US government faked Bush news reports

Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Posts
15
Chris Tryhorn
Tuesday March 16, 2004

TV news reports in America that showed President George Bush getting a standing ovation from potential voters have been exposed as fake, it has emerged.
The US government admitted it paid actors to pose as journalists in video news releases sent to TV stations intending to convey support for new laws about health benefits.

Investigators are examining the film segments, in which actors pretending to be journalists praise the benefits of the new law passed last year by President Bush, to see if they could be construed as propaganda.

Two of the films are signed off by "Karen Ryan", who was an actor hired to read a script prepared by the government, according to production company Home Front Communications.

Another video, intended for Hispanic viewers, shows a government official being interviewed in Spanish by a actor posing as a reporter with the name "Alberto Garcia".

One segment shows a pharmacist telling an elderly customer the new law "helps you better afford your medications".

"It sounds like a good idea," the customer says, to which the pharmacist replies, "A very good idea."

And in some scenes President Bush is shown receiving a standing ovation from a crowd cheering him as he signed the Medicare law, which is designed to help elderly people with prescriptions.

The government also prepared scripts to be used by news anchors. "In December, President Bush signed into law the first-ever prescription drug benefit for people with Medicare," the script reads.

"Since then, there have been a lot of questions about how the law will help older Americans and people with disabilities. Reporter Karen Ryan helps sort through the details." The "reporter" then explains the benefits of the new law.

Lawyers from the investigative arm of Congress discovered the tapes as part of an investigation into federal money that was used to publicise the new law.

They will be keen to ascertain whether the government might have misled viewers by failing to reveal the source of the videos, which were broadcast in Oklahoma, Louisiana and other states.

"Video news releases" of this sort have been used in the US since the 1980s, but the way they blur the lines between news and advertising troubles many media experts and campaigners.

The government defended the videos, which Democrats described as "disturbing". "The use of video news releases is a common, routine practice in government and the private sector," a health department spokesman told the New York Times.

VNRs are also used in Europe but a furore surrounding a Greenpeace video package about its campaign to prevent the dumping of Shell's Brent Spar oil platform sent to British broadcasters some years ago led to new rules clamping down on their use.

Greenpeace's sophisticated media offensive - including the provision of emotive film footage of its occupation of the platform - resulted in one-dimensional coverage by BBC and ITN, news chiefs admitted at the time.

Guidelines were subsequently drawn up to label video news releases as such - a category which the regular Osama bin Laden videos now fall.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uselections2004/story/0,13918,1170535,00.html

***

When an administration turns real policy into fraudulant, entertaining supplication---its time to shed the skin of your political party and progress.
 

galfordo

Analinguist of the Year
15 Year Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
18,418
Big deal - this is common practice for both sides. People <3 scandals. Next.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Posts
15
galfordo said:
Big deal - this is common practice for both sides. People <3 scandals. Next.

Your response is very typical and accentuates the weakness in your way of thinking.

Political sides are used to mask agendas. Liberal ideals battling Conservative ideals...it's a neverending fight that CLOUDS the minds of the public. Constant bickering between polar opposites simply slows down real progression---instead, the nation gets compromise.

The way you jumped into to defend conservatives, justifying their actions against those of liberals, proves the point wholly.

I find it so interesting how weak people cling to a political party so desperately---as if they owe something to that party. That sort of thinking is sheepish...and it's costing people their freedoms.

Freedom is all that really matters.
 

galfordo

Analinguist of the Year
15 Year Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
18,418
Patrick Riot. said:
Your response is very typical and accentuates the weakness in your way of thinking.

Political sides are used to mask agendas. Liberal ideals battling Conservative ideals...it's a neverending fight that CLOUDS the minds of the public. Constant bickering between polar opposites simply slows down real progression---instead, the nation gets compromise.

The way you jumped into to defend conservatives, justifying their actions against those of liberals, proves the point wholly.

I find it so interesting how weak people cling to a political party so desperately---as if they owe something to that party. That sort of thinking is sheepish...and it's costing people their freedoms.

Freedom is all that really matters.

Yeah, well, you just wrote three paragraphs but never even attempted to address why this article you posted is so important. You've been watching too much c-span (i.e. the hot air channel).

How did this turn into a fight for freedom?
 

Dallas_Five

Terry Bogard's Taylor
Joined
Feb 14, 2004
Posts
1,691
pimpnx.jpg
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2004
Posts
15
galfordo said:
Yeah, well, you just wrote three paragraphs but never even attempted to address why this article you posted is so important. You've been watching too much c-span (i.e. the hot air channel).

How did this turn into a fight for freedom?

If you want to begin discussing the psycho-sociological impacts and effects of media [specifically television] on the masses --- coupled with the idea of government exploitation these effects to further their own agenda --- I'd be more than happy to discuss it with you.

