Ban Nesagwa

Mushiki

flaming petrosexual,
15 Year Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2003
Posts
11,434
Why did it almost cost your job?

Don't ban him, his signatures are always "entertaining", haha, as well as his nickname, I know it is "Nesagwa", but I still read "Nasegawa".
 

Average Joe

Calmer than you are.
20 Year Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2002
Posts
17,094
So what if you get fired from McDonalds?

Just make the switch to Burger King.

They won't mind hiring someone from the competition.
 

Mushiki

flaming petrosexual,
15 Year Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2003
Posts
11,434
This is the kind of useless violence we don't need...
 

RAINBOW PONY

DASH DARK ANDY K,
20 Year Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2002
Posts
24,310
Average Joe said:
So what if you get fired from McDonalds?

Just make the switch to Burger King.

They won't mind hiring someone from the competition.

come on now, you know mcdonalds doesn't have internet access. don't be mad at me because you work at safeway.
 

Tarma

Old Man
25 Year Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2001
Posts
10,057
I don't really find it offensive, but it's not really appropriate sig material.

Maccy D's don't have net access??!! :eek_2:
 

JHendrix

Jello Pudding Pop, Y'know? Like that whole Bill C
Joined
Jun 27, 2001
Posts
9,436
Ban him? No.

Hopefully get him to change his sig, yes.

I don't want to disable sigs, generally they're funny or useful.
 

Wolferaizer

Gal Ageise's Demon
Joined
Apr 12, 2001
Posts
2,070
Serve you right!
Bludge during work, what a shame! I hope they fired you for real. LOL
 

BlackSpy

Tsrgoihrea,
20 Year Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2002
Posts
2,959
FatGuy said:
There is an option to disable sigs, so I see no reason to open a silly thread like this .

Disabling sigs is not the answer. Just because a few people choose to use their sig selfishly should not mean that people cannot derive the benefit that many sigs give.

What’s needed are clear rules on sigs.
 

NeoDragoN

custom rank,
20 Year Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2001
Posts
7,379
BlackSpy said:
I’ll leave my work to set its internet access policy thanks.

Well if a works policy says no graphic material or sexual content you should know not to browse here anyway.
 

Nash

Fu'un-Ken Master
Joined
Oct 25, 2003
Posts
1,541
BlackSpy said:
Disabling sigs is not the answer. Just because a few people choose to use their sig selfishly should not mean that people cannot derive the benefit that many sigs give.

What’s needed are clear rules on sigs.

he's referring to the fact that you can disable sigs for yourself under your "user CP" options.
 

BlackSpy

Tsrgoihrea,
20 Year Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2002
Posts
2,959
Nash said:
he's referring to the fact that you can disable sigs for yourself under your "user CP" options.

And I was saying that people shouldn't have to deprive themselves of the mostly useful info in sigs because a few people like to use them selfishly.
 

Nesagwa

Beard of Zeus,
20 Year Member
Joined
May 17, 2002
Posts
21,322
answer.jpg
 

SHO

Raiden's Valet
Joined
Nov 20, 2003
Posts
1,122
haha

i dont think he deserve to be ban because of a pic in his sig

the picture is abit gross, but there isnt much wrong with it, just dont look at it or disable the sig in your profile

i love the imatation of dan pic he had in his sig... i burst out laughing the moment i saw it
 
Top