aria
Former Moderator
- Joined
- Dec 4, 1977
- Posts
- 39,546
slerch666 said:Gee, I wonder why they hate Americans.![]()
Though, if the driver was a taxi driver and he assisted the theft, or was responsible for the theft... well, you get what you deserve. But I suppose it could also be argued they needed fire wood since THEIR FUCKING ELECTRICTYprobably DIDN'T FUCKING WORK!
Well, whatever.
galfordo said:It's practically impossible to tell who's really at fault in any of these situations. You just never get the whole story.
Temjin said:Wy cant the iraqis just be happy, I mean I bet before the war you could steal all the wood in the world and you wouldnt get punished at all. Now look at the great coalition forces upholding the law, making sure people cannot steal wood.
Hurray for justice.
BlackSpy said:So you're suggesting that perhaps the soldiers did the right thing?
Hidden Character said:Bobak, how many points was that worth again?
Perhaps if you have a car in Iraq in you make a living a from it, ie, you become a taxi driver?Shirt in a Can said:I shit you not this is about the fifth time I've heard officially published instances of tankers crushing the cars of looters, and EVERY SINGLE TIME the claim afterward was that the owner was a taxi driver. It reminds me of on every episode of cops when they find drugs on somebody it's always "some guy gave it to me, i didn't know what it was" to save themselves immediate incrimination (in their minds). I know, not the same situation at all, but you get what I mean. Just the fact that the criminal always has the same exact excuse.