PS: I bolded what my original post, to any intelligent individual, should've implied. If you would like me to continue bolding key points of the discussion to make them easier to understand, please, let me know. If so, I'll send a message to the administrators and ask them to enable the Font options so that I can instead highlight important passages.
 

galfordo

Analinguist of the Year
15 Year Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
18,418
Patrick Riot. said:
If you want to begin discussing the psycho-sociological impacts and effects of media [specifically television] on the masses --- coupled with the idea of government exploitation these effects to further their own agenda --- I'd be more than happy to discuss it with you.

I still don't see where you wrote that.

Patrick Riot said:
PS: I bolded what my original post, to any intelligent individual, should've implied. If you would like me to continue bolding key points of the discussion to make them easier to understand, please, let me know. If so, I'll send a message to the administrators and ask them to enable the Font options so that I can instead highlight important passages.

Better yet, you could try to write down just what's necessary to get your point across. No one likes to wade through pontification just to figure out what someone's trying to say.
 

Awakened1

Zero's Secretary
Joined
Nov 9, 2001
Posts
148
Yea, no shit. The media is nothing but a weapon of mass distraction. Freedom and individuality is all that really matters.

Politicians are greedy and selfish. The propaganda they spew forth on mass media has nothing to do with the issues at hand. Most people are ignorant about what's going on.
 
Last edited:

bokmeow

Ned's Ninja Academy Dropout
Joined
Apr 11, 2002
Posts
11,314
Faked is such a harsh word. Can't we just say the Bush administration lied?
 

Crovax

Rasputin's Rose Gardener
Joined
Aug 9, 2002
Posts
701
Patrick Riot. said:
Your response is very typical and accentuates the weakness in your way of thinking.

Political sides are used to mask agendas. Liberal ideals battling Conservative ideals...it's a neverending fight that CLOUDS the minds of the public. Constant bickering between polar opposites simply slows down real progression---instead, the nation gets compromise.

The way you jumped into to defend conservatives, justifying their actions against those of liberals, proves the point wholly.

I find it so interesting how weak people cling to a political party so desperately---as if they owe something to that party. That sort of thinking is sheepish...and it's costing people their freedoms.

Freedom is all that really matters.

Well said and welcome to the boards. I think you'll find Galfordo will likely be your mortal enemy when it comes to political issues--and they DO come up rather often here. Political leanings aside, he's not so bad though.
 

Buro Destruct

Formerly known as, Buro Destruct, , Southtown Stre
Joined
Jul 27, 2002
Posts
9,058
Not really that new to me. I saw an article about this about a month and a half ago. galfordo's actually right.



For once.
 

galfordo

Analinguist of the Year
15 Year Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
18,418
Crovax said:
Well said and welcome to the boards. I think you'll find Galfordo will likely be your mortal enemy when it comes to political issues--and they DO come up rather often here. Political leanings aside, he's not so bad though.

I try my best not to hold grudges due to differences in the political forums - even after they get ugly. Glad to know that you still <3 me Crovax :D.
 

TheBigBB

Formerly known as dmhawkmoon
Joined
May 5, 2002
Posts
6,152
damn i take back anything good I ever said about galfordo. Patrick Riot , your words are too intelligent for this guy. Apparently he will justify anything his party does. If it was something wrong, he pretends like it doesn't matter and places the burden of proof on everyone else. Prove it's true, prove it means anything, tell me why it's important, etc etc. I thought it was a really interesting thing to read about, myself. Is that a good enough fucking reason? Don't click the thread or reply if you don't. Easy? I'll probably have to stick you on the ignore list, seeing as you feel the need to make every other post in every thread, even when you have nothing new or good to say.
 

Buro Destruct

Formerly known as, Buro Destruct, , Southtown Stre
Joined
Jul 27, 2002
Posts
9,058
dmhawkmoon said:
damn i take back anything good I ever said about galfordo. Patrick Riot , your words are too intelligent for this guy. Apparently he will justify anything his party does. If it was something wrong, he pretends like it doesn't matter and places the burden of proof on everyone else. Prove it's true, prove it means anything, tell me why it's important, etc etc. I thought it was a really interesting thing to read about, myself. Is that a good enough fucking reason? Don't click the thread or reply if you don't. Easy? I'll probably have to stick you on the ignore list, seeing as you feel the need to make every other post in every thread, even when you have nothing new or good to say.
lmao, Okay, I understand as much as the next guy how fucking ignorant, brainless, and totally irritating galfordo CAN be. But seriously, give it to the guy when its DUE.

He said BOTH sides play this game (they do). Granted one of those sides is his beloved Republican party, but seriously, you make it seem like the Dems are the saving grace of this country. Electing John Kerry is only going to stave off the collapse of the American Empire a few years more.
 

Scuz39

User title.,
Joined
Oct 24, 2001
Posts
356
Galfordo let me see if I can clear up what Patrick Riot is trying to say.

