Bobak said:YES!!
The days of big government sure are over!
See? Bush proved you can cut taxes while increasing spending to insane levels! There are no repercussions at all.
At least the richest in the country are paying some of the lowest taxes among us. They shouldn't pay any of it.
slerch666 said:I feel tax should be set to a percentage, and not a stepping percentage, just a percentage. Say like 10%-%15 for everyone. Rich pay more, poor pay less, but it's as far as it will get.
Does it surprise me that they are reporting record deficit? Hell no. 2 wars in 4 years. Creating the 'Dept of Homeland Security.' Cutting taxes and giving everyone $300. Yeah, that was all cheap shit.
Does it surprise me that the Republican run White House is waiting until after the DNC to report this? Nope. Would it change the DNC? Nope. Everyone already knows it's a record defecit, why would they need officinal statements to back it up? You'd have to be retarded not to know it's a record defecit.
That's what happens when the monkeys rise to rule.
VanillaThunder said:Funny, the only person that was campaigning that initiative was panned by everyone a few years ago.
Republican Steve Forbes.
I think I remember that, and the big thing was that it was at or near the highest percentage, or at least more than the lowest bracket was paying. So, there was the impression that the lower and middle classes were getting soaked. At least, that's how I vaguely remember it. It was 8 years ago after all.VanillaThunder said:Funny, the only person that was campaigning that initiative was panned by everyone a few years ago.
Republican Steve Forbes.
johnroche said:I think I remember that, and the big thing was that it was at or near the highest percentage, or at least more than the lowest bracket was paying. So, there was the impression that the lower and middle classes were getting soaked. At least, that's how I vaguely remember it. It was 8 years ago after all.
Bobak said:It was a long time ago, but I know what you and VT are talking about.
As I recall, and its a little fuzzy for me too, one of the potential strengths of a flat tax was the rich wouldn't be able to use multiple tax loopholes to lower their taxes to ultra-low levels (like many do now). The flip side was "what if they don't successfully close the loopholes", in which case the rich would end up hosing the poor again.
Last year's deficit was $375 billion, the worst ever in dollar terms. The White House has said the numbers are manageable because they only equal about 4 percent the size of the U.S. economy -- well below the 6 percent ratio reached under President Reagan.