"Last Will and Testament" fell a bit short as I think Geese would have been more professional in writing his will, but then again this -is- Geese we're talking about. But would he let his empire fall apart or would he leave it to his underlings?
Well, considering some of his estate could not be placed in a legal will ("And to Uncle Joe I leave my cocaine distribution network - try not to sneeze.")...
Try thinking about the two following ideas, then re-evaluate it:
1) Kain/Grant's endings in Mark of the Wolves. Survival of the fittest? Did Geese subscribe to that ideaology? He was married to Kain's sister, right? And one could argue that is how he got to where he was - by being the strongest, smartest, most ruthless, etc.
2) Is it a set of instructions upon death, or musings concerning the subject?
Of course, poor execution is poor execution. In hindsight, I think I was a little too heavy handed in writing the piece. I do think, however, that Geese would've been likely to let everything go straight to hell - it makes sense to me:
1) Could this be written under the assumption he would either go missing or fake his own death? If so, it would be a very good way to see who his real friends/enemies were (didn't Machivelli recommend this?)
2) Billy might be #2, but that doesn't mean he would want to be number #1. Big would probably go out on his own, or try and take over. I can't think of any other actual subordinates that could fill those shoes. Rugal was independant, so was Krauser. They're more "equals," anyhow (although I'm sure none of them would agree to that!)
3) The Roman and Greek Empires aren't around anymore, but we still remember them. I'm sure Alexander the Great and the Chinese Dynasties haven't been forgotten either (they just didn't teach their histories at my school). How about Al Capone? I'd imagine the Southtown Syndicate would be the same way.
I'm trying to get back into writing...there should be more later! BTW, what did you think of "No Rush?"