I think what he is trying to get across is that when you saw information on something that republicans did that I think we all can agree is pretty wrong you leap to their defense because democrats do it too... What he is trying to point out is that to believe in a 2 party system is to believe in the (among other) fallacy. That at all times no more then 1 of the parties will be corrupt and that the people will actually vote for the non corrupt one. It doesn't matter that Democrats did it too because they also suck and to suggest that one side doing something wrong is balanced out by the other side doing wrong is a slight against all of the other possible sides there are to an issue.
 

Buro Destruct

Formerly known as, Buro Destruct, , Southtown Stre
Joined
Jul 27, 2002
Posts
9,058
Scuz39 said:
Galfordo let me see if I can clear up what Patrick Riot is trying to say.

I think what he is trying to get across is that when you saw information on something that republicans did that I think we all can agree is pretty wrong you leap to their defense because democrats do it too... What he is trying to point out is that to believe in a 2 party system is to believe in the (among other) fallacy. That at all times no more then 1 of the parties will be corrupt and that the people will actually vote for the non corrupt one. It doesn't matter that Democrats did it too because they also suck and to suggest that one side doing something wrong is balanced out by the other side doing wrong is a slight against all of the other possible sides there are to an issue.
Thats no exccuse to fucking leap on the guy. He's only offering the other side of a two sided and very BORING argument.
 

roker

DOOM
20 Year Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2003
Posts
20,006
and they've flouridated the water

it's an element of mind control
 

galfordo

Analinguist of the Year
15 Year Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
18,418
dmhawkmoon said:
damn i take back anything good I ever said about galfordo.

NOOOOOOoooooooo!!!!!! :crying: :crying: :crying:

Well, I still <3 you dm ;).

dmhawkmoon said:
Patrick Riot , your words are too intelligent for this guy. Apparently he will justify anything his party does. If it was something wrong, he pretends like it doesn't matter and places the burden of proof on everyone else. Prove it's true, prove it means anything, tell me why it's important, etc etc. I thought it was a really interesting thing to read about, myself. Is that a good enough fucking reason? Don't click the thread or reply if you don't. Easy? I'll probably have to stick you on the ignore list, seeing as you feel the need to make every other post in every thread, even when you have nothing new or good to say.

OMFG!!! :eek: :eek: :eek:

I ask people to provide evidence to support the venom and conspiracies they spew out on a regular basis???!!! I can see how that could easily drive people nuts.

But seriously, is it so horrible to challenge someone's argument? That's why you post in a place where people can give you feedback, right? If you can't handle people asking why you wrote something, then forums are probably a bad place to post your opinions - particularly political, since people seem to hold them sacred.

Just my opinion.
 
Joined
Feb 4, 2001
Posts
4,209
How to be galfordo

Step 1: Whenever the Republicans do something good, compliment them.

Step 2: Whenever the Democrats do somewthing good, downplay it.

Step 3: Whenever the Democrats do something bad, highlight it.

Step 4: Whenever the Republicans do something bad, claimt he Democrats do it to.

Step 5: If all else fails, demand your opponent provides evidence or links. Never do so yourself.

Step 6: as a last resort, spam up the thread with needless and aimless posts to try and distract it fromt he subject at hand, and raise post count.



Seriously, the bush administration is such a rotting fungus I hope it's unraveled before the party is unsalvagable.
 

BeefJerky

Gnomesayin?
25 Year Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2001
Posts
13,561
jethrek said:
How to be galfordo

Step 1: Whenever the Republicans do something good, compliment them.

Step 2: Whenever the Democrats do somewthing good, downplay it.

Step 3: Whenever the Democrats do something bad, highlight it.

Step 4: Whenever the Republicans do something bad, claimt he Democrats do it to.

Step 5: If all else fails, demand your opponent provides evidence or links. Never do so yourself.

Step 6: as a last resort, spam up the thread with needless and aimless posts to try and distract it fromt he subject at hand, and raise post count.



Seriously, the bush administration is such a rotting fungus I hope it's unraveled before the party is unsalvagable.

Jesus H. Right on da money..
 

galfordo

Analinguist of the Year
15 Year Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2003
Posts
18,418
So now the quintessential Democratic fanboy chimes in, with cute little bashings but sans argument as always. Thanks but no thanks.
 
Joined
Feb 4, 2001
Posts
4,209
galfordo said:
So now the quintessential Democratic fanboy chimes in, with cute little bashings but sans argument as always. Thanks but no thanks.

Nothing's more Democrat than a McCainist right? But thanks for reminding me...

Step 7: If a conservative who wants Bush to fry- something that is obviously impossible- steps up, quickly remind him that he's a liberal and a democrat. Sicne everybody knows those are commies it'll detract fromt hem.




You've never provided an argument in the past, but spammed endlessly. You haven't provided an argument in this thread, either. Do so before you whine.
 

Scuz39

User title.,
Joined
Oct 24, 2001
Posts
356
Buro Destruct said:
Thats no exccuse to fucking leap on the guy. He's only offering the other side of a two sided and very BORING argument.

I wasn't making excuses for anyone, I was just trying to clarify... but whatever.
 
Top