Posts
12,871
The economy may be 'picking up' for large companies' bottom line, but wages remain completely flat and stagnant. Unemployment is still pretty damn high, and people cannot just quit work to obtain training to get those mythical higher wage jobs that we are still losing since our workforce remains largely unskilled.

Until this gap in skills and low wages is remedied, any recovery will be shaky and shallow. GWB doesn't have a fucking clue what to do about this, other than cling to that completely irresponsible tax cut that only serves to get himself elected. We'll all end up footing the bill later on. GOP=fucking stupid these days.

I've always disagreed with the GOP on social issues, but at least they used to be fiscally responsible. Between the Bible thumping and debt raising, they're no friends of mine. I'll take care of my own mortal fortitude, mkay? Thanks.
 
Top