ttooddddyy
PNG FTW,
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2001
- Posts
- 8,335
US marines have agreed a framework plan to withdraw from the besieged Iraqi city of Falluja, says the local American military commander.
X said:They could take the city very easily if they were not so many non combatant fatalities.
Not so hot? How about they do not want civies dead.
GunstarHero said:No way man...you don't even know the bottomless pit of evil that these guys draw their hate from...its so fucking obvious....the US military has been over there for the sole purpose of killing women and children....and BABIES...they especially like killing little babies...just ask Charlie Rangle....I mean, he's in Congress and he said thats what we're doing there...shit man I have no choice but to believe that...besides...its so obvious anyway, if you just open your eyes man...open your eyes to the truth and you will be enlightened...
But whats really happening now is that the US military machine finally killed all the babies in the city...mission accomplished...well we may return to the city after some geologic surveys uncover more oil for us to plunder...but let's not get to far ahead of ourselves....anyway like I said...its sooooo obvious man, I wish more people would just open their eyes to the truth...the pieces are all there for you to draw your own conclusion, but if you are one of the 'smart' ones you will see the light and will come to the only possible reality which I believe.
lithy said:Just gonna say that its pretty impressive that we go in under the context of 'the Iraqis are too opressed to fight for their own independence' then we get there and they do a pretty good job of getting us to leave. So does this mean Iraq government was stronger than the US military or does it mean that maybe they happened to be content under their former ruler.
StickmanLoser said:Military strength is not the only disincentive to revolution.
GunstarHero said:??? do I sense the beginning of another America hate thread? Sweet...let me continue with the ultimate conclusion....
Gunstarhero: Oh my god George Bush sucks....Oh my God he is so fucking retarded...chimpy and his fucking oil brigade really fucked up now, and I got the proof right here![]()
Random Guy: Oh man, I couldn't agree more, in fact you took the words right out of my mouth, so I'll just leave my opinion in your hands...right on...GWB sucks teh cawk!
Random Guy2: (Gunstarhero's post quoted)....oh man you really hit the nail on the head, awesome post.
There that should sum things up....I'm teh fooking prophet!!!
lithy said:Nice try at blowing it out of proportion but fact is winning a battle is being able to NOT kill civilians.
ttooddddyy said:US marines have agreed a framework plan to withdraw from the besieged Iraqi city of Falluja, says the local American military commander.
lithy said:You're right the other, as I mentioned, would be being content with the current political situation of the country.
come from!? I miss old envy.StickmanLoser said:Galfordo:![]()
.X said:They could take the city very easily if they were not so many non combatant fatalities at risk.
Not so hot? How about they do not want civies dead.
GunstarHero said:no...you are totally right man, because seriously....with today's technology, WAR is a videogame man....those troops have so much gear and high tech equipment...shit man...I wouldn't be suprised if they had a freaking PAUSE button equipped with them man...so they could stop and think and freeze the fucking bullets wizzing by....you're right...war is only won when there are zero civilian casualties....fucking genius...
ttooddddyy said:I do not hate the US or any other country for that matter, I happen to love America.
galfordo said:FYI: The title of this thread makes you sound just a little on the resentful side. People who "love America" usually don't take pleasure in its military defeats. Then again, these are strange times.
lithy said:Minimalizing civilian casualties is a must when these are the people you are trying to win the minds of. Trying to get them to think that we are there to liberate them while we blow them up is kind of counterproductive.
As the moral superpower we think we are we should be working a little harder at fighting a moral war.
lithy said:It is possible to love America and be critical of her.
galfordo said:You're right. We should work harder. But to pretend that we're killing civilians on purpose, or that we're even not considering them when we make military strikes, is clearly not what the numbers show. If these slimebags wouldn't hide behind women and children in crowded cities, there wouldn't be nearly as many civilians casualties. I blame them for the majority of these deaths.